PURPOSE: Focal metastasis may be treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), a low invasive method yet limited by the lack of direct evidence of radicality of treatment. We, hereby, aimed at assessing the role of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) with fluoride radiolabeled deoxy-glucose ([(18)F]FDG) in RFA treatment success evaluation and early diagnosis of local relapse of liver metastasis after RFA procedure. METHODS: RFA was performed in nine patients on 12 liver metastasis, serially imaged through [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT and multidetector CT (MDCT) at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after treatment. Eight lesions were also scanned with [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT at 1 week after treatment. Imaging analyses were performed on 47 [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT and 51 MDCT. Imaging reading outcomes were compared to each other and to biopsy tissue results when available. RESULTS: In one case, [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT revealed radiotracer uptake at RFA site a week after procedure. Negative concordant outcome was obtained on eight lesions at 1 month after RFA, on eight cases at 3 months, on four at 6 months, and on two cases at 9 months. Extra-liver (peritoneal) disease was detected in one case by both [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT and MDCT. In seven cases, [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT revealed the presence of local recurrence earlier than MDCT. In no cases did MDCT detect local relapse earlier than [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT. CONCLUSION: [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT may detect RFA treatment failure as well as local relapse after RFA earlier than MDCT.
PURPOSE: Focal metastasis may be treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), a low invasive method yet limited by the lack of direct evidence of radicality of treatment. We, hereby, aimed at assessing the role of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) with fluoride radiolabeled deoxy-glucose ([(18)F]FDG) in RFA treatment success evaluation and early diagnosis of local relapse of liver metastasis after RFA procedure. METHODS: RFA was performed in nine patients on 12 liver metastasis, serially imaged through [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT and multidetector CT (MDCT) at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after treatment. Eight lesions were also scanned with [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT at 1 week after treatment. Imaging analyses were performed on 47 [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT and 51 MDCT. Imaging reading outcomes were compared to each other and to biopsy tissue results when available. RESULTS: In one case, [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT revealed radiotracer uptake at RFA site a week after procedure. Negative concordant outcome was obtained on eight lesions at 1 month after RFA, on eight cases at 3 months, on four at 6 months, and on two cases at 9 months. Extra-liver (peritoneal) disease was detected in one case by both [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT and MDCT. In seven cases, [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT revealed the presence of local recurrence earlier than MDCT. In no cases did MDCT detect local relapse earlier than [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT. CONCLUSION: [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT may detect RFA treatment failure as well as local relapse after RFA earlier than MDCT.
Authors: Gerald Antoch; Florian M Vogt; