Literature DB >> 22530086

Susceptibility of clinical Candida species isolates to antifungal agents by E-test, Southern Iran: A five year study.

P Badiee1, A Alborzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The incidence of fungal infections in immunocompromised patients, especially by Candida species, has increased in recent years. This study was designed to identify Candida species and determine antifungal susceptibility patterns of 595 yeast strains isolated from various clinical specimens.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Identification of the isolates were determined by the API 20 C AUX kit and antifungal susceptibilities of the species to fluconazole, amphotericin B, ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and caspofungin were determined by the agar-based E-test method.
RESULTS: Candida albicans (48%) was the most frequently isolated species, followed by Candida kruzei (16.1%), Candida glabrata (13.5%), Candida kefyr (7.4%), Candida parapsilosis (4.8%), Candida tropicalis (1.7%) and other species (8.5%). Resistance varies depending on the species and the respective antifungal agents. Comparing the MIC90 for all the strains, the lower MIC90 was observed for caspofungin (0.5 µg/ml). The MIC90 for all Candida species were 64 µg/ml for fluconazole, 0.75 µg/ml for amphotericin B, 4 µg/ml for ketoconazole, 4 µg/ml for itraconazole, and 2 µg/ml for voriconazole.
CONCLUSIONS: Species definition and determination of antifungal susceptibility patterns are advised for the proper management and treatment of patients at risk for systemic candidiasis. Resistance to antifungal agents is an alarming sign for the emerging common nosocomial fungal infections.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Candida; E-test; amphotericin B; antifungal susceptibility; itraconazole; voriconazole

Year:  2011        PMID: 22530086      PMCID: PMC3330181     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Microbiol        ISSN: 2008-3289


INTRODUCTION

Systemic candidiasis (SC) is the most common invasive fungal infection as the nosocomial infection in patients undergoing major surgeries during prolonged neutropenia, transplantation and extended hospital stays of days to weeks, (1). This infection is potentially a life-threatening complication in immunocompromised patients. The introduction of novel antineoplastic agents, antifungals, antibacterial and antivirals over the past 10 years has led to a shift in fungal epidemiology (2, 3) and fever without specific signs and symptoms of localized fungal infection is the most common clinical presentation. Intensive and long-term use of antifungals leads to a decline in sensitivity and resistance development of Candida strains (4). Antifungal resistance surveillance serves as a major strategy for prophylaxis, empirical therapy, and treatment of SC. For the management of patients suffering from SC, determination of the changes in the distribution of Candida species and respective sensitivity pattern to antifungal agents are important. Antifungal prophylaxis is warranted in patients with developing risk of SC. As definitive early diagnosis is difficult, empiric therapy of antifungal agents has become a standard of practice in immune-suppressed patients like neutropenic patients who had received broad spectrum antibacterial therapy but remain persistently febrile. The antifungal susceptibility testing of pathogenic fungi can manage the selection of adequate therapy and also provide an estimate of antifungal efficacy. Monitoring of drug resistance development can predict therapeutic outcome and therapeutic potential of untested compounds (5–7). The purpose of this study was to determine the distribution of Candida species and in vitro susceptibilities of antifungal agents against the Candida isolated from the patients referred to a mycology center in southern Iran using E-test for the best management and treatment of those at risk for SC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was designed in mycology department, Clinical Microbiology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, southern Iran from October 2005 to October 2010. Clinical samples including mouth, blood, abdominal tap, urine, sputum, esophageal, oropharyngeal, vagina, biopsy and broncho alveolar lavage of patients were cultured on saboaroud dextrose agar (Merck, Germany) and incubated at 24°C for 10 days. All Candida spp. isolated were cultured on potato dextrose agar (OXOID LTD, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England) twice for 48h at 35°C for the purity inspected. For species typing of the isolates, germ tube and chlamydospore production tests were performed. The carbohydrate assimilation patterns of all the isolates were studied using the API 20 C AUX system according to the manufacturer's procedure (Biomerieux, France). Candida (C) dubliniensis sp. was recognized by molecular assay from Candida albicans (8) because these species have the same pattern for carbohydrate assimilation. Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and Candida krusei ATCC 6258 (9) were quality controls and tested each day for all antifungal agents. Susceptibility test for the isolates was performed by the agar-based E-test method (Biomeriux, Sweden) with RPMI 1640, 8.4 gram per litter (RPMI; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.), 2% glucose and1.5% agar which buffered to PH 7.0 with 0.165 M morpholinepropanesulfonic acid buffer (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), poured in 90-mm-diameter plates. The plates were inoculated by dipping a sterile swab into the inoculum suspension adjusted to the turbidity of a 0.5 McFarland standard (106 cells/ml) and streaking it across the surface of the agar in four directions. The plates were dried at ambient temperature for 15 minutes before applying the E-test strips. The minimum inhibition concentrations (MIC) endpoints were determined after 24 and 48 h of incubation at 35°C. The MIC was read for amphotericin B, as the drug concentration that zone determined the point of complete inhibition (100%), and for ketoconazole; itraconazole, voriconazole and caspofungin the significant inhibition decreased 80% of the growth. The resistance breakpoints for antifungals are amphotericin B > 1.0; fluconazole ≥ 64; itraconazole ≥ 1.0; voriconazole ≥ 8.0; ketoconazole ≥ 4.0; and caspofungin ≥ 2.0 micrograms per milliliter (10–15). MIC50 and MIC90 (the MIC at which 50% and 90% of the isolates are inhibited) were also calculated. Data were entered into SPSS version 16 and were subsequently analyzed using descriptive statistics and cross tabulation.

