Literature DB >> 25674568

Fee-for-service payment - an evil practice that must be stamped out?

Naoki Ikegami1.   

Abstract

Co-opting physicians to regulate Fee-for-Service (FFS) payment is more feasible and simpler to administer than capitation, Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) and pay-for-performance. The key lies in designing and revising the fee schedule, which not only defines and sets the fee for each item, but also the conditions of billing. Adherence to these regulations must be strictly audited in order to control volume and costs, and to assure quality. The fee schedule requires periodic revisions on an item-by-item basis in order to maintain balance among the providers, to list new drugs, devices and equipment, and to reflect the lower market prices of existing ones. Implementing the fee schedule will facilitate the control of balance billing and extra billing, and the introduction of more sophisticated methods of payment in the future.

Keywords:  Fee-for-Service (FFS); Professional ethics; Regulations

Year:  2015        PMID: 25674568      PMCID: PMC4322626          DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag        ISSN: 2322-5939


  7 in total

1.  Paying for hospital care: the experience with implementing activity-based funding in five European countries.

Authors:  Jacqueline O'Reilly; Reinhard Busse; Unto Häkkinen; Zeynep Or; Andrew Street; Miriam Wiley
Journal:  Health Econ Policy Law       Date:  2012-01

2.  Commercial pressures on professionalism in american medical care: from Medicare to the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Theodore R Marmor; Robert W Gordon
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  What passes and fails as health policy and management.

Authors:  David Chinitz; Victor G Rodwin
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.265

Review 4.  Capitation, salary, fee-for-service and mixed systems of payment: effects on the behaviour of primary care physicians.

Authors:  T Gosden; F Forland; I S Kristiansen; M Sutton; B Leese; A Giuffrida; M Sergison; L Pedersen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

Review 5.  Evidence-based perspectives on pay for performance and quality of patient care and outcomes in emergency medicine.

Authors:  Seth W Glickman; Kevin A Schulman; Eric D Peterson; Michael B Hocker; Charles B Cairns
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  An examination of pay-for-performance in general practice in Australia.

Authors:  Jessica Greene
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-01-27       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Games policy makers and providers play: introducing case-mix-based payment to hospital chronic care units in Japan.

Authors:  Naoki Ikegami
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.265

  7 in total
  13 in total

1.  Healthcare Reimbursement and Quality Improvement: Integration Using the Electronic Medical Record Comment on "Fee-for-Service Payment--an Evil Practice That Must Be Stamped Out?".

Authors:  John R Britton
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-05-08

2.  In Defense of Regulated Fee-for-Service Payment: A Response to Recent Commentaries.

Authors:  Naoki Ikegami
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-07-14

3.  Two Wrongs Do Not Make a Right: Flaws in Alternatives to Fee-for-Service Payment Plans Do Not Mean Fee-for-Service Is a Good Solution to Rising Prices Comment on "Fee-for-Service Payment - An Evil Practice That Must Be Stamped Out?".

Authors:  Ross Koppel
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-05-11

4.  Economic factors in the future delivery of spinal healthcare.

Authors:  Vincent J Rossi; Junyoung Ahn; Daniel D Bohl; Ehsan Tabaraee; Kern Singh
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-06-18

5.  Achieving Universal Health Coverage by Focusing on Primary Care in Japan: Lessons for Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Naoki Ikegami
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2016-02-25

6.  Low Socioeconomic Status Is Associated With Increased Complication Rates: Are Risk Adjustment Models Necessary in Cervical Spine Surgery?

Authors:  Alexander M Lieber; Anthony J Boniello; Yehuda E Kerbel; Philip Petrucelli; Venkat Kavuri; Andre Jakoi; Amrit S Khalsa
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-09-12

Review 7.  Supporting strategic health purchasing: a case study of annual health budgets from general tax revenue and social health insurance in Abia state, Nigeria.

Authors:  Chinyere Mbachu; Chinyere Okeke; Chinonso Obayi; Agnes Gatome-Munyua; Nkechi Olalere; Ikechi Ogbonna; Benjamin Uzochukwu; Obinna Onwujekwe
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2021-12-20

8.  Bad to All? A Novel Way to Analyze the Effects of Fee-for-Service on Multiple Grades Hospitals Operation Outcomes.

Authors:  Yiting Wang; Wenhui Hou; Xiaokang Wang; Hongyu Zhang; Jianqiang Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  An exploration of barriers and enablers to the conduct and application of research among complementary and alternative medicine stakeholders in Australia and New Zealand: A qualitative descriptive study.

Authors:  Yasamin Veziari; Saravana Kumar; Matthew J Leach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of provider incentives on dental X-raying in NHS Scotland: what happens if patients switch providers?

Authors:  Olivier Kalmus; Martin Chalkley; Stefan Listl
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.