Literature DB >> 18345314

Role of volume outcome data in assuring quality in HPB surgery.

Bernard Langer1.   

Abstract

Many studies have shown an association between both surgeon and hospital operative procedure volumes and outcomes, particularly operative mortality. It is also recognized that volume is only one of a number of factors, including 1) surgeon training and experience, and 2) hospital resources, organization, and processes of care, which can also influence outcomes. The Surgical Oncology Program at Cancer Care Ontario has included hospital volumes in a set of standards for the conduct of major pancreatic cancer surgery, along with recommendations for surgeon training and hospital resources, organization, support services, and processes of care to encourage regionalization of major HPB surgery. Cooperation with these recommendations was encouraged by the public reporting of mortality data and by an educational program directed at both surgeons and senior administrators in Ontario hospitals with the support of the provincial health ministry. The provincial mortality rate from major pancreatic cancer surgery has decreased by more than 50% since the introduction of this program.

Entities:  

Keywords:  operative mortality; pancreatic surgery; quality improvement; surgical standards; volume outcome

Year:  2007        PMID: 18345314      PMCID: PMC2225508          DOI: 10.1080/13651820701611234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  13 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Relation between hospital surgical volume and outcome for pancreatic resection for neoplasm in a publicly funded health care system.

Authors:  M Simunovic; T To; M Theriault; B Langer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-03-09       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands.

Authors:  N Tjarda van Heek; Koert F D Kuhlmann; Rob J Scholten; Steve M M de Castro; Olivier R C Busch; Thomas M van Gulik; Huug Obertop; Dirk J Gouma
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  The effects of regionalization on clinical outcomes for a high risk surgical procedure: a study of the Whipple procedure in New York State.

Authors:  P J Imperato; R P Nenner; H A Starr; T O Will; C R Rosenberg; M B Dearie
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.852

5.  The practice guidelines development cycle: a conceptual tool for practice guidelines development and implementation.

Authors:  G P Browman; M N Levine; E A Mohide; R S Hayward; K I Pritchard; A Gafni; A Laupacis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative.

Authors:  J D Birkmeyer; E V Finlayson; C M Birkmeyer
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume.

Authors:  D J Gouma; R C van Geenen; T M van Gulik; R J de Haan; L T de Wit; O R Busch; H Obertop
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Pancreas cancer resection outcome in American University centers in 1989-1990.

Authors:  S B Edge; R E Schmieg; L K Rosenlof; M C Wilhelm
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  J A Sosa; H M Bowman; T A Gordon; E B Bass; C J Yeo; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt; J M Tielsch; J L Cameron
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Therese A Stukel; Andrea E Siewers; Philip P Goodney; David E Wennberg; F Lee Lucas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-11-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  11 in total

1.  Influence of high- and low-volume liver surgery in gallbladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Thorsten Oliver Goetze; Vittorio Paolucci
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Peri-operative blood transfusion and operative time are quality indicators for pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Chad G Ball; Henry A Pitt; Molly E Kilbane; Elijah Dixon; Francis R Sutherland; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  The impact of a new hepatopancreatobiliary surgery program on the management of pancreatic cancer at Health Sciences North

Authors:  Luke Hartford; Véronique Doucet; Julie Ramkumar; Ken Leslie; Jeffrey Shum; Kengo Asai
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Gastrectomy case volume and textbook outcome: an analysis of the Population Registry of Esophageal and Stomach Tumours of Ontario (PRESTO).

Authors:  Jordan Levy; Vaibhav Gupta; Elmira Amirazodi; Catherine Allen-Ayodabo; Naheed Jivraj; Yunni Jeong; Laura E Davis; Alyson L Mahar; Charles De Mestral; Olli Saarela; Natalie Coburn
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Determination of factors predictive of outcome for patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy of pancreatic head ductal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Gareth Eeson; Nicolas Chang; Colleen E McGahan; Fareeza Khurshed; Andrzej K Buczkowski; Charles H Scudamore; Garth L Warnock; Stephen W Chung
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  What to expect when you're expecting a hepatopancreatobiliary surgeon: self-reported experiences of HPB surgeons from different training pathways.

Authors:  Susanne G Warner; Adnan A Alseidi; Johnny Hong; Timothy M Pawlik; Rebecca M Minter
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Centralization of cancer surgery: implications for patient access to optimal care.

Authors:  Karyn B Stitzenberg; Elin R Sigurdson; Brian L Egleston; Russell B Starkey; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Quality improvement of pancreatic surgery by centralization in the western part of the Netherlands.

Authors:  Gea A Gooiker; Lydia G M van der Geest; Michel W J M Wouters; Marieke Vonk; Tom M Karsten; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Bert A Bonsing
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Getting going: Incorporating ultrasound into an HPB practice.

Authors:  Chad G Ball
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2022-02-01

10.  The view from 10,000 procedures: technical tips and wisdom from master pancreatic surgeons to avoid hemorrhage during pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Chad G Ball; Elijah Dixon; Charles M Vollmer; Thomas J Howard
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.