Literature DB >> 18345986

Mid-fusiform activation during object discrimination reflects the process of differentiating structural descriptions.

Xun Liu1, Nicholas A Steinmetz, Alison B Farley, Charles D Smith, Jane E Joseph.   

Abstract

The present study explored constraints on mid-fusiform activation during object discrimination. In three experiments, participants performed a matching task on simple line configurations, nameable objects, three dimensional (3-D) shapes, and colors. Significant bilateral mid-fusiform activation emerged when participants matched objects and 3-D shapes, as compared to when they matched two-dimensional (2-D) line configurations and colors, indicating that the mid-fusiform is engaged more strongly for processing structural descriptions (e.g., comparing 3-D volumetric shape) than perceptual descriptions (e.g., comparing 2-D or color information). In two of the experiments, the same mid-fusiform regions were also modulated by the degree of structural similarity between stimuli, implicating a role for the mid-fusiform in fine differentiation of similar visual object representations. Importantly, however, this process of fine differentiation occurred at the level of structural, but not perceptual, descriptions. Moreover, mid-fusiform activity was more robust when participants matched shape compared to color information using the identical stimuli, indicating that activity in the mid-fusiform gyrus is not driven by specific stimulus properties, but rather by the process of distinguishing stimuli based on shape information. Taken together, these findings further clarify the nature of object processing in the mid-fusiform gyrus. This region is engaged specifically in structural differentiation, a critical component process of object recognition and categorization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18345986      PMCID: PMC2675283          DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  41 in total

1.  Viewpoint-invariant and viewpoint-dependent object recognition in dissociable neural subsystems.

Authors:  E D Burgund; C J Marsolek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

2.  Natural and manufactured objects activate the fusiform face area.

Authors:  Jane E Joseph; Ann D Gathers
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-05-24       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Functional neuroimaging studies of category specificity in object recognition: a critical review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J E Joseph
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Cortical regions associated with different aspects of object recognition performance.

Authors:  Jane E Joseph; Alison B Farley
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  The visual what for area: words and pictures in the left fusiform gyrus.

Authors:  Randi Starrfelt; Christian Gerlach
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Semantic versus perceptual influences of color in object recognition.

Authors:  J E Joseph; D R Proffitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Functional architecture in monkey inferotemporal cortex revealed by in vivo optical imaging.

Authors:  G Wang; M Tanifuji; K Tanaka
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.304

8.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Prosopagnosia: anatomic basis and behavioral mechanisms.

Authors:  A R Damasio; H Damasio; G W Van Hoesen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex.

Authors:  R Malach; J B Reppas; R R Benson; K K Kwong; H Jiang; W A Kennedy; P J Ledden; T J Brady; B R Rosen; R B Tootell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  7 in total

1.  Relationship between regional atrophy rates and cognitive decline in mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Carrie R McDonald; Lusineh Gharapetian; Linda K McEvoy; Christine Fennema-Notestine; Donald J Hagler; Dominic Holland; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.673

2.  Contributions of low and high spatial frequency processing to impaired object recognition circuitry in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Daniel J Calderone; Matthew J Hoptman; Antígona Martínez; Sangeeta Nair-Collins; Cristina J Mauro; Moshe Bar; Daniel C Javitt; Pamela D Butler
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Functional evaluation of hidden figures object analysis in children with autistic disorder.

Authors:  Krisztina L Malisza; Christine Clancy; Deborah Shiloff; Derek Foreman; Jeanette Holden; Cheryl Jones; K Paulson; Randy Summers; C T Yu; Albert E Chudley
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2011-01

4.  Process and domain specificity in regions engaged for face processing: an fMRI study of perceptual differentiation.

Authors:  Heather R Collins; Xun Zhu; Ramesh S Bhatt; Jonathan D Clark; Jane E Joseph
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Automatic Processing of Numerosity in Human Neocortex Evidenced by Occipital and Parietal Neuromagnetic Responses.

Authors:  Amandine Van Rinsveld; Vincent Wens; Mathieu Guillaume; Anthony Beuel; Wim Gevers; Xavier De Tiège; Alain Content
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-04-07

6.  Can you catch a liar? How negative emotions affect brain responses when lying or telling the truth.

Authors:  Alice Mado Proverbio; Maria Elide Vanutelli; Roberta Adorni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Perceptual and category processing of the Uncanny Valley hypothesis' dimension of human likeness: some methodological issues.

Authors:  Marcus Cheetham; Lutz Jancke
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 1.355

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.