Literature DB >> 18378212

The value of keratometry and central corneal thickness measurements in the clinical diagnosis of Marfan syndrome.

Martin Heur1, Bryan Costin, Sue Crowe, Richard A Grimm, Rocio Moran, Lars G Svensson, Elias I Traboulsi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the utility of keratometry and central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements in diagnosis of Marfan syndrome.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of 211 patients referred for ocular examination to rule out Marfan syndrome.
METHODS: Patients were categorized into Marfan or control groups using current clinical diagnostic criteria. Patients in whom Marfan syndrome could be neither diagnosed nor ruled out were categorized as inconclusive. Those with other connective tissue diseases were excluded from the study. T tests were performed on keratometry and CCT values, and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated.
RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were in the Marfan group and 98 patients were in the control group. Mean age of the Marfan group was 22.3 years vs 19.3 years in the control group (P = .23). Marfan patients had significantly lower keratometry and CCT values than controls (40.8 diopters (D) [Marfan] vs 43.3 D [control], P = 4.0 x 10(-19); and 543.5 microm [Marfan] vs 564.2 microm [control], P = 9.1 x 10(-6)). The maximum OR for keratometry (17.6) was calculated at 42 D. In Marfan syndrome patients without ectopia lentis, these values were 41.5 D (P = .00026 vs control) and 542.0 microm (P = .0011 vs control).
CONCLUSION: There was a highly significant difference in keratometry values between Marfan and control patients, and values less than 42 D could be used as a clinical diagnostic criterion for Marfan syndrome. Significant overlap in CCT values between Marfan and control patients suggests that further investigation is necessary to determine the clinical utility of CCT measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18378212     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.01.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  17 in total

Review 1.  Non-cardiac manifestations of Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Anne H Child
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-11

2.  Corneal Deformation Response and Ocular Geometry: A Noninvasive Diagnostic Strategy in Marfan Syndrome.

Authors:  Lauren C Beene; Elias I Traboulsi; Ibrahim Seven; Matthew R Ford; Abhijit Sinha Roy; Robert S Butler; William J Dupps
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Biometry Characteristics in Adults and Children With Marfan Syndrome: From the Marfan Eye Consortium of Chicago.

Authors:  Michael Kinori; Sarah Wehrli; Iris S Kassem; Nathalie F Azar; Irene H Maumenee; Marilyn B Mets
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Anterior pituitary, sex hormones, and keratoconus: Beyond traditional targets.

Authors:  Dimitrios Karamichos; Paulina Escandon; Brenda Vasini; Sarah E Nicholas; Lyly Van; Deanna H Dang; Rebecca L Cunningham; Kamran M Riaz
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 19.704

Review 5.  The microfibril hypothesis of glaucoma: implications for treatment of elevated intraocular pressure.

Authors:  John Kuchtey; Rachel W Kuchtey
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.671

6.  Candidate gene study to investigate the genetic determinants of normal variation in central corneal thickness.

Authors:  David P Dimasi; Kathryn P Burdon; Alex W Hewitt; Ravi Savarirayan; Paul R Healey; Paul Mitchell; David A Mackey; Jamie E Craig
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.367

Review 7.  Systemic diseases and the cornea.

Authors:  Ruchi Shah; Cynthia Amador; Kati Tormanen; Sean Ghiam; Mehrnoosh Saghizadeh; Vaithi Arumugaswami; Ashok Kumar; Andrei A Kramerov; Alexander V Ljubimov
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.467

8.  Ethnic and mouse strain differences in central corneal thickness and association with pigmentation phenotype.

Authors:  David P Dimasi; Alex W Hewitt; Kenneth Kagame; Sam Ruvama; Ludovica Tindyebwa; Bastien Llamas; Kirsty A Kirk; Paul Mitchell; Kathryn P Burdon; Jamie E Craig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Corneal Curvature, Astigmatism, and Aberrations in Marfan Syndrome with Lens Subluxation: Evaluation by Pentacam HR System.

Authors:  Jiahui Chen; Qinghe Jing; Yating Tang; Dongjin Qian; Yi Lu; Yongxiang Jiang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Elastic microfibril distribution in the cornea: Differences between normal and keratoconic stroma.

Authors:  Tomas L White; Philip N Lewis; Robert D Young; Koji Kitazawa; Tsutomu Inatomi; Shigeru Kinoshita; Keith M Meek
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.467

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.