Literature DB >> 18378233

How good is capsule endoscopy for detection of periampullary lesions? Results of a tertiary-referral center.

John O Clarke1, Samuel A Giday, Priscilla Magno, Eun Ji Shin, Jonathan M Buscaglia, Sanjay B Jagannath, Gerard E Mullin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ampullary adenomas are increasingly being recognized, particularly in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. A capsule endoscopy (CE) is routinely recommended for surveillance of small-intestinal polyposis. Performance characteristics of CE for the detection of periampullary lesions are unclear.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of CE to detect the major duodenal papilla. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: A total of 146 consecutive CE studies were reviewed by 2 CE gastroenterologists at 5 frames per second. Primary outcome was visualization of the major duodenal papilla. Discrepancies were reviewed by 5 CE gastroenterologists.
SETTING: A tertiary-referral center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The ability of CE to detect the duodenal papilla.
RESULTS: Among 146 consecutive CE studies, 21 were excluded: capsule retention (3), patient age <18 years (6), duplicate study (8), and prior surgery disrupting duodenal anatomy (4). Of the remaining 125 studies, indications were the following: obscure GI bleeding (45.6%), iron deficiency anemia (19.2%), abdominal pain (17.6%), diarrhea (10.4%), and Crohn's disease (4.8%). In total, 13 major duodenal papillae were visualized. The median time of detection was 31 seconds after the first duodenal image. This translates to a CE sensitivity of 10.4% for detection of the major papilla. LIMITATION: Papilla position was not verified by an EGD.
CONCLUSIONS: CE has limited sensitivity to visualize the major papilla and lesions in the periampullary small intestine. Nondiagnostic CE studies must not be relied upon as proof that small-bowel lesions do not exist. Consideration should be given for an enteroscopy or side-viewing duodenoscopy in cases where significant clinical concern exists for unrecognized periampullary lesions. The current recommendations about surveillance for small-bowel polyposis should be revised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18378233     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.11.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  14 in total

Review 1.  Capsule endoscopy: The road ahead.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Singeap; Carol Stanciu; Anca Trifan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  New vision in video capsule endoscopy: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Laurel R Fisher; William L Hasler
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Small bowel enteroscopy.

Authors:  Christopher W Teshima; Gary May
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 4.  Small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a ten-point contemporary review.

Authors:  Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Emanuele Rondonotti; Alexandros Karargyris
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Does Back-To-Back Capsule Endoscopy Increase the Diagnostic Yield over a Single Examination in Patients with Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding?

Authors:  Byung-Hoon Min; Dong Kyung Chang; Beom Jin Kim; In Seok Lee; Myung-Gyu Choi
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 4.519

6.  Capsule endoscopy: 10 years on and in the frontline.

Authors:  M E McAlindon; D S Sanders; R Sidhu
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-05-14

7.  Capsule endoscopy in small-bowel surveillance of patients with hereditary polyposis syndromes.

Authors:  Ute Günther; Christian Bojarski; Heinz-Johannes Buhr; Martin Zeitz; Frank Heller
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Capsule endoscopy capture rate: has 4 frames-per-second any impact over 2 frames-per-second?

Authors:  Ignacio Fernandez-Urien; Cristina Carretero; Erika Borobio; Ana Borda; Emilio Estevez; Sara Galter; Begoña Gonzalez-Suarez; Benito Gonzalez; Marisol Lujan; Jose Luis Martinez; Vanessa Martínez; Pedro Menchén; Javier Navajas; Vicente Pons; Cesar Prieto; Julio Valle
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Surveillance of FAP: a prospective blinded comparison of capsule endoscopy and other GI imaging to detect small bowel polyps.

Authors:  Paul Tescher; Finlay A Macrae; Tony Speer; Damien Stella; Robert Gibson; Jason A Tye-Din; Geeta Srivatsa; Ian T Jones; Kaye Marion
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2010-04-04       Impact factor: 2.857

10.  ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Small Bowel Bleeding.

Authors:  Lauren B Gerson; Jeff L Fidler; David R Cave; Jonathan A Leighton
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.