Literature DB >> 15943404

National study of the effect of patient and hospital characteristics on bariatric surgery outcomes.

Alfredo M Carbonell1, Amy E Lincourt, Brent D Matthews, Kent W Kercher, Ronald F Sing, B Todd Heniford.   

Abstract

The influence of patient and hospital demographics on gastric bypass (GB) outcomes is unknown. We analyzed year 2000 data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database for all GB patients. In 2000, 5876 GB were performed in the 137 sample hospitals (M:F, 14%:86%). Length of stay (LOS, days), charges, comorbidities, and morbidity were higher for those aged >60 years compared to < 40 years. LOS, charges, comorbidities, morbidity, and mortality were highest in males. LOS was longest in African Americans compared to Caucasians and Hispanics. Charges and comorbidities were greatest in African Americans and Hispanics compared to Caucasians. Medicare and Medicaid-insured patients have higher LOS, charges, comorbidities, morbidity, and mortality compared to privately insured and self-pay patients. Lower income patients have higher LOS and total charges. Nonteaching hospitals have an increased LOS and charges and treat patients with more comorbidities compared to teaching hospitals. LOS, charges, and morbidity are directly proportional to hospital size. Urban hospitals have lower LOS and higher charges compared to rural hospitals. As hospital GB volume increases, LOS, charges, and morbidity decrease with no mortality effect. After controlling for all other covariates, male gender, increased age, and large hospital size were predictors of increased morbidity. Having had a complication predicted increased mortality, while female gender had a protective effect. Patient income, insurance status, and race did not play a role in morbidity or mortality. Neither academic, teaching status of the hospital or hospital gastric bypass volume influenced patient outcomes. Patient and hospital demographics do affect the outcomes of patients undergoing GB. Increasing age, male gender, and surgery performed in large hospitals are predictors of morbidity. Male gender and postoperative complications predict increased mortality. Neither comorbidities, race, payer, income, hospital academic status, location, nor hospital volume affect the outcome after GB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15943404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  30 in total

1.  Are there gender-specific aspects of sleeve gastrectomy-data analysis from the quality assurance study of surgical treatment of obesity in Germany.

Authors:  Christine Stroh; F Köckerling; R Weiner; Th Horbach; K Ludwig; M Dressler; V Lange; P Loermann; S Wolff; U Schmidt; H Lippert; Th Manger
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  The impact of hospital and surgeon volume on clinical outcome following bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Marta Penna; Alan Karthikesalingam; Majid Hashemi
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  The impact of medicaid status on outcome after gastric bypass.

Authors:  J Wesley Alexander; Hope R Goodman; Lisa R Martin Hawver; Laura James
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 4.  Bariatric surgery: a systematic review of the clinical and economic evidence.

Authors:  Raj Padwal; Scott Klarenbach; Natasha Wiebe; Maureen Hazel; Daniel Birch; Shahzeer Karmali; Arya M Sharma; Braden Manns; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Relative contribution of modifiable versus non-modifiable factors as predictors of racial variance in roux-en-Y gastric bypass weight loss outcomes.

Authors:  K E Limbach; K Ashton; J Merrell; L J Heinberg
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  The effect of hospital teaching status on outcomes in bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Colette S Inaba; Christina Y Koh; Sarath Sujatha-Bhaskar; Yoon Lee; Marija Pejcinovska; Ninh T Nguyen
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.734

7.  Bariatric surgery: low mortality at a high-volume center.

Authors:  Garth H Ballantyne; Scott Belsley; Daniel Stephens; John K Saunders; Amit Trivedi; Douglas R Ewing; Vincent Iannace; Daniel Davis; Rafael F Capella; Annette Wasielewski; S Moran; Hans J Schmidt
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Relationship between surgeon volume and adverse outcomes after RYGB in Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) study.

Authors:  Mark D Smith; Emma Patterson; Abdus S Wahed; Steven H Belle; Marc Bessler; Anita P Courcoulas; David Flum; Valerie Halpin; James E Mitchell; Alfons Pomp; Walter J Pories; Bruce Wolfe
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 4.734

9.  The impact of socioeconomic factors on patient preparation for bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Lisa M Balduf; Geoffrey P Kohn; Joseph A Galanko; Timothy M Farrell
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Are there gender-specific aspects of gastric banding? Data analysis from the quality assurance study of the surgical treatment of obesity in Germany.

Authors:  Christine Stroh; C Groh; R Weiner; K Ludwig; S Wolff; M Kabelitz; T Manger
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.