Literature DB >> 20617910

Tibiofemoral joint positioning for the valgus stress test.

Patricia A Aronson1, Joe H Gieck, Jay Hertel, Arie M Rijke, Christopher D Ingersoll.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Recommendations on the positioning of the tibiofemoral joint during a valgus stress test to optimize isolation of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) from other medial joint structures vary in the literature. If a specific amount of flexion could be identified as optimally isolating the MCL, teaching and using the technique would be more consistent in clinical application.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the angle of tibiofemoral joint flexion between 0 degrees and 20 degrees that causes a difference in the slope of the force-strain line when measuring the resistance to a valgus force applied to the joint.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: University research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Twelve healthy volunteers (6 men, 6 women: age = 26.4 +/- 5.6 years, height = 170.9 +/- 8.4 cm, mass = 75.01 +/- 14.6 kg). INTERVENTION(S): Using an arthrometer, we applied a valgus force, over a range of 60 N, to the tibiofemoral joint in 0 degrees , 5 degrees , 10 degrees , 15 degrees , and 20 degrees of flexion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Force-strain measurements were obtained for 5 positions of tibiofemoral joint flexion.
RESULTS: As knee flexion angle increased, slope values decreased (F(4,44) = 17.6, P < .001). The slope at full extension was not different from that at 5 degrees of flexion, but it was different from the slopes at angles greater than 10 degrees of flexion. Similarly, the slope at 5 degrees of flexion was not different from that at 10 degrees of flexion, but it was different from the slopes at 15 degrees and 20 degrees of flexion. Further, the slope at 10 degrees of flexion was not different from that at 15 degrees or 20 degrees of flexion. Finally, the slope at 15 degrees of flexion was not different from that at 20 degrees of flexion.
CONCLUSIONS: When performing the manual valgus stress test, the clinician should fully extend the tibiofemoral joint or flex it to 5 degrees to assess all resisting medial tibiofemoral joint structures and again at 15 degrees to 20 degrees of joint flexion to further assess the MCL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20617910      PMCID: PMC2902029          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-45.4.357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  26 in total

1.  Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes: why are women more susceptible?

Authors:  J L Moeller; M M Lamb
Journal:  Phys Sportsmed       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.241

2.  Managing collateral ligament tears of the knee.

Authors:  R J Meislin
Journal:  Phys Sportsmed       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.241

3.  Strain in the medial collateral ligament of the human knee under single and combined loads.

Authors:  M L Hull; G S Berns; H Varma; H A Patterson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  The prime static stabilizer of the medical side of the knee.

Authors:  L A Warren; J L Marshall; F Girgis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The role of the posterior oblique ligament in repairs of acute medial (collateral) ligament tears of the knee.

Authors:  J C Hughston; A F Eilers
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Medial collateral ligament injuries of the knee: ultrasonographic findings.

Authors:  J I Lee; I S Song; Y B Jung; Y G Kim; C H Wang; H Yu; Y S Kim; K S Kim; T L Pope
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Acute Knee Injuries; On-the-Field and Sideline Evaluation.

Authors:  R F Laprade; F Wentorf
Journal:  Phys Sportsmed       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.241

8.  Medial collateral ligament injuries of the knee: a rationale for treatment.

Authors:  J F Fetto; J L Marshall
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Medial restraints to anterior-posterior motion of the knee.

Authors:  D Sullivan; I M Levy; S Sheskier; P A Torzilli; R F Warren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Combined injuries of the anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligaments of the knee. Effect of treatment on stability and function of the joint.

Authors:  D Hillard-Sembell; D M Daniel; M L Stone; B E Dobson; D C Fithian
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  3 in total

1.  Medial tibiofemoral-joint stiffness in males and females across the lifespan.

Authors:  Patricia Aronson; Arie Rijke; Jay Hertel; Christopher D Ingersoll
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  PHYSICAL THERAPY MANAGEMENT OF ICE HOCKEY ATHLETES: FROM THE RINK TO THE CLINIC AND BACK.

Authors:  Christopher R Wolfinger; Todd E Davenport
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-06

3.  The measurement of medial knee gap width using ultrasound.

Authors:  Laura C Slane; Josh A Slane; Lennart Scheys
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 3.067

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.