Literature DB >> 18377179

Short-term aftereffects of response inhibition: repetition priming or between-trial control adjustments?

Frederick Verbruggen1, Gordon D Logan, Baptist Liefooghe, André Vandierendonck.   

Abstract

Repetition priming and between-trial control adjustments after successful and unsuccessful response inhibition were studied in the stop-signal paradigm. In 5 experiments, the authors demonstrated that response latencies increased after successful inhibition compared with trials that followed no-signal trials. However, this effect was found only when the stimulus (Experiments 1A-4) or stimulus category (Experiment 3) was repeated. Slightly different results were found after trials on which the response inhibition failed. In Experiments 1A, 2, and 4, response latencies increased after unsuccessful inhibition trials compared with after no-inhibition trials, and this happened whether or not the stimulus repeated. Based on these results, we suggest that the aftereffects of successful response inhibition are primarily due to repetition priming, although there was evidence for between-trial control adjustments when inhibition failed. (Copyright) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18377179     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  39 in total

1.  ERP correlates of response inhibition after-effects in the stop signal task.

Authors:  Daniel J Upton; Peter G Enticott; Rodney J Croft; Nicholas R Cooper; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Response inhibition and response monitoring in a saccadic countermanding task in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Katharine N Thakkar; Jeffrey D Schall; Leanne Boucher; Gordon D Logan; Sohee Park
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Impact of orbitofrontal lesions on electrophysiological signals in a stop signal task.

Authors:  Anne-Kristin Solbakk; Ingrid Funderud; Marianne Løvstad; Tor Endestad; Torstein Meling; Magnus Lindgren; Robert T Knight; Ulrike M Krämer
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Neural basis of adaptive response time adjustment during saccade countermanding.

Authors:  Pierre Pouget; Gordon D Logan; Thomas J Palmeri; Leanne Boucher; Martin Paré; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  A habituation account of change detection in same/different judgments.

Authors:  Eddy J Davelaar; Xing Tian; Christoph T Weidemann; David E Huber
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Women are more sensitive than men to prior trial events on the Stop-signal task.

Authors:  Katharine N Thakkar; Eliza Congdon; Russell A Poldrack; Fred W Sabb; Edythe D London; Tyrone D Cannon; Robert M Bilder
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2013-05-15

8.  Perceptual and behavioral adjustments after action inhibition.

Authors:  Wladimir Kirsch; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

9.  Automatic and controlled response inhibition: associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-11

Review 10.  Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.