Literature DB >> 18357442

Coordination and control of bimanual prehension: effects of perturbing object location.

Andrea H Mason1.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the coordination of the two effectors when one or both targets were displaced in a bimanual prehension task. Sixteen right-handed volunteers were asked to reach 20 cm to grasp and lift two cubic objects with the right and left hands. Upon initiation of the reach: (1) both objects could remain at the initial position (NN); (2) the right object could be displaced toward the subject (NJ); (3) the left object could be displaced (JN); or (4) both objects could be displaced (JJ). Generally, the results indicated that the hand moving to the perturbed object was reorganized to reach the target efficiently, but hovered to somewhat couple object lift for the two hands. In contrast, adjustments were seen in the velocity profiles of the hand moving to the non-perturbed target, including a premature deceleration phase and corrective movements to reach the target location. Together, these results indicate that when the perturbation of one object occurs during the performance of a bimanual prehension task, visual information is used to independently update the control process for the limb moving to the perturbed object. Additionally, interference causes the limb moving to the non-perturbed target to be inappropriately adjusted in response to the perturbation. Our results also indicated that perceptual and motor factors such as time allotted for the use of feedback and the direction of movement may play a role in the independence/dependence relationship between the hands during bimanual tasks. Furthermore, subjects' expectations about the performance and goal of the task could have a further influence on the level of interference seen during bimanual movements. Finally, despite interference effects which caused multiple accelerations and decelerations, the hand moving to the non-perturbed target still achieved the target location in the same movement time as during control conditions. This final result indicates the efficiency with which subjects can reorganize both limbs in the face of altered task requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18357442     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1351-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  25 in total

1.  Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions.

Authors:  J Diedrichsen; E Hazeltine; S Kennerley; R B Ivry
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

2.  Does the type of prehension influence the kinematics of reaching?

Authors:  U Castiello; K M Bennett; Y Paulignan
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1992-09-28       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task.

Authors:  E A Franz; H N Zelaznik; G McCabe
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1991-09

4.  The coordination patterns observed when two hands reach-to-grasp separate objects.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Bingham; Kirstie Hughes; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 2. The effects of changing object size.

Authors:  Y Paulignan; M Jeannerod; C MacKenzie; R Marteniuk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Prehension movements and perceived object depth structure.

Authors:  U Castiello; C Bonfiglioli; K Bennett
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-05

7.  The time course of cross-talk during the simultaneous specification of bimanual movement amplitudes.

Authors:  H Heuer; W Spijkers; T Kleinsorge; H van der Loo; C Steglich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Reach to grasp: the natural response to perturbation of object size.

Authors:  U Castiello; K M Bennett; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Perturbation of a prehension movement in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  M Scarpa; U Castiello
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 10.338

10.  Visuomotor transformations affect bimanual coupling.

Authors:  Cornelia Weigelt; Simone Cardoso de Oliveira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-12-03       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  3 in total

1.  Bimanual coordination affects motor task switching.

Authors:  Brandon J Bernardin; Andrea H Mason
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Hand use for grasping in a bimanual task: evidence for different roles?

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Devon C Bryant; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The effect of endpoint congruency on bimanual transport and rotation tasks.

Authors:  Andrea H Mason; Pamela J Bryden
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.