Literature DB >> 25303191

Use of the Complete Rockall Score and the Forrest Classification to Assess Outcome in Patients with Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Subject to After-hours Endoscopy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

A Giese1, C Grunwald2, J Zieren3, N J Büchner4, B F Henning2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the usefulness of the Forrest classification and the complete Rockall score with customary cut-off values for assessing the risk of adverse events in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGI-B) subject to after-hours emergency oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (E-EGD) within six hours after admission.
METHODS: The medical records of patients with non-variceal UGI-B proven by after-hours endoscopy were analysed. For 'high risk' situations (Forrest stage Ia-IIb/complete Rockall score > 2), univariate analysis was conducted to evaluate odds ratio for reaching the study endpoints (30-day and one-year mortality, re-bleeding, hospital stay ≥ 3 days).
RESULTS: During the study period (75 months), 86 cases (85 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Patients' age was 66.36 ± 14.38 years; 60.5% were male. Mean duration of hospital stay was 15.21 ± 19.24 days. Mortality rate was 16.7% (30 days) and 32.9% (one year); 14% of patients re-bled. Univariate analysis of post-endoscopic Rockall score ≥ 2 showed an odds ratio of 6.09 for death within 30 days (p = 0.04). No other significant correlations were found.
CONCLUSION: In patients with UGI-B subject to after-hours endoscopy, a 'high-risk' Rockall score permits an estimation of the risk of death within 30 days but not of re-bleeding. A 'high-risk' Forrest score is not significantly associated with the study endpoints.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25303191      PMCID: PMC4655643          DOI: 10.7727/wimj.2012.316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West Indian Med J        ISSN: 0043-3144            Impact factor:   0.171


  18 in total

1.  Validation of the Rockall scoring system for outcomes from non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a Canadian setting.

Authors:  Robert-A Enns; Yves-M Gagnon; Alan-N Barkun; David Armstrong; Jamie-C Gregor; Richard-N Fedorak
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Outpatient management for low-risk nonvariceal upper GI bleeding: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Livio Cipolletta; Maria Antonia Bianco; Gianluca Rotondano; Riccardo Marmo; Roberto Piscopo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Bleeding peptic ulcer.

Authors:  L Laine; W L Peterson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-09-15       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Authors:  T A Rockall; R F Logan; H B Devlin; T C Northfield
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Prospective validation of the Rockall risk scoring system for upper GI hemorrhage in subgroups of patients with varices and peptic ulcers.

Authors:  D S Sanders; M J Carter; R J Goodchap; S S Cross; D C Gleeson; A J Lobo
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Can pre-endoscopic assessment predict active upper gastrointestinal bleeding? A retrospective study in patients with symptoms of upper gastrointestinal bleeding outside regular working hours.

Authors:  Arnd Giese; Catharina Grunwald; Jurgen Zieren; Nikolaus J Buchner; Bernhard F Henning
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec

7.  Validation of the Rockall risk scoring system in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  E M Vreeburg; C B Terwee; P Snel; E A Rauws; J F Bartelsman; J H Meulen; G N Tytgat
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.

Authors:  I-Chuan Chen; Ming-Szu Hung; Te-Fa Chiu; Jih-Chang Chen; Cheng-Ting Hsiao
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.469

9.  Comparison of three different risk scoring systems in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  L Camellini; A Merighi; C Pagnini; F Azzolini; S Guazzetti; A Scarcelli; F Manenti; G P Rigo
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.088

10.  Differentiation between patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding who need early urgent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and those who do not. A prospective study.

Authors:  Adam B Adamopoulos; Nikolaos M Baibas; Stamatis P Efstathiou; Dimitrios I Tsioulos; Athanasios G Mitromaras; Amalia A Tsami; Theodore D Mountokalakis
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.566

View more
  2 in total

1.  Risk factors of poor prognosis and impairment of activities of daily living in patients with hemorrhagic gastroduodenal ulcers.

Authors:  Junya Arai; Jun Kato; Nobuo Toda; Ken Kurokawa; Chikako Shibata; Shigeyuki Kurosaki; Kazuyoshi Funato; Mayuko Kondo; Kaoru Takagi; Kentaro Kojima; Takamasa Ohki; Michiharu Seki; Kazumi Tagawa
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Simple risk factors to predict urgent endoscopy in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding pre-endoscopically.

Authors:  Jianzong Wang; Duanming Hu; Wen Tang; Chuanyin Hu; Qin Lu; Juan Li; Jianhong Zhu; Liming Xu; Zhenyu Sui; Mingjie Qian; Shaofeng Wang; Guojian Yin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.