Literature DB >> 15028449

Do younger men have better biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy?

Stephen J Freedland1, Joseph C Presti, Christopher J Kane, William J Aronson, Martha K Terris, Frederick Dorey, Christopher L Amling.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between age and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (RP), controlling for the year of surgery. Prior studies have suggested that younger men have lower prostate-specific antigen recurrence rates after RP, although none of the prior studies had controlled for the year of surgery.
METHODS: We examined the data from 1753 men treated with RP between 1988 and 2002 at five equal access medical centers. We compared age, as a categorical variable according to decade of life (50 years old or younger, 51 to 60, 61 to 70, and older than 70 years), with the clinical and pathologic variables at RP, as well as the time to biochemical recurrence, using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: Age was significantly related to the year of surgery, with the more recently treated patients being younger than less recently treated patients (P <0.001). After controlling for the year of surgery, the younger men had smaller prostates, fewer high-grade tumors on biopsy, and less lymph node metastasis, but a greater percentage of cores with cancer. On multivariate analysis, men 50 years old or younger had significantly lower recurrence rates than did the older men. Moreover, men older than 70 years had significantly greater prostate-specific antigen failure rates than men aged 51 to 70 years or men aged 50 years or younger.
CONCLUSIONS: The average age of men undergoing RP has decreased with time. Independent of this, young men have more favorable outcomes after RP than older men. Continued screening to detect prostate cancer among younger men when it is most curable appears warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15028449     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.10.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  18 in total

1.  Tumor characteristics, oncological and functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy in very young men ≤ 45 years of age.

Authors:  Derya Tilki; Valentin Maurer; Raisa S Pompe; Felix K Chun; Felix Preisser; Alexander Haese; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Philipp Mandel
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Younger patients have poorer biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sung Kyu Hong; Jung Soo Nam; Woong Na; Jong Jin Oh; Cheol Yong Yoon; Chang Wook Jeong; Hyun June Kim; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Outcomes after radical prostatectomy among men who are candidates for active surveillance: results from the SEARCH database.

Authors:  Christopher J Kane; Ronald Im; Christopher L Amling; Joseph C Presti; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  The implications of prostate-specific antigen density to predict clinically significant prostate cancer in men ≤ 50 years.

Authors:  Takeo Kosaka; Ryuichi Mizuno; Toshiaki Shinojima; Akira Miyajima; Eiji Kikuchi; Nobuyuki Tanaka; Kazunobu Shinoda; Shinya Morita; Shuji Mikami; Mototsugu Oya
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2014-12-25

5.  Progression after radical prostatectomy for men in their thirties compared to older men.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; David J Hernandez; Leslie A Mangold; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Marilyn Agro; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin; Misop Han
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Risk stratification for biochemical recurrence in men with positive surgical margins or extracapsular disease after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database.

Authors:  Jayakrishnan Jayachandran; Lionel L Bañez; Donna E Levy; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Joseph C Presti; Christopher L Amling; Christopher J Kane; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Correlations between age, Charlson score and outcome in clinical unilateral T3a prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chao-Yu Hsu; Steven Joniau; Raymond Oyen; Tania Roskams; Hein Van Poppel
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  Predictive factors of [(11)C]choline PET/CT in patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Maria Picchio; Elisa Coradeschi; Valentino Bettinardi; Luigi Gianolli; Vincenzo Scattoni; Cesare Cozzarini; Nadia Di Muzio; Patrizio Rigatti; Ferruccio Fazio; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Treatment and survival outcomes in young men diagnosed with prostate cancer: a Population-based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Daniel W Lin; Michael Porter; Bruce Montgomery
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Prostate cancer in men aged less than 50 years at diagnosis.

Authors:  N J Kinnear; G Kichenadasse; S Plagakis; M E O'Callaghan; T Kopsaftis; S Walsh; D Foreman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.