Literature DB >> 11960901

Dynamics of visual feature analysis and object-level processing in face versus letter-string perception.

A Tarkiainen1, P L Cornelissen, R Salmelin.   

Abstract

Neurones in the human inferior occipitotemporal cortex respond to specific categories of images, such as numbers, letters and faces, within 150-200 ms. Here we identify the locus in time when stimulus-specific analysis emerges by comparing the dynamics of face and letter-string perception in the same 10 individuals. An ideal paradigm was provided by our previous study on letter-strings, in which noise-masking of stimuli revealed putative visual feature processing at 100 ms around the occipital midline followed by letter-string-specific activation at 150 ms in the left inferior occipitotemporal cortex. In the present study, noise-masking of cartoon-like faces revealed that the response at 100 ms increased linearly with the visual complexity of the images, a result that was similar for faces and letter-strings. By 150 ms, faces and letter-strings had entered their own stimulus-specific processing routes in the inferior occipitotemporal cortex, with identical timing and large spatial overlap. However, letter-string analysis lateralized to the left hemisphere, whereas face processing occurred more bilaterally or with right-hemisphere preponderance. The inferior occipitotemporal activations at approximately 150 ms, which take place after the visual feature analysis at approximately 100 ms, are likely to represent a general object-level analysis stage that acts as a rapid gateway to higher cognitive processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11960901     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  51 in total

1.  Changes in corticospinal motor excitability induced by non-motor linguistic tasks.

Authors:  I Papathanasiou; S R Filipović; R Whurr; J C Rothwell; M Jahanshahi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visual recognition of faces, objects, and words using degraded stimuli: where and when it occurs.

Authors:  Alan J Pegna; Asaid Khateb; Christoph M Michel; Theodor Landis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The neurobiology of adaptive learning in reading: a contrast of different training conditions.

Authors:  Rebecca Sandak; W Einar Mencl; Stephen J Frost; Jay G Rueckl; Leonard Katz; Dina L Moore; Stephanie A Mason; Robert K Fulbright; R Todd Constable; Kenneth R Pugh
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 4.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of word processing in the human cortex.

Authors:  Ksenija Marinković
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.519

5.  Dynamic causal modeling of spatiotemporal integration of phonological and semantic processes: an electroencephalographic study.

Authors:  Gaëtan Yvert; Marcela Perrone-Bertolotti; Monica Baciu; Olivier David
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Fixation to features and neural processing of facial expressions in a gender discrimination task.

Authors:  Karly N Neath; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  The time course of visual influences in letter recognition.

Authors:  Sylvain Madec; Kévin Le Goff; Stéphanie K Riès; Thierry Legou; Guillaume Rousselet; Pierre Courrieu; F-Xavier Alario; Jonathan Grainger; Arnaud Rey
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Structural connectivity patterns associated with the putative visual word form area and children's reading ability.

Authors:  Qiuyun Fan; Adam W Anderson; Nicole Davis; Laurie E Cutting
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  The time and space of lexicality: a neuromagnetic view.

Authors:  Tony W Wilson; Arthur C Leuthold; Scott M Lewis; Apostolos P Georgopoulos; Patricia J Pardo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Are There Separate Neural Systems for Spelling? New Insights into the Role of Rules and Memory in Spelling from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Norton; Ioulia Kovelman; Laura-Ann Petitto
Journal:  Mind Brain Educ       Date:  2007-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.