Literature DB >> 18356103

Influence of non-level walking on pedometer accuracy.

Anthony S Leicht1, Robert G Crowther.   

Abstract

The YAMAX Digiwalker pedometer has been previously confirmed as a valid and reliable monitor during level walking, however, little is known about its accuracy during non-level walking activities or between genders. Subsequently, this study examined the influence of non-level walking and gender on pedometer accuracy. Forty-six healthy adults completed 3-min bouts of treadmill walking at their normal walking pace during 11 inclines (0-10%) while another 123 healthy adults completed walking up and down 47 stairs. During walking, participants wore a YAMAX Digiwalker SW-700 pedometer with the number of steps taken and registered by the pedometer recorded. Pedometer difference (steps registered-steps taken), net error (% of steps taken), absolute error (absolute % of steps taken) and gender were examined by repeated measures two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests. During incline walking, pedometer accuracy indices were similar between inclines and gender except for a significantly greater step difference (-7+/-5 steps vs. 1+/-4 steps) and net error (-2.4+/-1.8% for 9% vs. 0.4+/-1.2% for 2%). Step difference and net error were significantly greater during stair descent compared to stair ascent while absolute error was significantly greater during stair ascent compared to stair descent. The current study demonstrated that the YAMAX Digiwalker SW-700 pedometer exhibited good accuracy during incline walking up to 10% while it overestimated steps taken during stair ascent/descent with greater overestimation during stair descent. Stair walking activity should be documented in field studies as the YAMAX Digiwalker SW-700 pedometer overestimates this activity type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18356103     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2008.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sci Med Sport        ISSN: 1878-1861            Impact factor:   4.319


  6 in total

1.  Commentaries on Viewpoint: Expending our physical activity (measurement) budget wisely.

Authors:  Todd M Manini
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-08

Review 2.  Toward Harmonized Treadmill-Based Validation of Step-Counting Wearable Technologies: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Christopher C Moore; Aston K McCullough; Elroy J Aguiar; Scott W Ducharme; Catrine Tudor-Locke
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2020-07-11

3.  Validity of smartphone pedometer applications.

Authors:  Krystn Orr; Holly S Howe; Janine Omran; Kristina A Smith; Tess M Palmateer; Alvin E Ma; Guy Faulkner
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-11-30

4.  Accuracy of a step counter during treadmill and daily life walking by healthy adults and patients with cardiac disease.

Authors:  Charlotte Brun Thorup; Jan Jesper Andreasen; Erik Elgaard Sørensen; Mette Grønkjær; Birthe Irene Dinesen; John Hansen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Step and Distance Measurement From a Low-Cost Consumer-Based Hip and Wrist Activity Monitor: Protocol for a Validity and Reliability Assessment.

Authors:  Thomas Carlin; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-01-13

Review 6.  Associations between neighbourhood walkability and daily steps in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samantha Hajna; Nancy A Ross; Anne-Sophie Brazeau; Patrick Bélisle; Lawrence Joseph; Kaberi Dasgupta
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.