Literature DB >> 18346681

Usefulness of prognostic indices in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Robert James Atkinson1, David Paul Hurlstone.   

Abstract

Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage remains a significant cause of hospital admission, with mortality rates up to 14%. In order to standardise and improve care, various scoring systems (e.g. Rockall, Blatchford and Baylor) have been developed to identify those individuals at high risk of requiring treatment (transfusion, endoscopic or surgical intervention) or of re-bleeding or death. There is also increasing interest in the utilisation of scoring systems to identify individuals at low risk of complications, as these may be discharged early, possibly with outpatient endoscopy. Most scoring systems are developed to predict outcomes in non-variceal bleeding. However, several indices are used to predict the outcome of advanced liver disease, including Child-Pugh and the Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD). This chapter reviews all these aspects of the various scoring systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18346681     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2007.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1521-6918            Impact factor:   3.043


  15 in total

1.  Rockall score in predicting outcomes of elderly patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Chang-Yuan Wang; Jian Qin; Jing Wang; Chang-Yi Sun; Tao Cao; Dan-Dan Zhu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  One fifth of hospitalizations for peptic ulcer-related bleeding are potentially preventable.

Authors:  Ray Boyapati; Sim Ye Ong; Bei Ye; Anuk Kruavit; Nora Lee; Rhys Vaughan; Sanjay Nandurkar; Peter Gibson; Mayur Garg
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Endoscopy for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Ki Bae Kim; Soon Man Yoon; Sei Jin Youn
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2014-07-28

4.  [Surgical intervention in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding].

Authors:  R Czymek; A Grossmann; U Roblick; T Jungbluth; F Fischer; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Marc Bardou; Dalila Benhaberou-Brun; Isabelle Le Ray; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  Comparison of Two Scoring Systems in Predicting Outcomes in Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Taiwanese Population.

Authors:  Cheng-Hsien Wang; Ming-Szu Hung; Kuan-Han Wu; Yi-Chuan Chen
Journal:  J Acute Med       Date:  2017-09-01

7.  Melaena with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: a case report.

Authors:  Sayantan Bhattacharya; Sunondo R Mahapatra; Ramlal Nangalia; Amitabh Palit; John R Morrissey; Ernie Ruban; Vijay Jadhav; George Mathew
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2010-02-08

8.  The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and the multidimensional approach. A new look at the older patient with gastroenterological disorders.

Authors:  Alberto Pilotto; Filomena Addante; Grazia D'Onofrio; Daniele Sancarlo; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.043

9.  Predictive factors for rebleeding and death in alcoholic cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Jake E J Krige; Urda K Kotze; Greg Distiller; John M Shaw; Philippus C Bornman
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Use of the Complete Rockall Score and the Forrest Classification to Assess Outcome in Patients with Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Subject to After-hours Endoscopy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  A Giese; C Grunwald; J Zieren; N J Büchner; B F Henning
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 0.171

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.