Literature DB >> 18369636

The role of lymphadenectomy in high risk prostate cancer.

Fiona C Burkhard1, Urs E Studer.   

Abstract

Historically, patients with high risk prostate cancer were considered poor candidates for radical prostatectomy (RP) due to the likelihood of positive pelvic lymph nodes and decreased long term survival. Although there is still no consensus on the optimal therapy for this group of patients, there is increasing evidence that surgery could play a role. Cancer specific survival (CSS) rates after RP for locally advanced disease at 10 year follow up range from 29 to 72%, depending on tumor differentiation. The role of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in prostate cancer remains a controversial topic. Nonetheless, in conjunction with RRP extended PLND (ePLND) should be performed as extended lymph node dissection in lieu of standard PLND may increase staging accuracy, influence decision making with respect to adjuvant therapy and possibly impact outcome. High risk patients with organ confined prostate cancer and low volume (micro)metastatic disease may be the ones to profit most from this approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18369636     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-008-0251-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  37 in total

1.  Disease progression and survival of patients with positive lymph nodes after radical prostatectomy. Is there a chance of cure?

Authors:  Pia Bader; Fiona C Burkhard; Regula Markwalder; Urs E Studer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Update: NCCN prostate cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Peter Scardino
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update.

Authors:  Ian Thompson; James Brantley Thrasher; Gunnar Aus; Arthur L Burnett; Edith D Canby-Hagino; Michael S Cookson; Anthony V D'Amico; Roger R Dmochowski; David T Eton; Jeffrey D Forman; S Larry Goldenberg; Javier Hernandez; Celestia S Higano; Stephen R Kraus; Judd W Moul; Catherine M Tangen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Biochemical outcome following external beam radiation therapy with or without androgen suppression therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; D Schultz; M Loffredo; R Dugal; M Hurwitz; I Kaplan; C J Beard; A A Renshaw; P W Kantoff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-09-13       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Radioisotope guided pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer.

Authors:  F Wawroschek; H Vogt; D Weckermann; T Wagner; M Hamm; R Harzmann
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: comparison of the extended and modified techniques.

Authors:  N N Stone; R G Stock; P Unger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Prostate-specific antigen velocity risk count assessment: a new concept for detection of life-threatening prostate cancer during window of curability.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter; Anna Kettermann; Luigi Ferrucci; Patricia Landis; E Jeffrey Metter
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  The extent of lymphadenectomy for pTXNO prostate cancer does not affect prostate cancer outcome in the prostate specific antigen era.

Authors:  David S DiMarco; Horst Zincke; Thomas J Sebo; Jeffrey Slezak; Erik J Bergstralh; Michael L Blute
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  The association between total and positive lymph node counts, and disease progression in clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy A Masterson; Fernando J Bianco; Andrew J Vickers; Christopher J DiBlasio; Paul A Fearn; Farhang Rabbani; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Extended experience with radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T3 prostate cancer: outcome and contemporary morbidity.

Authors:  S E Lerner; M L Blute; H Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  13 in total

1.  Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging.

Authors:  Seung Hwan Lee; Kyung Kgi Park; Kyung Hwa Choi; Beom Jin Lim; Joo Hee Kim; Seung Wook Lee; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Is extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer the only recommended option? A systematic over-view of the literature.

Authors:  Thomas Rees; Nicholas Raison; Mohammed Iqbal Sheikh; Zahra Jaffry; Sanjeev Madaan; Ben Challacombe; Kamran Ahmed; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-12

Review 3.  Lymphotropic nanoparticle-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer: value and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  Ansje S Fortuin; Robert Jan Smeenk; Hanneke J M Meijer; Alfred J Witjes; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  [Value of lymphadenectomy for limited nodal recurrence of prostate cancer after local therapy with curative intent].

Authors:  I Wolff; M-O Grimm; M Wirth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Functional imaging for prostate cancer: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Carina Mari Aparici; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.446

6.  Survival in prostate cancer patients > or = 70 years after radical prostatectomy and comparison to younger patients.

Authors:  Jesco Pfitzenmaier; Sascha Pahernik; Stephan Buse; Axel Haferkamp; Nenad Djakovic; Markus Hohenfellner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Considering the role of radical prostatectomy in 21st century prostate cancer care.

Authors:  Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 8.  Molecular and functional imaging for detection of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ansje Fortuin; Maarten de Rooij; Patrik Zamecnik; Uwe Haberkorn; Jelle Barentsz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Phase II trial of short-term neoadjuvant docetaxel and complete androgen blockade in high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  B Mellado; A Font; A Alcaraz; L A Aparicio; F J G Veiga; J Areal; E Gallardo; N Hannaoui; J R M Lorenzo; A Sousa; P L Fernandez; P Gascon
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  External Validation of the Briganti Nomogram to Predict Lymph Node Invasion in Prostate Cancer-Setting a New Threshold Value.

Authors:  Bartosz Małkiewicz; Kuba Ptaszkowski; Klaudia Knecht; Adam Gurwin; Karol Wilk; Paweł Kiełb; Krzysztof Dudek; Romuald Zdrojowy
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.