Literature DB >> 18370530

Clinical experience with lamotrigine monotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy: a review of published randomised clinical trials.

E L Mullens1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This paper aimed to provide an overview from published randomised clinical trials of the efficacy and tolerability of lamotrigine monotherapy compared with carbamazepine and phenytoin when initiated in adult patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy.
DESIGN: The review included two double-blind, randomised trials of lamotrigine monotherapy compared with carbamazepine and phenytoin, respectively, and one open randomised trial comparing lamotrigine with carbamazepine. The results of the three trials were pooled for comparison of tolerability.
SETTING: Multicentre in Europe. PATIENTS: Adult patients (>12 years of age) with newly diagnosed partial seizures (with or without secondary generalisation) and primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures (n = 443 patients on lamotrigine, n = 246 on carbamazepine, n = 95 on phenytoin).
RESULTS: Comparable efficacy was demonstrated between lamotrigine and both carbamazepine or phenytoin. The time to withdrawal survival analysis supported a significant difference in favour of lamotrigine [hazard ratio 1.57 (95% CI 1.07 to 2.31)] in the double-blind trial. Overall, twice the proportion of patients withdrew from carbamazepine or phenytoin because of adverse events (19.1 and 18.9%, respectively) compared with lamotrigine (9.5%). Lamotrigine was particularly well tolerated with regard to adverse effects affecting the central nervous system. Rash was the most common adverse event necessitating discontinuation of each drug, the rates being very similar across treatment groups (6.1% on lamotrigine, 8.9% on carbamazepine, 5.3% on phenytoin). The rate of rash resulting in withdrawal of lamotrigine was clearly related to the dose escalation employed in the different trials during the first month of therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Lamotrigine is an effective monotherapy treatment for adult patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy, and is better tolerated than either carbamazepine or phenytoin monotherapy. The incidence of rash requiring withdrawal of lamotrigine is related to dose escalation (2.2% of patients withdrawing when the recommended escalation was followed).

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 18370530     DOI: 10.2165/00044011-199816020-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  14 in total

1.  Lamotrigine versus placebo in the prophylaxis of migraine with and without aura.

Authors:  T J Steiner; L J Findley; A W Yuen
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.292

2.  A randomised open multicentre comparative trial of lamotrigine and carbamazepine as monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent epilepsy.

Authors:  M Reunanen; M Dam; A W Yuen
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.045

3.  Interaction of the antiepileptic drug lamotrigine with recombinant rat brain type IIA Na+ channels and with native Na+ channels in rat hippocampal neurones.

Authors:  X Xie; B Lancaster; T Peakman; J Garthwaite
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.657

4.  Serum anticonvulsant concentrations and the risk of drug induced skin eruptions.

Authors:  D Chadwick; M D Shaw; P Foy; M D Rawlins; D M Turnbull
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Long-term safety and efficacy of lamotrigine (Lamictal) in paediatric patients with epilepsy.

Authors:  F M Besag; O Dulac; J Alving; E L Mullens
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.184

6.  Lamotrigine for generalized seizures associated with the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Lamictal Lennox-Gastaut Study Group.

Authors:  J Motte; E Trevathan; J F Arvidsson; M N Barrera; E L Mullens; P Manasco
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-12-18       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Lamotrigine substitution study: evidence for synergism with sodium valproate? 105 Study Group.

Authors:  M J Brodie; A W Yuen
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.045

8.  Double-blind comparison of lamotrigine and carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy. UK Lamotrigine/Carbamazepine Monotherapy Trial Group.

Authors:  M J Brodie; A Richens; A W Yuen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-02-25       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Comparison of carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and primidone in partial and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures.

Authors:  R H Mattson; J A Cramer; J F Collins; D B Smith; A V Delgado-Escueta; T R Browne; P D Williamson; D M Treiman; J O McNamara; C B McCutchen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-07-18       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A comparison of valproate with carbamazepine for the treatment of complex partial seizures and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures in adults. The Department of Veterans Affairs Epilepsy Cooperative Study No. 264 Group.

Authors:  R H Mattson; J A Cramer; J F Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-09-10       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of Age-Related Factors on the Pharmacokinetics of Lamotrigine and Potential Implications for Maintenance Dose Optimisation in Future Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Sven C van Dijkman; Nico C B de Jager; Willem M Rauwé; Meindert Danhof; Oscar Della Pasqua
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Treatment of typical absence seizures and related epileptic syndromes.

Authors:  C P Panayiotopoulos
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.022

3.  Population pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine in Chinese children with epilepsy.

Authors:  Da-ke He; Li Wang; Jiong Qin; Shen Zhang; Wei Lu; Ling Li; Jian-ming Zhang; Wei-qun Bao; Xiao-qing Song; Hai-tao Liu
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 6.150

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.