RESULTS

Totally, 595 Candida spp. were isolated from the patients. The most sites of the isolated (70%) were mouth and lung (sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage), but Candida species were also isolated from the blood, cerebro spinal fluid, sinus biopsy, eyes, pleural and abdominal tap. The most species isolated from the patients was C. albicans followed by C. krusei, C. glabrata, C. kefyr, and C. parapsilosis (Table 1).
Table 1

Distributions of Candida species isolates from patients 2005-2009.

SpeciesNo. of isolates% of isolates
Candida albicans28548%
Candida krusei9616.1%
Candida glabrata8013.5%
Candida kefyr447.4%
Candida parapsilosis294.8%
Candida tropicalis101.7%
Others*518.5%
Total595100

Others include C. dublinensis 9, C.apicola 8, C. famata 4, C. zeylanoides 6, Cryptococcus neoformans 9, Trichosporon beigelii. 8, Saccharomyces cervicea 7.

Distributions of Candida species isolates from patients 2005-2009. Others include C. dublinensis 9, C.apicola 8, C. famata 4, C. zeylanoides 6, Cryptococcus neoformans 9, Trichosporon beigelii. 8, Saccharomyces cervicea 7. Candida albicans, the most species isolated, was sensitive to caspofungin, voriconazole, amphotericine B, ketoconazole, and fluconazole with 98.2%, 94%, 93%, 90.6%, and 89.5%, respectively. Of the 96 C. krusei strains, 32 (33.4%) were sensitive to fluconazole, 93 (96.9%) to amphotericine B, 86 (89.6%) to ketoconazole, 77 (80.2%) to voriconazole and 92 (95.8%) to caspofungin. Among the 80 C. glabrata, the third isolated species, 32 (40%) were found to be sensitive to fluconazole, 78 (97.5%) to amphotericine B, 68 (85%) to ketoconazole, 72 (90%) to voriconazole and 77 (96.3%) to caspofungin. Candida kefyr species had the least sensitivity to fluconazole 24 (54.5%), and high sensitivity (> 85%) to the other antifungals. Candida Parapsilopsis species showed high sensitivity rate to all antifungal agents. The lowest sensitivity was seen to itraconazole, C. albicans 189 (66.3%), C. glabrata 12 (15%), and C. krusei 13 (13.5%). Table 2 presents the antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida isolates to antifungal agents by E-test.
Table 2

Distributions of MIC (µg/ml) by E-test method.

