Literature DB >> 1837308

Audiovisual investigation of the loudness-effort effect for speech and nonspeech events.

L D Rosenblum1, C A Fowler.   

Abstract

There is some evidence that loudness judgments of speech are more closely related to the degree of vocal effort induced in speech production than to the speech signal's surface-acoustic properties such as intensity. Other researchers have claimed that speech loudness can be rationalized simply by considering the acoustic complexity of the signal. Because vocal effort can be specified optically as well as acoustically, a study to test the effort-loudness hypothesis was conducted that used conflicting audiovisual presentations of a speaker that produced consonant-vowel syllables with different efforts. It was predicted that if loudness judgments are constrained by effort perception rather than by simple acoustic parameters, then judgments ought to be affected by visual as well as auditory information. It is shown that loudness judgments are affected significantly by visual information even when subjects are instructed to base their judgments only on what they hear. A similar (though less pronounced) patterning of results is shown for a nonspeech "clapping" event, which attests to the generality of the loudness-effort effect previously thought to be special to speech. Results are discussed in terms of auditory, fuzzy logical, motor, and ecological theories of speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1837308     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.17.4.976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

1.  Audiovisual integration in perception of real words.

Authors:  D J Dekle; C A Fowler; M G Funnell
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-04

2.  Is the auditory sensory memory sensitive to visual information?

Authors:  Julien Besle; Alexandra Fort; Marie-Hélène Giard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual influences on perception of speech and nonspeech vocal-tract events.

Authors:  Lawrence Brancazio; Catherine T Best; Carol A Fowler
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.500

4.  Seeing pitch: visual information for lexical tones of Mandarin-Chinese.

Authors:  Trevor H Chen; Dominic W Massaro
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Toward a Consensus Description of Vocal Effort, Vocal Load, Vocal Loading, and Vocal Fatigue.

Authors:  Eric J Hunter; Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva; Eva van Leer; Miriam van Mersbergen; Chaya Devie Nanjundeswaran; Pasquale Bottalico; Mary J Sandage; Susanna Whitling
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Visual influences on auditory pluck and bow judgments.

Authors:  H M Saldaña; L D Rosenblum
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-09

7.  Hemispheric contributions to the integration of visual and auditory information in speech perception.

Authors:  K Baynes; M G Funnell; C A Fowler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-06

Review 8.  Does Loudness Relate to the Strength of the Sound Produced by the Source or Received by the Ears? A Review of How Focus Affects Loudness.

Authors:  Gauthier Berthomieu; Vincent Koehl; Mathieu Paquier
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-01-28

9.  Spatio-temporal distribution of brain activity associated with audio-visually congruent and incongruent speech and the McGurk Effect.

Authors:  Hillel Pratt; Naomi Bleich; Nomi Mittelman
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.708

10.  Enhancement of loudness discrimination acuity for self-generated sound is independent of musical experience.

Authors:  Nozomi Endo; Takayuki Ito; Katsumi Watanabe; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.