Literature DB >> 11029679

Continuous quality improvement for patients with back pain.

R A Deyo1, M Schall, D M Berwick, T Nolan, P Carver.   

Abstract

Recent evidence has changed traditional approaches to low back pain, suggesting minimal bed rest, highly selective imaging, and early return to normal activities. However, there are wide geographical variations in care, and substantial gaps between practice and evidence. This project sought to merge scientific evidence about back pain and knowledge about behavior change to help organizations improve care for back pain. Participating insurance plans, HMOs, and group practices focused on problems they themselves identified. The year-long program included quarterly meetings, coaching for rapid cycles of change, a menu of potential interventions, and recommendations for monitoring outcomes. Participants interacted through meetings, e-mail, and conference calls. Of the 22 participating organizations, 6 (27%) made major progress. Typical changes were reduced imaging, bed rest, and work loss, and increased patient education and satisfaction. Specific examples were a 30% decrease in plain x-rays, a 100% increase in use of patient education materials, and an 81% drop in prescribed bed rest. Despite the complexity of care for back pain, rapid improvements appear feasible. Several organizations had major improvements, and most experienced at least modest improvements. Key elements of successful programs included focus on a small number of clinical goals, frequent measurement of outcomes among small samples of patients, vigilance in maintaining gains; involvement of office staffs as well as physicians, and changes in standard protocols for imaging, physical therapy, and referral.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11029679      PMCID: PMC1495586          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.90717.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  31 in total

1.  Clinical trial of intensive muscle training for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  C Manniche; G Hesselsøe; L Bentzen; I Christensen; E Lundberg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988 Dec 24-31       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  1987 Volvo award in clinical sciences. A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain.

Authors:  G Waddell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Early diagnostic evaluation of low back pain.

Authors:  R A Deyo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care.

Authors:  D M Berwick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-01-05       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Low back pain: the controversy of radiologic evaluation.

Authors:  J A Gehweiler; R H Daffner
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Optimum radiographic examination for consideration of compensation awards: II. Cervical and lumbar spines.

Authors:  R L Eisenberg; M W Hedgcock; E A Williams; B J Lyden; J R Akin; G A Gooding; C O Ovenfors
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs: an adequate lumbar spine examination.

Authors:  J G Scavone; R F Latshaw; W A Weidner
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  The oblique view: an unnecessary component of the initial adult lumbar spine examination.

Authors:  J T Rhea; S A DeLuca; H J Llewellyn; R J Boyd
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Single, well centered lateral view of lumbosacral spine: is coned view necessary?

Authors:  R L Eisenberg; J R Akin; M W Hedgcock
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  A study of computer-assisted tomography. I. The incidence of positive CAT scans in an asymptomatic group of patients.

Authors:  S W Wiesel; N Tsourmas; H L Feffer; C M Citrin; N Patronas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  6 in total

1.  Two kinds of knowledge to achieve better care.

Authors:  L A Headrick
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Supportive Care in Older Adults with Cancer: Across the Continuum.

Authors:  Thuy Koll; Mackenzi Pergolotti; Holly M Holmes; Huibrie C Pieters; G J van Londen; Zachary A Marcum; Amy R MacKenzie; Christopher B Steer
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Interventions for improving the appropriate use of imaging in people with musculoskeletal conditions.

Authors:  Simon D French; Sally Green; Rachelle Buchbinder; Hayley Barnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

4.  Back pain outcomes in primary care following a practice improvement intervention:- a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Alan C Breen; Eloise Carr; Jennifer E Langworthy; Clive Osmond; Louise Worswick
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Testing the effectiveness of an innovative information package on practitioner reported behaviour and beliefs: the UK Chiropractors, Osteopaths and Musculoskeletal Physiotherapists Low back pain ManagemENT (COMPLeMENT) trial [ISRCTN77245761].

Authors:  David W Evans; Nadine E Foster; Martin Underwood; Steven Vogel; Alan C Breen; Tamar Pincus
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Can feedback approaches reduce unwarranted clinical variation? A systematic rapid evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Reema Harrison; Reece Amr Hinchcliff; Elizabeth Manias; Steven Mears; David Heslop; Victoria Walton; Ru Kwedza
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.