BACKGROUND: Both the absolute and the percent of mammographic density are strong and independent risk factors for breast cancer. Previously, we showed that the association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk tended to be weaker in African American than in White U.S. women. Because African American women have a larger breast size, we assessed whether the association between mammographic density and breast cancer was less apparent in large than in small breasts. METHODS: We assessed mammographic density on mammograms from 348 African American and 507 White women, 479 breast cancer patients and 376 control subjects, from a case-control study conducted in Los Angeles County. We estimated odds ratios (OR) for breast cancer with increasing mammographic density, and the analyses were stratified by mammographic breast area. RESULTS: Median breast size was 168.4 cm2 in African American women and 121.7 cm2 in White women (P for difference <0.001). For absolute density, adjusted ORs (95% confidence intervals) per increase of 10 cm2 were 1.32 (1.13-1.54), 1.14 (1.03-1.26), and 1.02 (0.98-1.07) in the first, second, and third tertiles of breast area, respectively (P for effect modification by breast area = 0.005). The results for percent density were similar although weaker; adjusted ORs per 10% increase (absolute value) in percent density were 1.22 (1.05-1.40), 1.22 (1.06-1.41), and 1.03 (0.90-1.18 P for effect modification by breast area = 0.34). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the association between mammographic density and breast cancer may be weaker in women with larger breasts.
BACKGROUND: Both the absolute and the percent of mammographic density are strong and independent risk factors for breast cancer. Previously, we showed that the association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk tended to be weaker in African American than in White U.S. women. Because African American women have a larger breast size, we assessed whether the association between mammographic density and breast cancer was less apparent in large than in small breasts. METHODS: We assessed mammographic density on mammograms from 348 African American and 507 White women, 479 breast cancerpatients and 376 control subjects, from a case-control study conducted in Los Angeles County. We estimated odds ratios (OR) for breast cancer with increasing mammographic density, and the analyses were stratified by mammographic breast area. RESULTS: Median breast size was 168.4 cm2 in African American women and 121.7 cm2 in White women (P for difference <0.001). For absolute density, adjusted ORs (95% confidence intervals) per increase of 10 cm2 were 1.32 (1.13-1.54), 1.14 (1.03-1.26), and 1.02 (0.98-1.07) in the first, second, and third tertiles of breast area, respectively (P for effect modification by breast area = 0.005). The results for percent density were similar although weaker; adjusted ORs per 10% increase (absolute value) in percent density were 1.22 (1.05-1.40), 1.22 (1.06-1.41), and 1.03 (0.90-1.18 P for effect modification by breast area = 0.34). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the association between mammographic density and breast cancer may be weaker in women with larger breasts.
Authors: Shannon M Conroy; Christy G Woolcott; Karin R Koga; Celia Byrne; Chisato Nagata; Giske Ursin; Celine M Vachon; Martin J Yaffe; Ian Pagano; Gertraud Maskarinec Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2011-09-17 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Paula Berstad; Ralph J Coates; Leslie Bernstein; Suzanne G Folger; Kathleen E Malone; Polly A Marchbanks; Linda K Weiss; Jonathan M Liff; Jill A McDonald; Brian L Strom; Michael S Simon; Dennis Deapen; Michael F Press; Ronald T Burkman; Robert Spirtas; Giske Ursin Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-05-25 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Stacey E Alexeeff; Nnaemeka U Odo; Jafi A Lipson; Ninah Achacoso; Joseph H Rothstein; Martin J Yaffe; Rhea Y Liang; Luana Acton; Valerie McGuire; Alice S Whittemore; Daniel L Rubin; Weiva Sieh; Laurel A Habel Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-07-11 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Anne Marie McCarthy; Brad M Keller; Lauren M Pantalone; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Marie Synnestvedt; Emily F Conant; Katrina Armstrong; Despina Kontos Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Andreas Pettersson; Susan E Hankinson; Walter C Willett; Pagona Lagiou; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Rulla M Tamimi Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2011-10-21 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Martijn Verheus; Gertraud Maskarinec; Eva Erber; Jana S Steude; Jeffrey Killeen; Brenda Y Hernandez; J Mark Cline Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-06-13 Impact factor: 4.430