CONTEXT: The valgus stress test is used clinically to assess injury to the medial knee structures in 2 positions: full extension and some degree of flexion. The amount of flexion used to "isolate" the medial collateral ligament is not consistent in the literature, but most studies have shown that stiffness of the ligaments was consistent between the limbs. OBJECTIVE: To determine (1) if the stiffness of the medial knee structures was the same bilaterally, and (2) if the stiffness was different in full extension compared with 20 degrees of knee flexion. DESIGN: Criterion standard, before-after design. SETTING: University research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Both knees of 45 healthy and active volunteers (26 females, 19 males; age = 23.2 +/- 3.96 years, height = 170.6 +/- 7.75 cm, mass = 74.2 +/- 15.14 kg) were studied. INTERVENTION(S): A valgus force of 60 N was applied to the lateral aspect of both knees in full extension and in 20 degrees of flexion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The slope of the force-strain line of the medial knee during a valgus force was calculated using the LigMaster arthrometer. RESULTS: Slope means in full extension were 16.1 +/- 3.3 (right knee) and 15.8 +/- 3.1(left knee). Means for 20 degrees of flexion were 12.2 +/- 3.1 (right) and 11.7 +/- 2.8 (left). Stiffness was greater when the knee was in full extension versus 20 degrees of flexion (t(44) = 12.04, P < .001). No difference was noted between the slopes of the 2 knees in extension (t(44) = 0.74, P = .46) or in flexion (t(44) = 1.2, P = .27). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of the contralateral knee as a control. Further, the valgus stress test should be performed in full extension and in some degree of flexion to assess the different restraining structures of the medial tibiofemoral joint.
CONTEXT: The valgus stress test is used clinically to assess injury to the medial knee structures in 2 positions: full extension and some degree of flexion. The amount of flexion used to "isolate" the medial collateral ligament is not consistent in the literature, but most studies have shown that stiffness of the ligaments was consistent between the limbs. OBJECTIVE: To determine (1) if the stiffness of the medial knee structures was the same bilaterally, and (2) if the stiffness was different in full extension compared with 20 degrees of knee flexion. DESIGN: Criterion standard, before-after design. SETTING: University research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Both knees of 45 healthy and active volunteers (26 females, 19 males; age = 23.2 +/- 3.96 years, height = 170.6 +/- 7.75 cm, mass = 74.2 +/- 15.14 kg) were studied. INTERVENTION(S): A valgus force of 60 N was applied to the lateral aspect of both knees in full extension and in 20 degrees of flexion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The slope of the force-strain line of the medial knee during a valgus force was calculated using the LigMaster arthrometer. RESULTS: Slope means in full extension were 16.1 +/- 3.3 (right knee) and 15.8 +/- 3.1(left knee). Means for 20 degrees of flexion were 12.2 +/- 3.1 (right) and 11.7 +/- 2.8 (left). Stiffness was greater when the knee was in full extension versus 20 degrees of flexion (t(44) = 12.04, P < .001). No difference was noted between the slopes of the 2 knees in extension (t(44) = 0.74, P = .46) or in flexion (t(44) = 1.2, P = .27). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of the contralateral knee as a control. Further, the valgus stress test should be performed in full extension and in some degree of flexion to assess the different restraining structures of the medial tibiofemoral joint.
Entities:
Keywords:
arthrometry; leg dominance; valgus stress
Authors: Patricia A Aronson; Joe H Gieck; Jay Hertel; Arie M Rijke; Christopher D Ingersoll Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.860