Literature DB >> 7710545

Double-blind comparison of lamotrigine and carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy. UK Lamotrigine/Carbamazepine Monotherapy Trial Group.

M J Brodie1, A Richens, A W Yuen.   

Abstract

Lamotrigine has been licensed widely as adjunctive therapy for partial and secondary generalised seizures. Use of the drug as monotherapy was investigated in a double-blind, randomised, parallel-group comparison with carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy. After 4 weeks of planned, fixed dose escalation, doses were adjusted according to efficacy, adverse events, and plasma concentrations. 151 of 260 patients (131 lamotrigine, 129 carbamazepine) in eight UK centres completed the 48-week trial. No differences in efficacy between the drugs were found for partial seizures with or without secondary generalisation or for primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures. The proportion of patients maintained seizure-free during the last 24 weeks of treatment was almost the same in both groups (39% lamotrigine, 38% carbamazepine). More patients with primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures (47% both groups) than those presenting with a focal onset (35%, 37%) were fully controlled. Overall, fewer patients on lamotrigine than on carbamazepine withdrew because of adverse events (15 vs 27%). The commonest side-effect leading to withdrawal with either drug was rash (9%, 13%). Sleepiness was less common in lamotrigine than in carbamazepine recipients (12 vs 22%, p < 0.05). More lamotrigine than carbamazepine recipients (65 vs 51%, p = 0.018) completed the study (hazard ratio 1.57 [95% CI 1.07-2.31]). Lamotrigine and carbamazepine showed similar efficacy against partial onset seizures and primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures in newly diagnosed epilepsy. Lamotrigine, however, was better tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7710545     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90581-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  90 in total

1.  Validation of a population pharmacokinetic model for adjunctive lamotrigine therapy in children.

Authors:  C Chen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Place of polytherapy in the early treatment of epilepsy.

Authors:  Charles L P Deckers
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 3.  New antiepileptic drugs: comparative studies of efficacy and cognition.

Authors:  Steven L Weinstein; Joan Conry
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 4.  New antiepileptic drugs.

Authors:  C W Bazil
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.081

5.  Pros and cons for the development of new antiepileptic drugs.

Authors:  Meir Bialer; Matthew C Walker; Josemir W Sander
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.749

6.  The cost effectiveness of two new antiepileptic therapies in the absence of direct comparative data: a first approximation.

Authors:  Ben A van Hout; Dennis D Gagnon; Pauline McNulty; Anthony O'Hagan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Complex Partial Seizures in Adults.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Primary Generalized Epilepsies.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 9.  New drugs for the treatment of epilepsy: a practical approach.

Authors:  S Beyenburg; J Bauer; M Reuber
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  The Art of Managing Conversions between Antiepileptic Drugs: Maximizing Patient Tolerability and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Erik K St Louis
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2010-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.