Literature DB >> 26743341

Impact of Polymorphic Variations of Gemcitabine Metabolism, DNA Damage Repair, and Drug-Resistance Genes on the Effect of High-Dose Chemotherapy for Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoid Malignancies.

Keiji Shinozuka1, Hongwei Tang1, Roy B Jones2, Donghui Li1, Yago Nieto3.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes involved in gemcitabine metabolism, DNA damage repair, multidrug resistance, and alkylator detoxification influence the clinical outcome of patients with refractory/relapsed lymphoid malignancies receiving high-dose gemcitabine/busulfan/melphalan (Gem/Bu/Mel) with autologous stem cell support. We evaluated 21 germline SNPs of the gemcitabine metabolism genes CDA, deoxycytidine kinase, and hCNT3; DNA damage repair genes RECQL, X-ray repair complementing 1, RAD54L, ATM, ATR, MLH1, MSH2, MSH3, TREX1, EXO1, and TP73; and multidrug-resistance genes MRP2 and MRP5; as well as glutathione-S-transferase GSTP1 in 153 patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma or myeloma receiving Gem/Bu/Mel. We studied the association of genotypes with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and nonhematological grade 3 or 4 toxicity. CDA C111T and TREX1 Ex14-460C>T genotypes had a significant effect on OS (P = .007 and P = .005, respectively), and CDA C111T, ATR C340T, and EXO1 P757L genotypes were significant predictors for severe toxicity (P = .037, P = .024, and P = .025, respectively) in multivariable models that adjusted for clinical variables. The multi-SNP risk score analysis identified the combined genotypes of TREX1 Ex14-460 TT and hCNT3 Ex5 +25A>G AA as significant predictors for OS and the combination of MRP2 Ex10 + 40GG/GA and MLH1 IVS12-169 TT as significant predictor for PFS. Polymorphic variants of certain genes involved in gemcitabine metabolism and DNA damage repair pathways may be potential biomarkers for clinical outcome in patients with refractory/relapsed lymphoid tumors receiving Gem/Bu/Mel.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage repair; Drug-resistance gene; Gemcitabine metabolism; Glutathione-S-transferases; Single nucleotide polymorphisms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26743341      PMCID: PMC5703203          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  37 in total

1.  Association of multi-drug resistance gene polymorphisms with pancreatic cancer outcome.

Authors:  Motofumi Tanaka; Taro Okazaki; Hideo Suzuki; James L Abbruzzese; Donghui Li
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: an approach for molecular epidemiology studies.

Authors:  Sholom Wacholder; Stephen Chanock; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Laure El Ghormli; Nathaniel Rothman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  High-dose infusional gemcitabine combined with busulfan and melphalan with autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with refractory lymphoid malignancies.

Authors:  Yago Nieto; Peter Thall; Ben Valdez; Borje Andersson; Uday Popat; Paolo Anderlini; Elizabeth J Shpall; Roland Bassett; Amin Alousi; Chitra Hosing; Partow Kebriaei; Muzaffar Qazilbash; Erin Frazier; Alison Gulbis; Christina Chancoco; Qaiser Bashir; Stefan Ciurea; Issa Khouri; Simrit Parmar; Nina Shah; Laura Worth; Gabriela Rondon; Richard Champlin; Roy B Jones
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Interactions of melphalan with glutathione and the role of glutathione S-transferase.

Authors:  S Awasthi; K K Bajpai; J T Piper; S S Singhal; A Ballatore; W E Seifert; Y C Awasthi; G A Ansari
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.922

5.  Busulfan conjugation by glutathione S-transferases alpha, mu, and pi.

Authors:  M Czerwinski; J P Gibbs; J T Slattery
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.922

6.  Correlation of cytidine deaminase polymorphisms and activity with clinical outcome in gemcitabine-/platinum-treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  C Tibaldi; E Giovannetti; M Tiseo; L G Leon; A D'Incecco; N Loosekoot; M Bartolotti; R Honeywell; F Cappuzzo; A Ardizzoni; G J Peters
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  DNA mismatch repair gene polymorphisms affect survival in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoqun Dong; Yanan Li; Kenneth R Hess; James L Abbruzzese; Donghui Li
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-01-06

8.  Polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase Mu 1, glutathione S-transferase theta 1 and glutathione S-transferase Pi 1 genes in Hodgkin's lymphoma susceptibility and progression.

Authors:  Gustavo J Lourenço; Iramaia A Néri; Vitor C S Sforni; Rodolfo Kameo; Irene Lorand-Metze; Carmen S P Lima
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2009-06

9.  Distribution of gemcitabine pathway genotypes in ethnic Asians and their association with outcome in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Ross A Soo; Ling Zhi Wang; Swee Siang Ng; Pei Yi Chong; Wei Peng Yong; Soo Chin Lee; Jian Jun Liu; Tai Bee Choo; Lai San Tham; How Sung Lee; Boon Cher Goh; Richie Soong
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 10.  Pharmacogenomics of gemcitabine: can genetic studies lead to tailor-made therapy?

Authors:  H Ueno; K Kiyosawa; N Kaniwa
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Double epigenetic modulation of high-dose chemotherapy with azacitidine and vorinostat for patients with refractory or poor-risk relapsed lymphoma.

Authors:  Yago Nieto; Benigno C Valdez; Peter F Thall; Roy B Jones; Wei Wei; Alan Myers; Chitra Hosing; Sairah Ahmed; Uday Popat; Elizabeth J Shpall; Muzaffar Qazilbash; Alison Gulbis; Paolo Anderlini; Nina Shah; Qaiser Bashir; Amin Alousi; Yasuhiro Oki; Michelle Fanale; Bouthaina Dabaja; Chelsea Pinnix; Richard Champlin; Borje S Andersson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  A systematic review of inter-individual differences in the DNA repair processes involved in melphalan monoadduct repair in relation to treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Maia van Kan; Kathryn E Burns; Nuala A Helsby
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 3.  DNA Mismatch Repair Gene Variants in Sporadic Solid Cancers.

Authors:  Fabian Caja; Ludmila Vodickova; Jan Kral; Veronika Vymetalkova; Alessio Naccarati; Pavel Vodicka
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.