Species (no. isolates)Antifungal agentRange50%90%Number of Resistance (%)
C.albicans (285)Fluconazole1.00-64.04.00016.0030.(10.5%)
Amphotericin0.032-1.000.0320.50020 (7%)
Ketoconazole0.002-16.000.0644.0027 (9.4%)
Itraconazole0.016-4.000.1902.0096 (33.7%)
Voriconazole0.025- 0.003-16.000.0644.0017 (6%)
Caspofungin1.000.0250.0755 (1.8%)
C. krusei (96)Fluconazole4.00-64.008.00128.0064 (66.6%)
Amphotericin0.064-1.000.1250.2503 (3.1%)
Ketoconazole0.380-32.001.5004.0010 (10.4%)
Itraconazole0.500-16.000.5.004.0083 (86.5%)
Voriconazole0.100-32.000.5002.0019 (19.8%)
Caspofungin0.015-0.50.240.5004 (4.2%)
C. glabrata (80)Fluconazole0.75-25664.00128.048 (60%)
Amphotericin0.013-10.1900.5002 (2.5%)
Ketoconazole0.013-121.5006.0012 (15%)
Itraconazole0.500-16.02.0016.0068 (85%)
Voriconazole0.012-8.000.7503.008 (10%)
Caspofungin0.03-4.000.060.123 (3.7%)
C. Kefyr (44)Fluconazole0.038-128.01.008.00020 (45.5%)
Amphotericin0.016-1.000.1900.7502 (4.5%)
Ketoconazole0.012-0.1900.0320.0471 (2.3%)
Itraconazole0.002-1.000.0470.5005 (11.4%)
Voriconazole0.008-16.000.0230.0641 (2.3%)
Caspofungin0.03-10.0640.1251 (2.3%)
C. parapsilosis(29)Fluconazole2.00-64.001.004.002 (6.9%)
Amphotericin0.023-0.5000.2500.5001 (3.5%)
Ketoconazole0.016-0.0640.0230.0471 (3.5%)
Itraconazole0.023-0.5000.1250.2501 (3.5%)
Voriconazole0.006-0.0470.0160.0320.00
Caspofungin0.03-20.251.000.00

Resistance is defined as the following MIC in micrograms per milliliter: Flu ≥ 64; AMB > 1.0; Keto ≥ 4.0; Itra ≥ 1.0; Vori ≥ 4.0; and Caspofungin ≥ 2.0.

