Literature DB >> 18814003

Laparoscopic left lobe liver resection in a porcine model: a study of the efficacy and safety of different surgical techniques.

Kristinn Eiriksson1, Eiriksson Kristinn, Diddi Fors, Fors Diddi, Sten Rubertsson, Rubertsson Sten, Dag Arvidsson, Arvidsson Dag.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic liver surgery is evolving and the best technique for dividing the liver parenchyma is currently under debate. The aim of this study was to study different techniques during a full laparoscopic lobe resection, and determine the efficacy and risks of bleeding and gas embolism.
METHODS: Sixteen pigs were randomized to two groups: group US underwent an operation with Ultracision shears (AutoSonix) and ultrasonic dissector (CUSA) and group VS with a vessel sealing system (Ligasure) and ultrasonic dissector. A left lobe resection was performed. Transesophageal endoscopic echocardiography (TEE) was used to detect gas emboli in the right side of the heart and pulmonary artery. The operations and TEE were recorded for later assessment.
RESULTS: Compared with group VS, group US exhibited significantly more intraoperative bleeding (p = 0.02), a trend towards a longer operation time (p = 0.08), and a trend towards more embolization for grade I emboli. In total, 10 of 15 animals had emboli during the operation.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that a laparoscopic left lobe resection can be performed with a combination of AutoSonix and CUSA as well as with Ligasure and CUSA instrumentation. In our hands, less bleeding was incurred with Ligasure than with AutoSonix.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18814003     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0115-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  Hepatic resection using the harmonic scalpel.

Authors:  H Sugo; Y Mikami; F Matsumoto; H Tsumura; Y Watanabe; K Kojima; S Futagawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Gas embolism during laparoscopy: a report of seven cases in patients with previous abdominal surgical history.

Authors:  V Cottin; B Delafosse; J P Viale
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Joseph F Buell; Alan J Koffron; Mark J Thomas; Steven Rudich; Michael Abecassis; E Steve Woodle
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Laparoscopic liver resection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hironori Kaneko; Sumito Takagi; Yuichiro Otsuka; Masaru Tsuchiya; Akira Tamura; Toshio Katagiri; Tetsuya Maeda; Tadaaki Shiba
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Laparoscopic parenchymal division of the liver in a porcine model: comparison of the efficacy and safety of three different techniques.

Authors:  U Jersenius; D Fors; S Rubertsson; D Arvidsson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparison between staple and vessel sealing device for parynchemal transection in laparoscopic liver surgery in a swine model.

Authors:  Reza F Saidi; Ahmad Ahad; Rossini Escobar; Ilke Nalbantoglu; Volkan Adsay; Michael J Jacobs
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Hepatic resection using a bipolar vessel sealing device: technical and histological analysis.

Authors:  Fabrizio Romano; Mattia Garancini; Roberto Caprotti; Giorgio Bovo; Matteo Conti; Elisa Perego; Franco Uggeri
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Laparoscopic liver resection for malignant liver tumors: preliminary results of a multicenter European study.

Authors:  Jean-François Gigot; David Glineur; Juan Santiago Azagra; Martine Goergen; Marc Ceuterick; Mario Morino; José Etienne; Jacques Marescaux; Didier Mutter; Ludo van Krunckelsven; Bernard Descottes; Dominique Valleix; François Lachachi; Claude Bertrand; Baudouin Mansvelt; Guy Hubens; Jean-Pierre Saey; Romain Schockmel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Fatal carbon dioxide embolism complicating attempted laparoscopic cholecystectomy--case report and literature review.

Authors:  P E Lantz; J D Smith
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.832

10.  Laparoscopic right hepatectomy: surgical technique.

Authors:  Nicholas O'Rourke; George Fielding
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  5 in total

1.  LigaSure versus CUSA for parenchymal transection during laparoscopic hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with cirrhosis: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Fei Liu; YongGang Wei; HongYu Li; WenTao Wang; TianFu Wen; Hong Wu; JiaYin Yang; MingQing Xu; Bo Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy in the semi-prone position using the intrahepatic Glissonian approach and a modified hanging maneuver to minimize intraoperative bleeding.

Authors:  Tetsuo Ikeda; Yusuke Yonemura; Naoyuki Ueda; Akira Kabashima; Ken Shirabe; Akinobu Taketomi; Tomoharu Yoshizumi; Hideaki Uchiyama; Noboru Harada; Hideki Ijichi; Yosihiro Kakeji; Masaru Morita; Shunichi Tsujitani; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Total laparoscopic liver resection in 78 patients.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Ya-Jin Chen; Chang-Zhen Shang; Hong-Wei Zhang; Ze-Jian Huang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy combined with right lateral hepatic lobectomy in pigs: surgical approach and comparative study of the inflammatory response versus open surgery.

Authors:  Hua Zhang; Jin-Jin Tong; Zhao-Nan Zhang; Hong-Bin Wang; Yong-Hong Zhang
Journal:  Vet Res Forum       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 1.054

5.  Laparoscopic left hepatectomy in swine: a safe and feasible technique.

Authors:  Hua Zhang; Tao Liu; Yue Wang; Hai-Feng Liu; Jian-Tao Zhang; Yan-Shuang Wu; Lei Lei; Hong-Bin Wang
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 1.672

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.