Literature DB >> 18347905

Benefit finding in response to BRCA1/2 testing.

Carissa A Low1, Julienne E Bower, Lorna Kwan, Joyce Seldon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Undergoing genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations may be accompanied by elevated worry and distress, but the potential for the experience to catalyze positive psychological and life changes has not been studied.
PURPOSE: This study was designed to examine the relationship between mutation carrier status, personal cancer history, and the potential positive impact of genetic testing (i.e., benefit finding). We also tested two predictors of benefit finding (BF) derived from the theoretical and empirical literature on positive outcomes of stress: impact of the experience and approach-oriented coping.
METHODS: Women undergoing genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations (n = 108) completed questionnaires assessing test-related distress, approach-oriented coping, and BF after receipt of test results. BRCA1/2 status was determined from genetic test results and personal cancer history from interviews conducted with study participants before testing.
RESULTS: Reports of BF in this sample were highly variable, as some women did not perceive the testing experience as having any noticeable effect on their lives, whereas others reported positive changes similar to those observed in cancer patients (e.g., significantly improved relationships, greater appreciation for life). Contrary to hypotheses, women who tested positive for BRCA1/2 did not report higher levels of BF in response to genetic testing than those who tested negative. However, BF scores were elevated among mutation carriers who had a previous cancer diagnosis. As predicted, test-related distress and approach-oriented coping were also positively associated with BF, and approach-oriented coping mediated the relationship between carrier status x cancer history and BF.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that positive life changes can occur among women who test positive for BRCA1/2 mutations, particularly cancer survivors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18347905     DOI: 10.1007/s12160-007-9004-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  13 in total

1.  Interpersonal Sensitivity and Sexual Functioning in Young Men with Testicular Cancer: the Moderating Role of Coping.

Authors:  Michael A Hoyt; Connor McCann; Mirko Savone; Christopher S Saigal; Annette L Stanton
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Patient responses to genetic information: studies of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes identify issues for use of genetic testing in nephrology practice.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.299

Review 3.  Personal utility in genomic testing: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Jennefer N Kohler; Erin Turbitt; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Self-Regulation Principles Underlying Risk Perception and Decision Making within the Context of Genomic Testing.

Authors:  Linda D Cameron; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Ellen Peters; Jennifer M Taber; William M P Klein
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2017-05-05

5.  Impact of Panel Gene Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer on Patients.

Authors:  Heidi S Lumish; Hallie Steinfeld; Carrie Koval; Donna Russo; Elana Levinson; Julia Wynn; James Duong; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Patient experience and utility of genetic information: a cross-sectional study among patients tested for cancer susceptibility and thrombophilia.

Authors:  Elvira D'Andrea; Tyra Lagerberg; Corrado De Vito; Erica Pitini; Carolina Marzuillo; Azzurra Massimi; Maria Rosaria Vacchio; Paola Grammatico; Paolo Villari
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms in double-stranded DNA repair pathway genes and familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Mary E Sehl; Lucy R Langer; Jeanette C Papp; Lorna Kwan; Joyce L Seldon; Geovanni Arellano; Jean Reiss; Elaine F Reed; Sugandha Dandekar; Yael Korin; Janet S Sinsheimer; Zuo-Feng Zhang; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Cognitive and emotional factors predicting decisional conflict among high-risk breast cancer survivors who receive uninformative BRCA1/2 results.

Authors:  Christine Rini; Suzanne C O'Neill; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Rachel E Goldsmith; Lina Jandorf; Karen Brown; Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Cancer screening and genetics: a tale of two paradigms.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Heather M Edwards; Muin J Khoury; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Psychological Distress, Anxiety, and Depression of Cancer-Affected BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Johanna Ringwald; Christina Wochnowski; Kristin Bosse; Katrin Elisabeth Giel; Norbert Schäffeler; Stephan Zipfel; Martin Teufel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.