Literature DB >> 18368024

Newborn blood spot screening in four countries: stakeholder involvement.

Beth K Potter1, Denise Avard, Brenda J Wilson.   

Abstract

While newborn blood spot screening has historically been viewed as a public health success, the potential harms and benefits are more finely balanced for new conditions being considered for program expansion. We highlight complex issues that must be addressed in policy decisions, which in turn requires a consideration of many stakeholder perspectives. Using national policy documents from the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia, and Canada, we describe the participation of stakeholder organizations in the newborn screening policy process, how such organizations have incorporated stakeholder views into their own policy writing, and their recommendations for inclusiveness. Stakeholder participation in newborn screening decision-making is widely acknowledged as important, and many methods have been endorsed - consultation as well as direct or indirect input into policy development. Differences across organizations and jurisdictions raise questions about the most effective approaches for facilitating inclusiveness, suggesting a need for formal evaluative research.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18368024     DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jphp.3200161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Policy        ISSN: 0197-5897            Impact factor:   2.222


  8 in total

Review 1.  Population genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: founder mutations to genomes.

Authors:  William D Foulkes; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Clare Turnbull
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Ethical, legal, and social issues in health technology assessment for prenatal/preconceptional and newborn screening: a workshop report.

Authors:  B K Potter; D Avard; V Entwistle; C Kennedy; P Chakraborty; M McGuire; B J Wilson
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 3.  International differences in the evaluation of conditions for newborn bloodspot screening: a review of scientific literature and policy documents.

Authors:  Marleen E Jansen; Selina C Metternick-Jones; Karla J Lister
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 4.  A systematic review of the views of healthcare professionals on the scope of preimplantation genetic testing.

Authors:  Maria Siermann; Zoë Claesen; Laurent Pasquier; Taneli Raivio; Olga Tšuiko; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Pascal Borry
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-01-14

5.  Newborn screening for pompe disease? a qualitative study exploring professional views.

Authors:  Carla G van El; Tessel Rigter; Arnold J J Reuser; Ans T van der Ploeg; Stephanie S Weinreich; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 6.  Policy Making in Newborn Screening Needs a Structured and Transparent Approach.

Authors:  Marleen E Jansen; Karla J Lister; Henk J van Kranen; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-03-21

7.  Newborn screening for haemophilia: The views of families and adults living with haemophilia in the UK.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman; Rachel Hale; Philip J Young
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.287

8.  Simple Test, Complex System: Multifaceted Views of Newborn Screening Science, Technology, and Policy.

Authors:  Kee Chan; Michael Petros
Journal:  Glob Pediatr Health       Date:  2019-12-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.