Literature DB >> 2406993

Cerebral angiographic risk in mild cerebrovascular disease.

G J Hankey1, C P Warlow, R J Sellar.   

Abstract

We review the eight prospective and seven retrospective studies from which it is possible to derive the complication rate of conventional cerebral angiography for patients with mild ischemic cerebrovascular disease who are potential candidates for carotid endarterectomy. Three studies of intravenous and one of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography are also examined. An overview of the results suggests that the risk of a neurological complication (TIA or stroke) is about 4% and that a permanent neurological deficit (disabling stroke) occurs in about 1%. The mortality rate is very low (less than 0.1%). Systemic complications are not infrequent, particularly with intravenous digital subtraction angiography. The complication rate of cerebral angiography must be considered when evaluating the risks of carotid endarterectomy in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2406993     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.21.2.209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  74 in total

1.  Diagnosis of internal carotid artery stenosis greater than 70% with power Doppler duplex sonography.

Authors:  M Koga; K Kimura; K Minematsu; T Yamaguchi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Quality improvement guidelines for adult diagnostic neuroangiography. Cooperative study between the ASNR, ASITN, and the SCVIR. American Society of Neuroradiology. American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology. Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  How does the degree of carotid stenosis affect the accuracy and interobserver variability of magnetic resonance angiography?

Authors:  J M Wardlaw; S C Lewis; P Humphrey; G Young; D Collie; C P Warlow
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 4.  Utility of noninvasive studies in the evaluation of patients with carotid artery disease.

Authors:  Dean C C Johnston; Larry B Goldstein
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.081

5.  Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Juan Alvarez-Linera; Julián Benito-León; José Escribano; Jorge Campollo; Ricardo Gesto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Prevention of ischemic stroke: the role of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  M Del Sette; V C Hachinski
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1992-09

7.  Quantification and assessment of extracranial and intracranial occlusive disease.

Authors:  Muhammad S Hussain; Rishi Gupta
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2008-01

Review 8.  Perioperative stroke. Part I: General surgery, carotid artery disease, and carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  D H Wong
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: quantitative MR assessment of nidal response at 1 year and angiographic factors predicting early obliteration.

Authors:  S Nagaraja; K J Lee; S C Coley; D Capener; L Walton; A A Kemeny; I D Wilkinson; P D Griffiths
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Measuring carotid artery stenosis--comparison of postmortem arteriograms with the planimetric gold standard.

Authors:  Gernot Schulte-Altedorneburg; Dirk W Droste; Józef Kollár; Torsten Beyna; Szabolcs Felszeghy; László Módis; Csaba Hegedüs; E Bernd Ringelstein; László Csiba
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.