Literature DB >> 19189145

A new challenge-development of test systems for the infochemical effect.

Ursula Klaschka1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND, AIM, AND SCOPE: Many-if not all-organisms depend on so-called infochemicals, chemical substances in their surroundings which inform the receivers about their biotic and abiotic environment and which allow them to react adequately to these signals. Anthropogenic substances can interfere with this complex chemical communication system. This finding is called infochemical effect. So far, it is not known to what extent anthropogenic discharges act as infochemicals and influence life and reproduction of organisms in the environment because adequate testing methods to identify chemicals which show the infochemical effect and to quantify their effects have not been developed yet. The purpose of this article is to help and find suitable test designs. MAIN FEATURES: Test systems used in basic research to elucidate the olfactory cascade and the communication of environmental organisms by infochemicals are plentiful. Some of them might be the basis for a quantified ecotoxicological analysis of the infochemical effect. In principle, test systems for the infochemical effect could be developed at each step of the chemosensory signal transduction and processing cascade.
RESULTS: Experimental set-ups were compiled systematically under the aspect whether they might be usable for testing the infochemical effect of single chemicals in standardized quantifying laboratory experiments. For an appropriate ecotoxicological assessment of the infochemical effect, experimental studies of many disciplines, such as molecular biology, neurobiology, physiology, chemical ecology, and population dynamics, should be evaluated in detail before a decision can be made which test system, respectively which test battery, might be suited best. The test systems presented here are based on the knowledge of the genetic sequences for olfactory receptors, binding studies of odorants, signal transmission, and reactions of the receivers on the level of the organisms or the populations. The following basic approaches are conceivable to identify the role of an infochemical: binding studies to the odorant-binding protein or to the odorant receptor binding protein (e.g., by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical studies), measurement of electrical signals of the receptor cells in the tissue (e.g., electroolfactograms, electroantennograms), registration of phenotypic changes (e.g., observation under the microscope), behavioral tests (e.g., in situ online biomonitoring, use of T-shaped olfactometers, tests of avoidance responses), measurement of population changes (e.g., cell density or turbidity measurements), and multispecies tests with observation of community structure and community function. The main focus of this study is on aquatic organisms. DISCUSSION: It is evident that the infochemical effect is a very complex sublethal endpoint, and it needs further studies with standardized quantitative methods to elucidate whether and to what extent the ecosystem is affected. The collection of approaches presented here is far from being complete but should serve as a point of depart for further experimental research.
CONCLUSIONS: This article is the first to compare various approaches for testing the infochemical effect. The development of a suitable test system will not be easy as there are a multitude of relevant chemicals, a multitude of relevant receptors, and a multitude of relevant reactions, and it must be expected that the effective concentrations are very low. The chemical communication is of utmost importance for the ecosystem and justifies great endeavors to find solutions to these technical problems. RECOMMENDATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES: The infochemical effect is a new chapter in ecotoxicology. Will a new endpoint, the so-called infochemical effect, be required in addition to the actual standard test battery of Annex 5 to Commission Directive 92/69/EEC (EC 1992)? Finding the answer to this question is a big challenge that could be met by a comprehensive research project.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19189145     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-008-0093-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  90 in total

1.  Functional identification of a goldfish odorant receptor.

Authors:  D J Speca; D M Lin; P W Sorensen; E Y Isacoff; J Ngai; A H Dittman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Structureminus signOdor Relationships.

Authors:  Karen J. Rossiter
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  1996-12-19       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Combinatorial effects of odorant mixes in olfactory cortex.

Authors:  Zhihua Zou; Linda B Buck
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Identification and expression of odorant-binding proteins of the malaria-carrying mosquitoes Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis.

Authors:  Zheng-Xi Li; John A Pickett; Linda M Field; Jing-Jiang Zhou
Journal:  Arch Insect Biochem Physiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.698

5.  Expanding networks: Signaling components in and a hypothesis for the evolution of metamorphosis.

Authors:  Jason Hodin
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 3.326

6.  Expression of an olfactory receptor in Escherichia coli: purification, reconstitution, and ligand binding.

Authors:  H Kiefer; J Krieger; J D Olszewski; G Von Heijne; G D Prestwich; H Breer
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1996-12-17       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Test of the Binding Threshold Hypothesis for olfactory receptors: explanation of the differential binding of ketones to the mouse and human orthologs of olfactory receptor 912-93.

Authors:  Patrick Hummel; Nagarajan Vaidehi; Wely B Floriano; Spencer E Hall; William A Goddard
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 8.  The chemical defense ecology of marine unicellular plankton: constraints, mechanisms, and impacts.

Authors:  G V Wolfe
Journal:  Biol Bull       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.818

9.  cAMP-independent olfactory transduction of amino acids in Xenopus laevis tadpoles.

Authors:  Ivan Manzini; Detlev Schild
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Epidermal 'alarm substance' cells of fishes maintained by non-alarm functions: possible defence against pathogens, parasites and UVB radiation.

Authors:  Douglas P Chivers; Brian D Wisenden; Carrie J Hindman; Tracy A Michalak; Robin C Kusch; Susan G W Kaminskyj; Kristin L Jack; Maud C O Ferrari; Robyn J Pollock; Colin F Halbgewachs; Michael S Pollock; Shireen Alemadi; Clayton T James; Rachel K Savaloja; Cameron P Goater; Amber Corwin; Reehan S Mirza; Joseph M Kiesecker; Grant E Brown; James C Adrian; Patrick H Krone; Andrew R Blaustein; Alicia Mathis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  3 in total

1.  Chemical communication by infochemicals.

Authors:  Ursula Klaschka
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  No effect of insect repellents on the behaviour of Lymnaea stagnalis at environmentally relevant concentrations.

Authors:  Patrick Fink; Eric von Elert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-24       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Qualitative Risk Analysis for Contents of Dry Toilets Used to Produce Novel Recycling Fertilizers.

Authors:  Ariane Krause; Franziska Häfner; Florian Augustin; Kai M Udert
Journal:  Circ Econ Sustain       Date:  2021-07-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.