Literature DB >> 18376279

Does regular follow-up influence the survival of patients with sarcoma after recurrence? The Miri Shitrit pediatric oncology department experience.

Sergey Postovsky1, Merav Barzilai, Itzhak Meller, Yehuda Kollander, Boris Futerman, Myriam Weyl Ben Arush.   

Abstract

Despite comprehensive management of pediatric sarcomas, only 60% to 70% of children become long-term survivors. This study was undertaken to evaluate whether regular follow-up improves overall survival of children with recurrent sarcomas. The medical charts of 107 children diagnosed with soft tissue and bone sarcomas were reviewed, of whom 29 relapsed. They were divided into 2 groups according to the way of relapse diagnosis: due to complaints/physical examination (14) or on routine imaging studies (15). All were followed by regular physical examination and imaging studies (chest computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and bone scan/positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan with fluorodeoxyglucose) at regular intervals. Analysis of the results showed that (1) regular imaging studies do not facilitate earlier recognition of relapse in children with sarcomas; (2) regular follow-up with imaging studies does not influence overall survival of children with sarcomas; (3) other diagnostic and treatment approaches are needed to improve the survival of children with recurrent sarcomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18376279     DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e31815d88fa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 1077-4114            Impact factor:   1.289


  8 in total

Review 1.  Oncological imaging: tumor surveillance in children.

Authors:  Sue C Kaste
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17

2.  Developing an Evidence-based Followup Schedule for Bone Sarcomas Based on Local Recurrence and Metastatic Progression.

Authors:  Cara Cipriano; Anthony M Griffin; Peter C Ferguson; Jay S Wunder
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  [Postoperative and posttherapeutic changes after primary bone tumors : What's important for radiologists?]

Authors:  T Grieser; I-M Nöbauer-Huhmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  Imaging in childhood cancer: a Society for Pediatric Radiology and Children's Oncology Group Joint Task Force report.

Authors:  Daniel A Weiser; Sue C Kaste; Marilyn J Siegel; Peter C Adamson
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.167

5.  Does intensity of surveillance affect survival after surgery for sarcomas? Results of a randomized noninferiority trial.

Authors:  Ajay Puri; Ashish Gulia; Rohini Hawaldar; Priya Ranganathan; Rajendra A Badwe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Variations of Surveillance Practice for Patients with Bone Sarcoma: A Survey of Australian Sarcoma Clinicians.

Authors:  Jeremy Lewin; Kate Thompson; Susie Bae; Jayesh Desai; Robyn Strong; Denise Caruso; Deborah Howell; Alan Herschtal; Michael Sullivan; Lisa Orme
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2017-02-28

7.  What is the role of routine follow-up for localised limb soft tissue sarcomas? A retrospective analysis of 174 patients.

Authors:  C Rothermundt; J S Whelan; P Dileo; S J Strauss; J Coleman; T W Briggs; S R Haile; B M Seddon
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Is surveillance imaging in pediatric patients treated for localized rhabdomyosarcoma useful? The European experience.

Authors:  Bas Vaarwerk; Coralie Mallebranche; Maria C Affinita; Johanna H van der Lee; Andrea Ferrari; Julia C Chisholm; Anne-Sophie Defachelles; Gian Luca De Salvo; Nadège Corradini; Veronique Minard-Colin; Carlo Morosi; Hervé J Brisse; Kieran McHugh; Gianni Bisogno; Rick R van Rijn; Daniel Orbach; Johannes H M Merks
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 6.860

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.