Literature DB >> 24392904

Impact of orbitofrontal lesions on electrophysiological signals in a stop signal task.

Anne-Kristin Solbakk1, Ingrid Funderud, Marianne Løvstad, Tor Endestad, Torstein Meling, Magnus Lindgren, Robert T Knight, Ulrike M Krämer.   

Abstract

Behavioral inhibition and performance monitoring are critical cognitive functions supported by distributed neural networks including the pFC. We examined neurophysiological correlates of motor response inhibition and action monitoring in patients with focal orbitofrontal (OFC) lesions (n = 12) after resection of a primary intracranial tumor or contusion because of traumatic brain injury. Healthy participants served as controls (n = 14). Participants performed a visual stop signal task. We analyzed behavioral performance as well as event-related brain potentials and oscillations. Inhibition difficulty was adjusted individually to yield an equal amount of successful inhibitions across participants. RTs of patients and controls did not differ significantly in go trials or in failed stop trials, and no differences were observed in estimated stop signal RT. However, electrophysiological response patterns during task performance distinguished the groups. Patients with OFC lesions had enhanced P3 amplitudes to congruent condition go signals and to stop signals. In stop trials, patients had attenuated N2 and error-related negativity, but enhanced error positivity. Patients also showed enhanced and prolonged post-error beta band increases for stop errors. This effect was particularly evident in patients whose lesion extended to the subgenual cingulate cortex. In summary, although response inhibition was not impaired, the diminished stop N2 and ERN support a critical role of the OFC in action monitoring. Moreover, the increased stop P3, error positivity, and post-error beta response indicate that OFC injury affected action outcome evaluation and support the notion that the OFC is relevant for the processing of abstract reinforcers such as performing correctly in the task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24392904      PMCID: PMC4090109          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  87 in total

Review 1.  Adult clinical neuropsychology: lessons from studies of the frontal lobes.

Authors:  Donald T Stuss; Brian Levine
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 2.  Localizing performance of go/no-go tasks to prefrontal cortical subregions.

Authors:  Junichi Chikazoe
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.741

3.  The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?

Authors:  Aneta Dimoska; Stuart J Johnstone; Robert J Barry
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Theta phase resetting and the error-related negativity.

Authors:  Nick Yeung; Rafal Bogacz; Clay B Holroyd; Sander Nieuwenhuis; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Electrophysiological activity underlying inhibitory control processes in normal adults.

Authors:  Mariana Schmajuk; Mario Liotti; Laura Busse; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Attention to affective pictures in closed head injury: event-related brain potentials and cardiac responses.

Authors:  Anne-Kristin Solbakk; Ivar Reinvang; Sven Svebak; Christopher S Nielsen; Kjetil Sundet
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.475

7.  Neurons in anterior cingulate cortex multiplex information about reward and action.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Hayden; Michael L Platt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Inhibitory control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: event-related potentials identify the processing component and timing of an impaired right-frontal response-inhibition mechanism.

Authors:  S R Pliszka; M Liotti; M G Woldorff
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Errors are aversive: defensive motivation and the error-related negativity.

Authors:  Greg Hajcak; Dan Foti
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-02

10.  Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  5 in total

1.  Intact error monitoring in combat Veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  Diane Swick; Nikki Honzel; U Turken
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 2.  The ever-changing OFC landscape: What neural signals in OFC can tell us about inhibitory control.

Authors:  Adam T Brockett; Matthew R Roesch
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Temporal Dynamics of Proactive and Reactive Motor Inhibition.

Authors:  Matthias Liebrand; Inga Pein; Elinor Tzvi; Ulrike M Krämer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Ready for change: Oscillatory mechanisms of proactive motor control.

Authors:  Matthias Liebrand; Jascha Kristek; Elinor Tzvi; Ulrike M Krämer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Differences in Emotional Conflict Processing between High and Low Mindfulness Adolescents: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Xiaomin Chen; Xinmei Deng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.