Michael Kinori1, Sarah Wehrli1, Iris S Kassem2, Nathalie F Azar3, Irene H Maumenee3, Marilyn B Mets4. 1. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 2. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 3. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 4. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: mmets@luriechildrens.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report on the biometric findings of adults and children with Marfan syndrome (MFS) recruited from 2 annual National Marfan Foundation conferences (2012 and 2015). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Subjects diagnosed with MFS by Ghent 2 nosology were included for analysis. Subjects were divided into "adults" (≥16 years of age) and "children" (5-15 years of age). Biometric data included values for refractive error, axial length (AL), corneal curvature, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, and central corneal thickness. RESULTS: Of the 117 subjects evaluated, 74 (35 adults, 32 children, and 7 children <5 years of age) had a definite diagnosis of MFS and were included in the study. The AL was longer (25.25 ± 0.32 mm vs 24.24 ± 0.33 mm, P = .03) and the lens was thicker (3.94 ± 0.09 mm vs 3.62 ± 0.10 mm, P = .03) in adults. Both groups had flat corneas (average keratometry [Kmed] of 41.59 ± 0.35 diopters [D] in adults vs 40.89 ± 0.36 D in children, P = .17). A negative correlation was found between AL and Kmed (-0.33, P < .001). The corneas of patients with MFS with ectopia lentis (EL) were significantly flatter and with higher degree of corneal astigmatism compared to patients without EL (Kmed of 40.68 ± 0.31 D vs 41.75 ± 0.28 D, P < .01 and corneal astigmatism of 1.68 ± 0.16 D vs 1.13 ± 0.14 D, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Children with established MFS have flat corneas at least to the same degree as adults. Corneas of patients with MFS with EL are flatter and have a higher degree of corneal astigmatism. We strongly suggest that corneal parameters should be measured if MFS is suspected, especially in children that may not yet have developed EL.
PURPOSE: To report on the biometric findings of adults and children with Marfan syndrome (MFS) recruited from 2 annual National Marfan Foundation conferences (2012 and 2015). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Subjects diagnosed with MFS by Ghent 2 nosology were included for analysis. Subjects were divided into "adults" (≥16 years of age) and "children" (5-15 years of age). Biometric data included values for refractive error, axial length (AL), corneal curvature, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, and central corneal thickness. RESULTS: Of the 117 subjects evaluated, 74 (35 adults, 32 children, and 7 children <5 years of age) had a definite diagnosis of MFS and were included in the study. The AL was longer (25.25 ± 0.32 mm vs 24.24 ± 0.33 mm, P = .03) and the lens was thicker (3.94 ± 0.09 mm vs 3.62 ± 0.10 mm, P = .03) in adults. Both groups had flat corneas (average keratometry [Kmed] of 41.59 ± 0.35 diopters [D] in adults vs 40.89 ± 0.36 D in children, P = .17). A negative correlation was found between AL and Kmed (-0.33, P < .001). The corneas of patients with MFS with ectopia lentis (EL) were significantly flatter and with higher degree of corneal astigmatism compared to patients without EL (Kmed of 40.68 ± 0.31 D vs 41.75 ± 0.28 D, P < .01 and corneal astigmatism of 1.68 ± 0.16 D vs 1.13 ± 0.14 D, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS:Children with established MFS have flat corneas at least to the same degree as adults. Corneas of patients with MFS with EL are flatter and have a higher degree of corneal astigmatism. We strongly suggest that corneal parameters should be measured if MFS is suspected, especially in children that may not yet have developed EL.
Authors: Bart L Loeys; Harry C Dietz; Alan C Braverman; Bert L Callewaert; Julie De Backer; Richard B Devereux; Yvonne Hilhorst-Hofstee; Guillaume Jondeau; Laurence Faivre; Dianna M Milewicz; Reed E Pyeritz; Paul D Sponseller; Paul Wordsworth; Anne M De Paepe Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Martin Heur; Bryan Costin; Sue Crowe; Richard A Grimm; Rocio Moran; Lars G Svensson; Elias I Traboulsi Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2008-04-18 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Dianna M Milewicz; Alan C Braverman; Julie De Backer; Shaine A Morris; Catherine Boileau; Irene H Maumenee; Guillaume Jondeau; Arturo Evangelista; Reed E Pyeritz Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2021-09-02 Impact factor: 65.038
Authors: Petra Gehle; Barbara Goergen; Daniel Pilger; Peter Ruokonen; Peter N Robinson; Daniel J Salchow Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-09-20 Impact factor: 3.240