Literature DB >> 12036913

Effect of germ-line genetic variation on breast cancer survival in a population-based study.

Ellen L Goode1, Alison M Dunning, Bettina Kuschel, Catherine S Healey, Nicholas E Day, Bruce A J Ponder, Douglas F Easton, Paul P D Pharoah.   

Abstract

Somatic genetic alterations in tumors are known to correlate with survival, but little is known about the prognostic significance of germ-line variation. We assessed the effect of germ-line variation on survival among women with breast cancer participating in a British population-based study. Up to 2430 cases for whom current vital status data were available were screened for BRCA1/2 mutations and genotyped for polymorphisms in 22 DNA repair, hormone metabolism, carcinogen metabolism, and other genes. The effect of genotype on outcome was assessed by Cox regression analysis. The largest effect was observed for the silent polymorphism D501D (t>c) in LIG4, a gene involved in DNA double-strand break repair. The estimated hazard ratio (HR) in cc homozygotes relative to tt homozygotes was 4.0 (95% confidence interval, 2.1-7.7; P = 0.002), and this effect remained after stratification by stage, grade, and tumor type [HR, 4.2 (1.8-9.4); P = 0.01]. Total length of a CYP19 IVS4 (ttta)(n) repeat was also associated with survival [HR, 0.9 (0.8-1.0); P = 0.01], but this became nonsignificant after stratification by stage, grade, and tumor type. Poorer survival was observed for 10 BRCA1 mutation carriers [HR, 4.1 (1.3-13); P = 0.047]; however, after adjustment for known prognostic factors, the HR estimate decreased to 2.0 and became nonsignificant (P = 0.4). CYP17 (P = 0.05) and TP53 (P = 0.06) polymorphisms showed marginally significant associations in unstratified analyses. No effect on survival was seen for polymorphisms in ATM, BRCA1/2, CHK2, KU70, NBS1, RAD51, RAD52, XRCC3, AR, COMT, NQO1, VDR, ADH3, CYP1A1, GSTP1, TGF-beta, or CDH1. Even if confirmed, the prognostic markers identified in this study are unlikely to replace current markers of prognosis such as estrogen receptor status. However, our results demonstrate the potential of the analysis of germ-line variation to provide insight into the biological determinants of response to treatment and prognosis in breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12036913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  54 in total

1.  Genetic variations in the homologous recombination repair pathway genes modify risk of glioma.

Authors:  Haishi Zhang; Yanhong Liu; Keke Zhou; Chengcheng Zhou; Renke Zhou; Chunxia Cheng; Qingyi Wei; Daru Lu; Liangfu Zhou
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Information recovery in cancer families: value for risk estimations.

Authors:  Hassan Roudgari; Lindsey F Masson; Neva E Haites
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Associations between NBS1 polymorphisms, haplotypes and smoking-related cancers.

Authors:  Sungshim L Park; Delara Bastani; Binh Y Goldstein; Shen-Chih Chang; Wendy Cozen; Lin Cai; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Baoguo Ding; Sander Greenland; Na He; Shehnaz K Hussain; Qingwu Jiang; Yuan-Chin A Lee; Simin Liu; Ming-Lan Lu; Thomas M Mack; Jenny T Mao; Hal Morgenstern; Li-Na Mu; Sam S Oh; Allan Pantuck; Jeanette C Papp; Jianyu Rao; Victor E Reuter; Donald P Tashkin; Hua Wang; Nai-Chieh Y You; Shun-Zhang Yu; Jin-Kou Zhao; Zuo-Feng Zhang
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 4.944

4.  Double-strand breaks repair in lymphoblastoid cell lines from sisters discordant for breast cancer from the New York site of the BCFR.

Authors:  Nicola Machella; Mary Beth Terry; Jennifer Zipprich; Irina Gurvich; Yuyan Liao; Ruby T Senie; David O Kennedy; Regina M Santella
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  Double-strand break damage and associated DNA repair genes predispose smokers to gene methylation.

Authors:  Shuguang Leng; Christine A Stidley; Randy Willink; Amanda Bernauer; Kieu Do; Maria A Picchi; Xin Sheng; Melissa A Frasco; David Van Den Berg; Frank D Gilliland; Christopher Zima; Richard E Crowell; Steven A Belinsky
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  No evidence of familial correlation in breast cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Alice S Whittemore; Beth Stearman; Vickie Venne; Jerry Halpern; Anna Felberg; Valerie McGuire; Mary Daly; Saundra S Buys
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  DNA repair gene polymorphisms and risk of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Donghui Li; Hideo Suzuki; Bingrong Liu; Jeffrey Morris; Jun Liu; Taro Okazaki; Yanan Li; Ping Chang; James L Abbruzzese
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Single-nucleotide polymorphisms of DNA damage response genes are associated with overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Taro Okazaki; Li Jiao; Ping Chang; Douglas B Evans; James L Abbruzzese; Donghui Li
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Ovarian cancer and DNA repair: DNA ligase IV as a potential key.

Authors:  Joana Assis; Deolinda Pereira; Rui Medeiros
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-10

10.  Combined effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms TP53 R72P and MDM2 SNP309, and p53 expression on survival of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Marjanka K Schmidt; Johanna Tommiska; Annegien Broeks; Flora E van Leeuwen; Laura J Van't Veer; Paul D P Pharoah; Douglas F Easton; Mitul Shah; Manjeet Humphreys; Thilo Dörk; Scarlett A Reincke; Rainer Fagerholm; Carl Blomqvist; Heli Nevanlinna
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.