Literature DB >> 18345316

Hepatic resection using a bipolar vessel sealing device: technical and histological analysis.

Fabrizio Romano1, Mattia Garancini, Roberto Caprotti, Giorgio Bovo, Matteo Conti, Elisa Perego, Franco Uggeri.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Blood loss and bile leakage are well-known risk factors for morbidity and mortality during liver resection. Bleeding usually occurs during parenchymal transection, and surgical technique should be considered an important factor in preventing intraoperative and postoperative complications.
OBJECTIVE: Many approaches and devices have been developed to limit bleeding and bile leakage. The aim of the present study was to determine whether a bipolar vessel sealing device allows a safe and careful liver transection without routine inflow occlusion, achieving a satisfactory hemostasis and bile stasis, thus reducing blood loss and bile leak and related complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 50 consecutive patients (24 males, 26 females, with a mean age of 57 years) underwent major and minor hepatic resections using a bipolar vessel sealing device. A clamp crushing technique followed by energy application was used to perform the parenchymal transection. Inflow occlusion was used when necessary to control blood loss but not as a routine. No other devices were applied to achieve hemostasis.
RESULTS: The instrument was effective in 45 patients and failed to achieve hemostasis in 5 cases, all of whom had a cirrhotic liver. Median blood loss was 490 ml (range 100-2500 ml) and intraoperative blood transfusions were required in eight cases (16%). Mean operative time was 178 min (range 50-315 min). Inflow occlusion was necessary in 16 (32%) patients. The postoperative complication rate was 24%, with a postoperative hemorrhage in a cirrhotic patient. There was no clinical evidence of bile leak or procedure-related abdominal abscess.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that the device is a useful tool in standard liver resection, achieving good hemostasis and bile stasis in patients with normal liver parenchyma, but its use should be avoided in cirrhotic patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bile leakage; bipolar vessel sealing device; blood loss; liver resection

Year:  2007        PMID: 18345316      PMCID: PMC2225510          DOI: 10.1080/13651820701504181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  38 in total

1.  Hepatic resection using the harmonic scalpel.

Authors:  H Sugo; Y Mikami; F Matsumoto; H Tsumura; Y Watanabe; K Kojima; S Futagawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Biliary complications during liver resection.

Authors:  C M Lam; C M Lo; C L Liu; S T Fan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Current status of hepatic resection.

Authors:  Peter J Allen; William R Jarnagin
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2003

4.  Use of a bipolar vessel-sealing device for parenchymal transection during liver surgery.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; Jeffrey A Drebin; David Linehan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Bloodless hepatectomy technique.

Authors:  G Navarra; D Spalding; D Zacharoulis; J P Nicholls; S Kirby; I Costa; N A Habib
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 6.  Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Authors:  F Serracino-Inglott; N A Habib; R T Mathie
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Continuous versus intermittent portal triad clamping for liver resection: a controlled study.

Authors:  J Belghiti; R Noun; R Malafosse; P Jagot; A Sauvanet; F Pierangeli; J Marty; O Farges
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Hepatic resections using a water-cooled, high-density, monopolar device: a new technology for safer surgery.

Authors:  Isidoro Di Carlo; Francesco Barbagallo; Adriana Toro; Maria Sofia; Tommaso Guastella; Ferdinando Latteri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Bloodless liver resection using the monopolar floating ball plus ligasure diathermy: preliminary results of 16 liver resections.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Sakamoto; Junji Yamamoto; Norihiro Kokudo; Makoto Seki; Tomoo Kosuge; Toshiharu Yamaguchi; Tetsuichiro Muto; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Influence of transfusions on perioperative and long-term outcome in patients following hepatic resection for colorectal metastases.

Authors:  David A Kooby; Jennifer Stockman; Leah Ben-Porat; Mithat Gonen; William R Jarnagin; Ronald P Dematteo; Scott Tuorto; David Wuest; Leslie H Blumgart; Yuman Fong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  12 in total

1.  Does the placement of a cystic duct tube after a hepatic resection help reduce the incidence of post-operative bile leak?

Authors:  Atsushi Nanashima; Takafumi Abo; Ayako Shibuya; Tetsuro Tominaga; Aya Matsumoto; Kazuo Tou; Masaki Kunizaki; Hiroaki Takeshita; Shigekazu Hidaka; Tomoshi Tsuchiya; Naoya Yamasaki; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Comparison of two different transection techniques in liver surgery-an experimental study in a porcine model.

Authors:  T Gehrig; G Manzini; H Fonouni; M Golriz; R Hafezi; N Rahbari; K Brand; U Hinz; B P Müller-Stich; C N Gutt; A Mehrabi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Laparoscopic liver resection using a bipolar vessel-sealing device: LigaSure.

Authors:  Douglas P Slakey
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Laparoscopic left lobe liver resection in a porcine model: a study of the efficacy and safety of different surgical techniques.

Authors:  Kristinn Eiriksson; Eiriksson Kristinn; Diddi Fors; Fors Diddi; Sten Rubertsson; Rubertsson Sten; Dag Arvidsson; Arvidsson Dag
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Opportunistic use of a Foley catheter to provide a common electrocautery with a water-irrigating channel for hepatic parenchymal transection.

Authors:  Yuzo Yamamoto; Masato Yoshioka; Go Watanabe; Hiroshi Uchinami
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Impact of energy devices during liver parenchymal transection: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Naoto Gotohda; Takeharu Yamanaka; Akio Saiura; Katsuhiko Uesaka; Masaji Hashimoto; Masaru Konishi; Kazuaki Shimada
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Impact of the VIO system in hepatic resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Shinji Itoh; Kengo Fukuzawa; Yuki Shitomi; Masahiro Okamoto; Tadahiko Kinoshita; Akinobu Taketomi; Ken Shirabe; Kenzo Wakasugi; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Utility of the Gyrus open forceps in hepatic parenchymal transection.

Authors:  Matthew R Porembka; M B Majella Doyle; Nicholas A Hamilton; Peter O Simon; Steven M Strasberg; David C Linehan; William G Hawkins
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Radiofrequency vessel-sealing system versus the clamp-crushing technique in liver transection: results of a prospective randomized study on 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Andrea Muratore; Alfredo Mellano; Giuseppe Tarantino; Patrizia Marsanic; Michele De Simone; Fabrizio Di Benedetto
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 10.  Non-vascular experimental and clinical applications of advanced bipolar radiofrequency thermofusion technology in the thorax and abdomen: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shobhit Arya; Hugh Mackenzie; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.