Literature DB >> 18376403

A metric for odorant comparison.

Rafi Haddad1, Rehan Khan, Yuji K Takahashi, Kensaku Mori, David Harel, Noam Sobel.   

Abstract

In studies of vision and audition, stimuli can be systematically varied by wavelength and frequency, respectively, but there is no equivalent metric for olfaction. Restricted odorant-feature metrics such as number of carbons and functional group do not account for response patterns to odorants varying along other structural dimensions. We generated a multidimensional odor metric, in which each odorant molecule was represented as a vector of 1,664 molecular descriptor values. Revisiting many studies, we found that this metric and a second optimized metric were always better at accounting for neural responses than the specific metric used in each study. These metrics were applicable across studies that differed in the animals studied, the type of olfactory neurons tested, the odorants applied and the recording methods used. We use this new metric to recommend sets of odorants that span the physicochemical space for use in olfaction experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18376403     DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Methods        ISSN: 1548-7091            Impact factor:   28.547


  87 in total

1.  Distributed representation of chemical features and tunotopic organization of glomeruli in the mouse olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Limei Ma; Qiang Qiu; Stephen Gradwohl; Aaron Scott; Elden Q Yu; Richard Alexander; Winfried Wiegraebe; C Ron Yu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Neural activity at the human olfactory epithelium reflects olfactory perception.

Authors:  Hadas Lapid; Sagit Shushan; Anton Plotkin; Hillary Voet; Yehudah Roth; Thomas Hummel; Elad Schneidman; Noam Sobel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Responsiveness of G protein-coupled odorant receptors is partially attributed to the activation mechanism.

Authors:  Yiqun Yu; Claire A de March; Mengjue J Ni; Kaylin A Adipietro; Jérôme Golebiowski; Hiroaki Matsunami; Minghong Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Asymmetries of the human social brain in the visual, auditory and chemical modalities.

Authors:  Alfredo Brancucci; Giuliana Lucci; Andrea Mazzatenta; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  A new challenge-development of test systems for the infochemical effect.

Authors:  Ursula Klaschka
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Sex pheromones and their impact on pest management.

Authors:  Peter Witzgall; Philipp Kirsch; Alan Cork
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Psychometric functions for ternary odor mixtures and their unmixed components.

Authors:  Toshio Miyazawa; Michelle Gallagher; George Preti; Paul M Wise
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Honeybees (Apis mellifera) learn to discriminate the smell of organic compounds from their respective deuterated isotopomers.

Authors:  Wulfila Gronenberg; Ajay Raikhelkar; Eric Abshire; Jennifer Stevens; Eric Epstein; Karin Loyola; Michael Rauscher; Stephen Buchmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The Organization of Projections from Olfactory Glomeruli onto Higher-Order Neurons.

Authors:  James M Jeanne; Mehmet Fişek; Rachel I Wilson
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Odorant reception in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Allison F Carey; Guirong Wang; Chih-Ying Su; Laurence J Zwiebel; John R Carlson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.