Literature DB >> 18338919

Comparative evaluation of ATB Fungus 2 and Sensititre YeastOne panels for testing in vitro Candida antifungal susceptibility.

Elena Eraso1, Maite Ruesga, María Villar-Vidal, Alfonso Javier Carrillo-Muñoz, Ana Espinel-Ingroff, Guillermo Quindós.   

Abstract

ATB Fungus 2 and SensititreYeastOne are commercial methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. The agreement between these two methods was assessed with a total of 133 Candida strains (60 Candida albicans, 18 Candida dubliniensis, 29 Candida glabrata, and 26 Candida krusei). MIC endpoints were established after 24 h of incubation at 36-/+1 degrees C by each method. Intra-laboratory reproducibility of both methods was excellent (=or>99%). Overall agreement between ATB Fungus 2 and Sensititre YeastOne 3 MICs (within 2 dilutions) was 91.2-97.7% for amphotericin B, 5-fluorocytosine and itraconazole, and 82.7% for fluconazole. The categorical agreement when ATB Fungus 2 results were compared to those by SensititreYeastOne 3 was 93.2-98.5% for 5-fluorocytosine and amphotericin B, but lower for the triazoles (72.9-75.9%). This easy to perform method could be an alternative for routine use in the clinical microbiology laboratory for susceptibility testing of common Candida spp.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18338919     DOI: 10.1016/s1130-1406(08)70002-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Iberoam Micol        ISSN: 1130-1406            Impact factor:   1.044


  7 in total

1.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae vaginitis: microbiology and in vitro antifungal susceptibility.

Authors:  María Julia Echeverría-Irigoyen; Elena Eraso; Josep Cano; María Gomáriz; Josep Guarro; Guillermo Quindós
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 2.574

2.  Susceptibility of clinical Candida species isolates to antifungal agents by E-test, Southern Iran: A five year study.

Authors:  P Badiee; A Alborzi
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2011-12

3.  The widely used ATB FUNGUS 3 automated readings in China and its misleading high MICs of Candida spp. to azoles: challenges for developing countries' clinical microbiology labs.

Authors:  Li Zhang; He Wang; Meng Xiao; Timothy Kudinha; Lei-Li Mao; Hao-Ran Zhao; Fanrong Kong; Ying-Chun Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Oral candidiasis among African human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals: 10 years of systematic review and meta-analysis from sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Martha F Mushi; Oliver Bader; Liliane Taverne-Ghadwal; Christine Bii; Uwe Groß; Stephen E Mshana
Journal:  J Oral Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 5.474

5.  K21 Compound, a Potent Antifungal Agent: Implications for the Treatment of Fluconazole-Resistant HIV-Associated Candida Species.

Authors:  Cathy N John; Pedro M D S Abrantes; Bhupesh K Prusty; Dharam V Ablashi; Charlene W J Africa
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Comparison of the Sensititre YeastOne antifungal method with the CLSI M27-A3 reference method to determine the activity of antifungal agents against clinical isolates of Candidaspp.

Authors:  Rabiye Altinbaş; Ayşe Barış; Sümeyye Şen; Recep Öztürk; Nuri Kiraz
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 0.973

Review 7.  Commercial Methods for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts: Strengths and Limitations as Predictors of Resistance.

Authors:  Ana Espinel-Ingroff
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.