Distributions of MIC (µg/ml) by E-test method. Resistance is defined as the following MIC in micrograms per milliliter: Flu ≥ 64; AMB > 1.0; Keto ≥ 4.0; Itra ≥ 1.0; Vori ≥ 4.0; and Caspofungin ≥ 2.0. Comparing the MIC90 of species, the lowest MIC90 was observed for caspofungin (0.5 µg/ml). The MIC90 for all Candida species were 64 µg/ml for fluconazole, 0.75 µg/ml for amphotericin B, 4 µg/ ml for ketoconazole, 4 µg/ml for itraconazole, and 2 µg/ml for voriconazole.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, the agar-based E-test was used and performed well for the testing of antifungal agents as there are reports about the usefulness of this method and agreement between the E-test and the broth micro-dilution MIC for Candida species and different types of antifungal agents (16, 17). In this study, we isolated 595 strains from various clinical samples with higher rate of C. albicans (48%), followed by C. glabrata (13.5%) and C. Parapsilosis (4.8%) (Table 1). The distributions of the species are different in various regions and studies, like 50% C. albicans, 24.7% C. glabrata, and 1% C. parapsilosis in other studies (18, 19). These observations establish the great importance of non -albicans Candida as a pathogen in clinical samples. It is important that increase in non-albicans species in SC with intensive and long-term use of antifungals leads to higher level of resistance of Candida strains to the antifungal drugs (20–22). A remarkable point in our study is that the most commonly isolated species was C. albicans in the clinical samples followed by C. krusei and C. glabrata which can pose a serious threat due to resistance to the routine antifungal agents. Amphotericin B deoxycholate was the first systemic antifungal agent for the treatment of invasive fungal infections and has been the drug of choice (23, 24), however, due to nephrotoxicity in up to 80% of the patients, use of amphotericin B has been limited (25). Specific breakpoint for amphotericin B has not been proposed because it can positively affect the immune system and stimulates the body defenses against fungal infections (26, 27); therefore, the correlation between in vitro susceptibility pattern and in vivo responses in patients is not predictable. Resistance to amphotericin B as a routine antifungal agent and valid in our hospital for SC, varies in different studies. All Candida isolates in Tseng et al. 2005, were susceptible to amphotericin (17) but in our study 7% of C. albicans with MIC90, 0.500 µg/ml, 3.1% of C. krusei (MIC90 0.250 µg/ml), and 2.5% of C. glabrata (MIC90 0.500 µg/ml) were resistant to it. Development of the triazoles in the 1990s provided alternative options for treating SC. Long-term fluconazole and itraconazole prophylaxis was associated with reduction in susceptibility to these agents. Susceptibility of C. albicans to fluconazole in this study was 89.5% (at MIC ≤ 16 µg/mL), comparable with the susceptibility rates reported in other studies (80.9%, 87%, 79% and 87.5%) (17, 28–30). The resistant rate of C. albicans to itraconazole in this study was 33.7%, and MIC90% for it was presented ≤ 6 µg/ml. Different rates of resistance to fluconazole and itraconazole were detected in Candida strains especially non albicans strain (14, 18). From the standpoint of antifungal resistance, C. glabrata and C. krusei are clearly the Candida species with the greatest potential to acquire resistance to fluconazole and other azoles (14, 15). Of the 96 C. krusei strains, 83 (86.3%) were resistant to itraconazole, 64 (66.6%) to fluconazole, 19 (19.8%) to voriconazole, 4 (4.2%) to caspofungin, and 3 (3.1%) to amphotericine B. Also, the MIC of C. glabrata was higher than that for all other species of Candida to triazoles agents (Table 2). Blood stream infection due to C. kefyr is uncommon, but there has been some reports in immunocompromised patients (31) and resistance to antifungals in the literature (4, 20). In the present study, 7.4% of Candida isolates were C. kefyr, of which 45.5% were resistant to fluconazole but sensitive to the other antifungals. There were many species which resisted two or three azole antifungal agents and with higher MIC for other azole antifungal agents. This shows that the resistance to one azole can lead to resistance to other azoles, as reported in other studies (14, 15) and thus, is a caution for use of this agent in clinical practice. Caspofungin is the first echinocandin, approved in 2002 with the mechanism of inhibiting the 1, 3-β d-glucan as an integral part of the fungal cell wall. In the present study, caspofungin was the most active compound inhibiting 90% of C. albicans isolates at 0.075 µg/ml, C. krusei in 0.5 µg/ml, C. glabrata in 0.12 µg/ml; C. Kefyr in 0.125 µg/ml; and C. parapsilosis in 1.0 µg/ml. Some species such as C. parapsilosis and C. guilliermondii have a relatively higher echinocandin MIC (32). There are many view points on the use of new antifungal agents. Such agents are very effective but in many countries, especially in the developing ones, they are very expensive or not available to the respective patients. Therefore, we need to know the antifungal susceptibility rates in each region for the available agents in order to better manage the patients. The successful treatment of SC depends on the early identification of the species and sensitivity patterns to antifungal agents. The high growing rate of non albicans Candida resistant to azole confirms the importance of monitoring changes in the distribution of pathogenic Candida species. The sensitivity pattern of Candida species as revealed in this study shows that amphotericin B, voriconazole, and caspofungin with the lowest MIC seem to be suitable drugs for empirical therapy and fluconazole and itraconazole are not suitable because of their high MIC and Candida species resistance to them.
  27 in total

Review 1.  Antifungal susceptibility testing. New technology and clinical applications.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; W L Yu
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.982

2.  2002 guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer.

Authors:  Walter T Hughes; Donald Armstrong; Gerald P Bodey; Eric J Bow; Arthur E Brown; Thierry Calandra; Ronald Feld; Philip A Pizzo; Kenneth V I Rolston; Jerry L Shenep; Lowell S Young
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-02-13       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Evaluation of the Etest and disk diffusion methods for determining susceptibilities of 235 bloodstream isolates of Candida glabrata to fluconazole and voriconazole.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D J Diekema; L Boyken; S A Messer; S Tendolkar; R J Hollis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Candida kefyr as an emerging pathogen causing nosocomial bloodstream infections in neutropenic leukemia patients.

