Literature DB >> 18348596

A pilot study of cranial electrotherapy stimulation for generalized anxiety disorder.

Alexander Bystritsky1, Lauren Kerwin, Jamie Feusner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) is a noninvasive procedure that has been used for decades in the United States to treat anxiety, depression, and insomnia in the general population. Whether CES is an effective treatment for patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) has not previously been explored. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of CES in alleviating anxiety in patients with DSM-IV-diagnosed GAD.
METHOD: Twelve patients from 29 to 58 years of age with a DSM-IV diagnosis of GAD were enrolled from August 2005 to March 2006 through the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Anxiety Disorders Program. Cranial electrotherapy stimulation treatment was administered for 6 weeks using the Alpha-Stim Stress Control System at 0.5-Hz frequency and 300-muA intensity. The primary efficacy measures were the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) and the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scale. Response to treatment was defined as a reduction of 50% or more on the HAM-A and a CGI-I score of 1 or 2 ("much improved" or "very much improved," respectively).
RESULTS: Cranial electrotherapy stimulation was associated with a significant decrease in HAM-A scores (t = 3.083, p = .01). At endpoint, 6 patients (50% of the intent-to-treat sample and 67% of completers) had a 50% decrease in HAM-A score and a CGI-I score of 1 or 2. One additional patient significantly improved in anxiety scores but did not meet criteria for response. Adverse events were generally mild in severity, mostly consisting of headache and nausea.
CONCLUSION: This preliminary study suggests that CES may reduce symptoms of anxiety in GAD. We hope that these preliminary results will encourage further research to explore the use of CES in clinical settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00539357.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18348596     DOI: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  17 in total

Review 1.  Somatic treatments for mood disorders.

Authors:  Moacyr A Rosa; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Transdiagnostic dimensions of anxiety and depression moderate motivation-related brain networks during goal maintenance.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Spielberg; Gregory A Miller; Stacie L Warren; Bradley P Sutton; Marie Banich; Wendy Heller
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 6.505

Review 3.  Classification of methods in transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) and evolving strategy from historical approaches to contemporary innovations.

Authors:  Berkan Guleyupoglu; Pedro Schestatsky; Dylan Edwards; Felipe Fregni; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Effects of low-field magnetic stimulation on brain glucose metabolism.

Authors:  Nora D Volkow; Dardo Tomasi; Gene-Jack Wang; Joanna S Fowler; Frank Telang; Ruiliang Wang; Dave Alexoff; Jean Logan; Christopher Wong; Kith Pradhan; Elisabeth C Caparelli; Yeming Ma; Millard Jayne
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Psychometric evaluation of a radio electric auricular treatment for stress related disorders: a double-blinded, placebo-controlled controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Salvatore Rinaldi; Vania Fontani; Lucia Aravagli; Piero Mannu
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Auricular transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in depressed patients: a randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Ernst Hein; Magdalena Nowak; Olga Kiess; Teresa Biermann; Kristina Bayerlein; Johannes Kornhuber; Thomas Kraus
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Brain stimulation in posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  Vladan Novakovic; Leo Sher; Kyle A B Lapidus; Janet Mindes; Julia A Golier; Rachel Yehuda
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2011-10-17

8.  Supraorbital transcutaneous neurostimulation has sedative effects in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Maxime Piquet; Costantino Balestra; Simona L Sava; Jean E Schoenen
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 2.474

9.  Neuromodulation therapies and treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Khalid Saad Al-Harbi; Naseem Akhtar Qureshi
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2012-07-13

10.  Effects of cranial electrotherapy stimulation on resting state brain activity.

Authors:  Jamie D Feusner; Sarah Madsen; Teena D Moody; Cara Bohon; Emily Hembacher; Susan Y Bookheimer; Alexander Bystritsky
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.