Literature DB >> 18384500

Housing during early pregnancy affects fertility and behaviour of sows.

C Munsterhjelm1, A Valros, M Heinonen, O Hälli, O A T Peltoniemi.   

Abstract

From 1.1.2013 EU legislation will permit stall-housing of dry sows for only 4 weeks post-service. Stalls are associated with compromised animal welfare, but group housing comes with risks from social confrontations. Studies on housing effects on fertility have produced contradictory results as systems are inconsistently defined. Effects of housing on pregnancy rate 28 days post-service (P28), early disruption of pregnancy (EDP) and behaviour were investigated in 12 replicates of 40 sows. Half of the animals were stalled (treatment S, mean parity 2.4) and half group-housed adjacent on 5.1 m(2) deep litter per sow (treatment G, mean parity 2.3). Pregnancy was detected using real-time ultrasound. An EDP-diagnosis required a drop of salivary progesterone concentration from >15.9 to <15.9 mmol/l in a series of samples taken on days 17, 20, 24 and 27 post-service. Behaviour was scan sampled on day 27 for 120 min with 10-min intervals. Data was analysed using mixed regression models in MLwiN. Treatment S increased the odds for P28 with 2.3 and the pregnancy rate of a treatment group with 0.1 compared with G. G increased the odds for EDP with 4.6. Treatment did not affect total exploratory or total passive behaviour. S sows explored floor and fixtures (not bedding) more and performed more passive sitting than G sows. Social stress may have caused the impaired reproductive performance in G sows. S sows showed behavioural signs of decreased welfare, but no corresponding reproductive effects. An interdisciplinary approach is needed when evaluating the appropriateness of housing systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18384500     DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2007.00956.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Domest Anim        ISSN: 0936-6768            Impact factor:   2.005


  6 in total

1.  Welfare assessment in transgenic pigs expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP).

Authors:  Reinhard C Huber; Liliana Remuge; Ailsa Carlisle; Simon Lillico; Peter Sandøe; Dorte B Sørensen; C Bruce A Whitelaw; I Anna S Olsson
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 2.  Reproduction of group-housed sows.

Authors:  Olli Peltoniemi; Stefan Björkman; Dominiek Maes
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2016-07-01

Review 3.  Coping with large litters: management effects on welfare and nursing capacity of the sow.

Authors:  Olli Peltoniemi; Taehee Han; Jinhyeon Yun
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-31

4.  A systematic review of the impact of housing on sow welfare during post-weaning and early pregnancy periods.

Authors:  Jen-Yun Chou; Thomas D Parsons
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-08-23

Review 5.  Stress and its influence on reproduction in pigs: a review.

Authors:  Stig Einarsson; Ylva Brandt; Nils Lundeheim; Andrzej Madej
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 1.695

Review 6.  A 25 years experience of group-housed sows-reproduction in animal welfare-friendly systems.

Authors:  Stig Einarsson; Ylva Sjunnesson; Fredrik Hultén; Lena Eliasson-Selling; Anne-Marie Dalin; Nils Lundeheim; Ulf Magnusson
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 1.695

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.