R S Saleh1, D G Lohan, J P Villablanca, G Duckwiler, S T Kee, J P Finn. 1. Division of Diagnostic Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7206, USA. rsaleh@mednet.ucla.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with arteriovenous malformation (AVM) are known to have an elevated risk of complications with conventional catheter angiography (CCA) but nonetheless require monitoring of hemodynamics. Thus, we aimed to evaluate both anatomy and hemodynamics in patients with AVM noninvasively by using contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) at 3T and to compare the results with CCA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained for this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study. Twenty control subjects without vascular malformation (6 men, 18-70 years of age) and 10 patients with AVMs (6 men, 20-74 years of age) underwent supra-aortic time-resolved and high-spatial-resolution CE-MRA at 3T. Large-field-of-view coronal acquisitions extending from the root of the aorta to the cranial vertex were obtained for both MRA techniques. Image quality was assessed by 2 specialized radiologists by using a 4-point scale. AVM characteristics and nidus size were evaluated by using both CE-MRA and CCA in all patients. RESULTS: In patients, 96.6% (319/330) of arterial segments on high-spatial-resolution MRA and 87.7% (272/310) of arterial segments on time-resolved MRA were graded excellent/good. MRA showed 100% specificity for detecting feeding arteries and venous drainage (n = 8) and complete obliteration of the AVM in 2 cases (concordance with CCA). Nidus diameters measured by both MRA and CCA resulted in a very strong correlation (r = 0.99) with a mild overestimation by MRA (0.10 cm by using the Bland-Altman plot). CONCLUSION: By combining highly temporally resolved and highly spatially resolved MRA at 3T as complementary studies, one can assess vascular anatomy and hemodynamics noninvasively in patients with AVM.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Patients with arteriovenous malformation (AVM) are known to have an elevated risk of complications with conventional catheter angiography (CCA) but nonetheless require monitoring of hemodynamics. Thus, we aimed to evaluate both anatomy and hemodynamics in patients with AVM noninvasively by using contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) at 3T and to compare the results with CCA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained for this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study. Twenty control subjects without vascular malformation (6 men, 18-70 years of age) and 10 patients with AVMs (6 men, 20-74 years of age) underwent supra-aortic time-resolved and high-spatial-resolution CE-MRA at 3T. Large-field-of-view coronal acquisitions extending from the root of the aorta to the cranial vertex were obtained for both MRA techniques. Image quality was assessed by 2 specialized radiologists by using a 4-point scale. AVM characteristics and nidus size were evaluated by using both CE-MRA and CCA in all patients. RESULTS: In patients, 96.6% (319/330) of arterial segments on high-spatial-resolution MRA and 87.7% (272/310) of arterial segments on time-resolved MRA were graded excellent/good. MRA showed 100% specificity for detecting feeding arteries and venous drainage (n = 8) and complete obliteration of the AVM in 2 cases (concordance with CCA). Nidus diameters measured by both MRA and CCA resulted in a very strong correlation (r = 0.99) with a mild overestimation by MRA (0.10 cm by using the Bland-Altman plot). CONCLUSION: By combining highly temporally resolved and highly spatially resolved MRA at 3T as complementary studies, one can assess vascular anatomy and hemodynamics noninvasively in patients with AVM.
Authors: James C Carr; Jason Ma; Vibhas Desphande; Scott Pereles; Gerhard Laub; J Paul Finn Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: A Hartmann; H Mast; J P Mohr; H C Koennecke; A Osipov; J Pile-Spellman; D H Duong; W L Young Journal: Stroke Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Ercument Unlu; Osman Temizoz; Sait Albayram; Hakan Genchellac; M Kemal Hamamcioglu; Imran Kurt; M Kemal Demir Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2006-09-11 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Kambiz Nael; Henrik J Michaely; Pablo Villablanca; Noriko Salamon; Gerhard Laub; J Paul Finn Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: D R Buis; J C J Bot; F Barkhof; D L Knol; F J Lagerwaard; B J Slotman; W P Vandertop; R van den Berg Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-11-17 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: H Raoult; J-C Ferré; X Morandi; B Carsin-Nicol; M Carsin; M Cuggia; M Law; J-Y Gauvrit Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-05-06 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: D R Hadizadeh; G M Kukuk; D T Steck; J Gieseke; H Urbach; H J Tschampa; S Greschus; A Kovàcs; M Möhlenbruch; A Bostroem; H H Schild; W A Willinek Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: S Meckel; C Reisinger; J Bremerich; D Damm; M Wolbers; S Engelter; K Scheffler; S G Wetzel Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-11-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Martinus J van Amerongen; Sjoert A H Pegge; Mustapha El Kandoussi; Hieronymus D Boogaarts; Frederick J A Meijer Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 2.804