Literature DB >> 9294749

In vitro testing of a new transpedicular stabilization technique.

M Pfeiffer1, H Hoffman, V K Goel, J N Weinstein, P Griss.   

Abstract

The rigidity of a pedicle screw implant is a critical biomechanical variable in lumbar spinal fusions. Sufficient rigidity is required for integration of bone grafts and to promote healing. Osteopenia, stress shielding, and compensatory hypermobility have been described as consequences of excessive rigidity. Little is known about the biomechanical characteristics of "semirigid" compared to "rigid" implants. A new implant, whose rigidity can be varied by selection of different implant components, was tested in vitro under well-defined loading conditions. The three-dimensional load-displacement behavior of all lumbar vertebrae involved in or adjacent to the two-level fusion was evaluated for two fusion modifications: bilateral rigid and bilateral semirigid. Cyclic fatigue loading was subsequently carried out under realistic conditions and motion testing repeated. The rigid device reduced the motion of the L3-4 transfixed segment in the primary movement planes by 87.3% with respect to the intact spine value in flexion/extension (FE), 86.3% in lateral bending (LB), and 76.8% in axial rotation (AR). The semirigid device achieved a reduction in motion of 79.6% (FE), 82.7% (LB), and 51.7% (AR). The semirigid implant was particularly easy to insert, because no bending of rods or plates was necessary. The implants showed no loosening or breakage after the fatigue testing. The results are compared to other available systems and the underlying biomechanics discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9294749      PMCID: PMC3454640          DOI: 10.1007/BF01322447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

1.  Effect of spinal construct stiffness on early fusion mass incorporation. Experimental study.

Authors:  C E Johnston; R B Ashman; A M Baird; R N Allard
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Biomechanics of thoracolumbar spinal fixation. A review.

Authors:  M H Krag
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Biomechanical analysis of transpedicular rod systems. A preliminary report.

Authors:  R M Puno; J E Bechtold; J A Byrd; R B Winter; J W Ogilvie; D S Bradford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  1989 Volvo Award in basic science. Device-related osteoporosis with spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  P C McAfee; I D Farey; C E Sutterlin; K R Gurr; K E Warden; B W Cunningham
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A paradigm of delayed union and nonunion in the lumbosacral joint. A study of motion and bone grafting of the lumbosacral spine in sheep.

Authors:  D A Nagel; P C Kramers; B A Rahn; J Cordey; S M Perren
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Effects of rigidity of an internal fixation device. A comprehensive biomechanical investigation.

Authors:  V K Goel; T H Lim; J Gwon; J Y Chen; J M Winterbottom; J B Park; J N Weinstein; J Y Ahn
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Quantitative histologic study of the influence of spinal instrumentation on lumbar fusions: a canine model.

Authors:  I D Farey; P C McAfee; K R Gurr; M A Randolph
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Experimental evaluation of seven different spinal fracture internal fixation devices using nonfailure stability testing. The load-sharing and unstable-mechanism concepts.

Authors:  R W Gaines; W L Carson; C C Satterlee; G I Groh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The effect of a stiff spinal implant on the bone-mineral content of the lumbar spine in dogs.

Authors:  K R Smith; T R Hunt; M A Asher; H C Anderson; W L Carson; R G Robinson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The effect of spinal implant rigidity on vertebral bone density. A canine model.

Authors:  P C McAfee; I D Farey; C E Sutterlin; K R Gurr; K E Warden; B W Cunningham
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Limitations of current in vitro test protocols for investigation of instrumented adjacent segment biomechanics: critical analysis of the literature.

Authors:  David Volkheimer; Masoud Malakoutian; Thomas R Oxland; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Role of muscle damage on loading at the level adjacent to a lumbar spine fusion: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Masoud Malakoutian; John Street; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Ian Stavness; Marcel Dvorak; Sidney Fels; Thomas Oxland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Evaluation of indication-based use of transpedicular instrumentations with different rigidity for lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective pilot study with 3 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Michael Pfeiffer; Ralph Hildebrand; Michael Grande; Peter Griss
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Biomaterials in Spinal Implants: A Review.

Authors:  Andrew Warburton; Steven J Girdler; Christopher M Mikhail; Amy Ahn; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-11-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.