Literature DB >> 18375279

Influence of knee flexion angle on femoral tunnel characteristics when drilled through the anteromedial portal during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Georges Basdekis1, Claude Abisafi, Pascal Christel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of knee flexion angle for drilling the femoral tunnel during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction via the anteromedial (AM) portal on resulting tunnel orientation and length.
METHODS: In 8 fresh cadaveric knees, the ACL was excised and 2.4-mm guidewires were drilled through the AM bundle footprint using a 5-mm endofemoral aimer via the AM portal. We compared knee flexion angles of 90 degrees , 110 degrees , 130 degrees , and maximum flexion. Anteroposterior-, lateral-, and tunnel-view radiographs were measured to determine tunnel orientation, o'clock position, and direct measurement to determine intra-osseous tunnel length.
RESULTS: With regard to tunnel orientation, each increase in knee flexion angle resulted in significantly more horizontal tunnel both on the anteroposterior view and on the lateral view. While on the tunnel view, the pin became more vertical with knee flexion. At 90 degrees , tunnel length was significantly less (27 +/- 9 mm) than at greater angles, and the guidewires were either resting against the posterior cortex or breaching it.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show the knee flexion angle influences the position of the femoral drilling. It appears in the current study that 110 degrees is optimum, while the 90 degrees pin leads to short tunnel and is so close to the posterior wall there are high risks of posterior wall blow out when drilling the tunnel at its final diameter. Also, 130 degrees of knee flexion is responsible for high tunnel acuity and, finally, maximum flexion being quite variable from one specimen to another cannot be recommended. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Tunnels drilled through the AM portal at 90 degrees are at risk of back wall blow out.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18375279     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  41 in total

1.  Influence of knee flexion and femoral cross-pin insertion angle on posterolateral structures of the knee and lateral fixation lengths during ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Jin Goo Kim; Yong Seuk Lee; Jeong Ku Ha; Sung Soo Jun; Young Jin Chang
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Comparison of femoral graft bending angle and tunnel length between transtibial technique and transportal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Joon Ho Wang; Jae Gyoon Kim; Do Kyung Lee; Hong Chul Lim; Jin Hwan Ahn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Reply to: comments on Alentorn-Geli et al.: anteromedial portal (AMP) versus transtibial (TT) drilling techniques in ACL reconstruction: a blinded cross-sectional study at two- to five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Gonzalo Samitier; Pedro Alvarez; Gilbert Steinbacher; Ramón Cugat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Avoiding tunnel collisions between fibular collateral ligament and ACL posterolateral bundle reconstruction.

Authors:  Lawrence Camarda; Michele D'Arienzo; Giovanni Palermo Patera; Leone Filosto; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Comparative risk of common peroneal nerve injury in far anteromedial portal drilling and transtibial drilling in anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  M Otani; M Nozaki; M Kobayashi; H Goto; K Tawada; Y Waguri-Nagaya; H Okamoto; H Iguchi; N Watanabe; T Otsuka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Comparison of tunnel variability between trans-portal and outside-in techniques in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Jae-Ang Sim; Jong-Min Kim; Sahnghoon Lee; Ji-Yong Bae; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Analysis of the graft bending angle at the femoral tunnel aperture in anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the transtibial and the far anteromedial portal technique.

Authors:  Koji Nishimoto; Ryosuke Kuroda; Kiyonori Mizuno; Yuichi Hoshino; Kouki Nagamune; Seiji Kubo; Masayoshi Yagi; Motoi Yamaguchi; Shinichi Yoshiya; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The effect of intra-operative knee flexion angle on determination of graft location in the anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yuichi Hoshino; Kouki Nagamune; Masayoshi Yagi; Daisuke Araki; Koji Nishimoto; Seiji Kubo; Doita Minoru; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Determinants of Femoral Tunnel Length in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: CT Analysis of the Influence of Tunnel Orientation on the Length.

Authors:  Geethan Iyyampillai; Easwar Thirunellai Raman; David Vaithyalingam Rajan; Ajith Krishnamoorthy; Santhosh Sahanand
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-29

10.  Transparent 3-dimensional CT in evaluation of femoral bone tunnel communication after ACL double-bundle reconstruction: comparison between outside-in and transportal technique.

Authors:  Tomohiro Tomihara; Gen Yoshida; Yo Hara; Masatoshi Taniuchi; Nagakazu Shimada
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.