Literature DB >> 18342343

Attentional bias as trait: correlations with novelty seeking.

Rachel Tomer1.   

Abstract

Pseudoneglect is traditionally viewed as reflecting right hemisphere specialization for processing spatial information, which brings about relatively greater activation of the right hemisphere and orienting towards the contralateral space. Such interpretation implies that the leftward attentional bias is a population trait. Animal studies, however, suggest that orienting bias is a trait of the individual and individual differences in the direction and magnitude of this orienting bias reflect individual differences in asymmetry in dopaminergic brain systems, which are also reflected in other behavioral differences. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that healthy individuals show consistent attentional bias, the direction and magnitude of which varies among individuals and is associated with the degree of novelty seeking, a temperament trait associated with dopamine asymmetry. Forty-nine right-handed participants performed the greyscales task on two separate occasions and completed the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire. Although on average some degree of leftward attentional bias was observed on both occasions, both the direction and the magnitude of the bias differed greatly, with some individuals showing a strong leftward bias whereas others showed a strong rightward bias. A highly significant correlation was found between degree and magnitude of this bias on the two testing sessions, supporting the hypothesis that it may reflect an individual trait. As predicted, higher scores on novelty seeking were associated with rightward attentional bias, suggesting that this bias may reflect asymmetries in dopaminergic circuits in healthy individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18342343     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  9 in total

1.  Left-shifting prism adaptation boosts reward-based learning.

Authors:  Selene Schintu; Michael Freedberg; Zaynah M Alam; Sarah Shomstein; Eric M Wassermann
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Novelty seeking and reward dependence-related large-scale brain networks functional connectivity variation during salience expectancy.

Authors:  Shijia Li; Liliana Ramona Demenescu; Catherine M Sweeney-Reed; Anna Linda Krause; Coraline D Metzger; Martin Walter
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Individual variation in resisting temptation: implications for addiction.

Authors:  Benjamin T Saunders; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Asymmetries in attention as revealed by fixations and saccades.

Authors:  Nicole A Thomas; Tobias Loetscher; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Dopamine asymmetries predict orienting bias in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Rachel Tomer; Heleen A Slagter; Bradley T Christian; Andrew S Fox; Carlye R King; Dhanabalan Murali; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Eye-blink rate predicts individual differences in pseudoneglect.

Authors:  Heleen A Slagter; Richard J Davidson; Rachel Tomer
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Preliminary effects of prefrontal tDCS on dopamine-mediated behavior and psychophysiology.

Authors:  Michael J Imburgio; Hannah K Ballard; Astin C Cornwall; Darrell A Worthy; Jessica A Bernard; Joseph M Orr
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect.

Authors:  Gemma Learmonth; Aodhan Gallagher; Jamie Gibson; Gregor Thut; Monika Harvey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Orienting asymmetries and lateralized processing of sounds in humans.

Authors:  Julia Fischer; Christoph Teufel; Matthis Drolet; Annika Patzelt; Rudolf Rübsamen; D Yves von Cramon; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.288

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.