Authors:  Christoph W M Reuter; Michael A Morgan; Franz-Christoph Bange; Florian Gunzer; Matthias Eder; Bernd Hertenstein; Arnold Ganser
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  In vitro susceptibility of Candida species isolated from blood culture to some antifungal agents.

Authors:  Sumru Citak; Berrin Ozçelik; Salih Cesur; Ufuk Abbasoğlu
Journal:  Jpn J Infect Dis       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.362

6.  Release of prostaglandin E-2 in bovine brain endothelial cells after exposure to three unique forms of the antifungal drug amphotericin-B: role of COX-2 in amphotericin-B induced fever.

Authors:  Timothy R McGuire; William J Trickler; Lynette Hock; Amy Vrana; Eric B Hoie; Donald W Miller
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 5.037

7.  Rapid identification of Candida albicans and other human pathogenic yeasts by using short oligonucleotides in a PCR.

Authors:  B M Mannarelli; C P Kurtzman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  A systematic review of the antifungal effectiveness and tolerability of amphotericin B formulations.

Authors:  Jane P Barrett; Katerina A Vardulaki; Christopher Conlon; Jonathan Cooke; Pascual Daza-Ramirez; E Glyn V Evans; Peter M Hawkey; Raoul Herbrecht; David I Marks; Jose M Moraleda; Gilbert R Park; Stephen J Senn; Claudio Viscoli
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 9.  The echinocandins: three useful choices or three too many?

Authors:  A M Bal
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 5.283

10.  Amphotericin B: time for a new "gold standard".

Authors:  Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Kieren A Marr; John H Rex; Stuart H Cohen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  20 in total

1.  Caspofungin MIC Distribution amongst Commonly Isolated Candida Species in a Tertiary Care Centre - An Indian Experience.

Authors:  Shashir Wanjare; Rajarshi Gupta; Preeti Mehta
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

Review 2.  Challenges in the Polyene- and Azole-Based Pharmacotherapy of Ocular Fungal Infections.

Authors:  Prit Lakhani; Akash Patil; Soumyajit Majumdar
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.671

Review 3.  Candiduria; a review article with specific data from Iran.

Authors:  Maral Gharaghani; Simin Taghipour; Marzieh Halvaeezadeh; Ali Zarei Mahmoudabadi
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-11

4.  Prevalence of Candida co-infection in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis.

Authors:  Arunava Kali; Mv Pravin Charles; Mariya Joseph Noyal; Umadevi Sivaraman; Shailesh Kumar; Joshy M Easow
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2013-08-31

5.  Impact of antifungal stewardship interventions on the susceptibility of colonized Candida species in pediatric patients with malignancy.

Authors:  Ali Amanati; Parisa Badiee; Hadis Jafarian; Fatemeh Ghasemi; Samane Nematolahi; Sezaneh Haghpanah; Seyedeh Sedigheh Hamzavi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Heparin-benzyl alcohol enhancement of biofilms formation and antifungal susceptibility of vaginal Candida species isolated from pregnant and nonpregnant Saudi women.

Authors:  Raid A Al-Akeel; Talat A El-Kersh; Yazeed A Al-Sheikh; Ziab Zakey Al-Ahmadey
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2013-04-13

7.  Lamisil versus clotrimazole in the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis.

Authors:  Ali Zarei Mahmoudabadi; Mahin Najafyan; Eskandar Moghimipour; Maryam Alwanian; Zahra Seifi
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2013-03

8.  In Vitro Susceptibilities of Candida albicans Isolates to Antifungal Agents in Tokat, Turkey.

Authors:  Gulgun Yenisehirli; Nermin Bulut; Aydan Yenisehirli; Yunus Bulut
Journal:  Jundishapur J Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 0.747

Review 9.  Evaluation of human body fluids for the diagnosis of fungal infections.

Authors:  Parisa Badiee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Yeast colonization and drug susceptibility pattern in the pediatric patients with neutropenia.

Authors:  Pedram Haddadi; Soheila Zareifar; Parisa Badiee; Abdolvahab Alborzi; Maral Mokhtari; Kamiar Zomorodian; Keyvan Pakshir; Hadis Jafarian
Journal:  Jundishapur J Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 0.747

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.