Literature DB >> 18358566

Evidence-based perspectives on pay for performance and quality of patient care and outcomes in emergency medicine.

Seth W Glickman1, Kevin A Schulman, Eric D Peterson, Michael B Hocker, Charles B Cairns.   

Abstract

Pay for performance is gaining momentum as a means to improve the quality of clinical care. Recently, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has expanded pay for performance initiatives to incorporate 9 emergency care metrics, including indicators for cardiac, pneumonia, and stroke care. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) have published methodology for the selection and creation of performance measures for quantifying the quality of cardiovascular care. The purpose of this study is to grade each of the 9 Physician Quality Reporting Initiative emergency medicine process measures according to the ACC/AHA criteria related to clinical evidence (yes, no, indeterminate). Five of the 9 recently selected metrics in emergency medicine do not appear to meet all of the ACC/AHA criteria for measurement selection. Several of the metrics, including aspirin for acute myocardial infarction (mean hospital adherence 94.7%; SD 6.7%) and pulse oximetry for community-acquired pneumonia (mean 99.4%; SD 2.0%), already have high levels of performance nationally, which raises uncertainty about the overall cost-effectiveness of quality improvement interventions for these measures. Formal methodology needs to be established for future selection of performance measures for quality improvement programs in emergency care. These performance measures should focus on unique aspects of emergency and acute care, including recognition and treatment of time-sensitive life-threatening conditions, assessment of patients with undifferentiated signs and symptoms, and care of all-inclusive geographically based patient populations. In key emergency therapeutic areas, the evidence linking treatment and improved patient outcomes will require additional study before inclusion in pay for performance programs. New research initiatives are needed to assess the effect of timely administration of emergency department interventions on patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18358566     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  6 in total

1.  Using data envelopment analysis for assessing the performance of pediatric emergency department physicians.

Authors:  Javier Fiallos; Jonathan Patrick; Wojtek Michalowski; Ken Farion
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2015-10-05

2.  Interdisciplinary strategies for arrhythmia program development: measuring quality, performance, and outcomes.

Authors:  N A Mark Estes; Munther Homoud; Jonathan Weinstock; Caroline Foote; Ania Garlitski; Mark Link; Afshin Ehsan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Fee-for-service payment - an evil practice that must be stamped out?

Authors:  Naoki Ikegami
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-02-06

4.  Pay-for-Performance Initiatives: Modest Benefits for Improving Healthcare Quality.

Authors:  Amit Sura; Nirav R Shah
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2010-03

5.  Evaluating emergency physicians: data envelopment analysis approach.

Authors:  Javier Fiallos; Ken Farion; Wojtek Michalowski; Jonathan Patrick
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

6.  What Can Emergency Medicine Learn From Kinetics: Introducing an Alternative Evaluation and a Universal Criterion Standard for Emergency Department Performance.

Authors:  Chih-Long Pan; Chin-Fu Chang; Chun-Wen Chiu; Chih-Hsien Chi; Zhong Tian; Jyh-Horng Wen; Jet-Chau Wen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.