Literature DB >> 1838449

A comparison of single-level fusions with and without hardware.

M Lorenz1, M Zindrick, P Schwaegler, L Vrbos, M A Collatz, R Behal, R Cram.   

Abstract

During a 47-month period, 68 patients were studied prospectively to compare single-level lumbar fusion with and without adjunctive pedicular fixation. Fusion indications were disabling back pain for a minimum of 6 months, inability to work, and failed conservative care. Twenty-nine patients fused without hardware and 39 fused with VSP fixation in identical procedures. All patients were evaluated according to fusion success, perceived pain, and return to work. Pseudarthrosis was demonstrated in 58.6% of the noninstrumented group. No pseudarthroses were noted in instrumented patients. Pain improvement in the nonhardware group was 41.4%, and in the hardware group, 76.9%. Return to work was 31% and 72% in each group, respectively. The fusion rate for patients exhibiting single-level disc disease improves with spinal fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1838449     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199108001-00029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  Lumbosacral arthrodesis using pedicular screws and ringed rods.

Authors:  J L Beguiristain; C Villas; R Preite; R Martinez; R H Barrios
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  In vitro testing of a new transpedicular stabilization technique.

Authors:  M Pfeiffer; H Hoffman; V K Goel; J N Weinstein; P Griss
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Pedicle screw fixation in spinal disorders: a European view.

Authors:  N Boos; J K Webb
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparative Analysis of Unilateral versus Bilateral Instrumentation in TLIF for Lumbar Degenerative Disorder: Single Center Large Series.

Authors:  Vigneshwara Badikillaya; Keyur K Akbari; Pramod Sudarshan; Hardik Suthar; Muralidharan Venkatesan; Sajan K Hegde
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09-22

Review 5.  Total disc replacement surgery for symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disease: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Karin D van den Eerenbeemt; Raymond W Ostelo; Barend J van Royen; Wilco C Peul; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Operative Management of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease.

Authors:  Yu Chao Lee; Mario Giuseppe Tedesco Zotti; Orso Lorenzo Osti
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-08-16

7.  Intermittent Hypoxic Therapy Inhibits Allogenic Bone-Graft Resorption by Inhibition of Osteoclastogenesis in a Mouse Model.

Authors:  Natasja Leth Bergholt; Ari Demirel; Michael Pedersen; Ming Ding; Tue Wenzel Kragstrup; Thomas Andersen; Bent Winding Deleuran; Casper Bindzus Foldager
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation versus Unilateral Pedicle and Contralateral Facet Screws for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.

Authors:  Basem I Awad; Daniel Lubelski; John H Shin; Margaret A Carmody; Daniel J Hoh; Thomas E Mroz; Michael P Steinmetz
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2013-07-02

9.  Long-term result of posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine using the Tadpole system.

Authors:  Kriangkrai Wittayapairoj; Zhuo Wang; Toshihiko Sakakibara; Yuichi Kasai
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.