Literature DB >> 18381943

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms of DNA damage response genes are associated with overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Taro Okazaki1, Li Jiao, Ping Chang, Douglas B Evans, James L Abbruzzese, Donghui Li.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goals of this study were to determine if single-nucleotide polymorphisms in DNA damage repair genes and cell cycle regulating genes affect clinical response to combined gemcitabine radiation therapy and the overall survival (OS) of patients with pancreatic cancer. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We evaluated six single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the ATM, ATM and Rad3-related (ATR), CHEK1, and CHEK2 genes in 119 patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer who were enrolled in clinical trials at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center from February 1999 to January 2006, with follow-up until February 2007. Patients received neoadjuvant concurrent gemcitabine and radiation therapy with or without gemcitabine-cisplatin induction therapy. Genotypes were determined and tested for associations with OS by Kaplan-Meier estimation, the log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis. P values of <or=0.05 were considered significant.
RESULTS: The ATM G60A and CHEK1 G35A genotypes were significant (P<0.05), and the ATR C340T genotype borderline significantly (P=0.079) associated with OS. The hazard ratio of CHEK1 35AA was 2.01 (95% confidence interval, 1.20-3.37; P=0.007) compared with CHEK1 35GG/GA with adjustments for race, sex, diabetes status, CA19-9 level, and success of tumor resection. A significant combined genotype effect was observed between ATM 60GA/GG, ATR 340CT/CC, and CHEK1 35AA with median OS times of 31.0, 16.2, and 10.5 months for patients carrying <or=1, 2, and 3 deleterious alleles, respectively (P=0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest that polymorphic variations of DNA damage response genes affect clinical response to gemcitabine radiation therapy and OS of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18381943      PMCID: PMC2423806          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  28 in total

Review 1.  The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective.

Authors:  B B Zhou; S J Elledge
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-23       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  ATM haplotypes and cellular response to DNA damage: association with breast cancer risk and clinical radiosensitivity.

Authors:  Sandra Angèle; Pascale Romestaing; Norman Moullan; Michèle Vuillaume; Brigitte Chapot; Marlin Friesen; Wim Jongmans; David G Cox; Paola Pisani; Jean-Pierre Gérard; Janet Hall
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: an approach for molecular epidemiology studies.

Authors:  Sholom Wacholder; Stephen Chanock; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Laure El Ghormli; Nathaniel Rothman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Is there an optimal neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer?

Authors:  Richard Kim; Muhammad Wasif Saif
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2007-05-09

5.  Effect of germ-line genetic variation on breast cancer survival in a population-based study.

Authors:  Ellen L Goode; Alison M Dunning; Bettina Kuschel; Catherine S Healey; Nicholas E Day; Bruce A J Ponder; Douglas F Easton; Paul P D Pharoah
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  The ATM-Chk2-Cdc25A checkpoint pathway guards against radioresistant DNA synthesis.

Authors:  J Falck; N Mailand; R G Syljuåsen; J Bartek; J Lukas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-04-12       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Q Liu; S Guntuku; X S Cui; S Matsuoka; D Cortez; K Tamai; G Luo; S Carattini-Rivera; F DeMayo; A Bradley; L A Donehower; S J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 8.  ATM and related protein kinases: safeguarding genome integrity.

Authors:  Yosef Shiloh
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Functional consequences of ATM sequence variants for chromosomal radiosensitivity.

Authors:  Sara Gutiérrez-Enríquez; Marie Fernet; Thilo Dörk; Michael Bremer; Anthony Lauge; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Norman Moullan; Sandra Angèle; Janet Hall
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Activation of mammalian Chk1 during DNA replication arrest: a role for Chk1 in the intra-S phase checkpoint monitoring replication origin firing.

Authors:  C Feijoo; C Hall-Jackson; R Wu; D Jenkins; J Leitch; D M Gilbert; C Smythe
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-09-03       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  23 in total

1.  A replication study and genome-wide scan of single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with pancreatic cancer risk and overall survival.

Authors:  Jason A Willis; Sara H Olson; Irene Orlow; Semanti Mukherjee; Robert R McWilliams; Robert C Kurtz; Robert J Klein
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Association of multi-drug resistance gene polymorphisms with pancreatic cancer outcome.

Authors:  Motofumi Tanaka; Taro Okazaki; Hideo Suzuki; James L Abbruzzese; Donghui Li
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Genetic effects and modifiers of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on survival in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Hongmei Zeng; Herbert Yu; Lingeng Lu; Dhanpat Jain; Mark S Kidd; M Wasif Saif; Stephen J Chanock; Patricia Hartge; Harvey A Risch
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 4.  Is it time to split strategies to treat homologous recombinant deficiency in pancreas cancer?

Authors:  Min Yuen Teo; Eileen M O'Reilly
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-10

5.  The novel ATR inhibitor VE-821 increases sensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells to radiation and chemotherapy.

Authors:  Remko Prevo; Emmanouil Fokas; Philip M Reaper; Peter A Charlton; John R Pollard; W Gillies McKenna; Ruth J Muschel; Thomas B Brunner
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 6.  Systemic therapies for pancreatic cancer--the role of pharmacogenetics.

Authors:  Ross A Soo; Wei-Peng Yong; Federico Innocenti
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.465

7.  miRNA regulation is important for DNA damage repair and recognition in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Fabian Dominik Mairinger; Robert Werner; Elena Flom; Jan Schmeller; Sabrina Borchert; Michael Wessolly; Jeremias Wohlschlaeger; Thomas Hager; Thomas Mairinger; Jens Kollmeier; Daniel Christian Christoph; Kurt Werner Schmid; Robert Fred Henry Walter
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Significant associations of mismatch repair gene polymorphisms with clinical outcome of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoqun Dong; Li Jiao; Yanan Li; Douglas B Evans; Huamin Wang; Kenneth R Hess; James L Abbruzzese; Donghui Li
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Impact of Polymorphic Variations of Gemcitabine Metabolism, DNA Damage Repair, and Drug-Resistance Genes on the Effect of High-Dose Chemotherapy for Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoid Malignancies.

Authors:  Keiji Shinozuka; Hongwei Tang; Roy B Jones; Donghui Li; Yago Nieto
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Synthetic lethal RNAi screening identifies sensitizing targets for gemcitabine therapy in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  David O Azorsa; Irma M Gonzales; Gargi D Basu; Ashish Choudhary; Shilpi Arora; Kristen M Bisanz; Jeffrey A Kiefer; Meredith C Henderson; Jeffrey M Trent; Daniel D Von Hoff; Spyro Mousses
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.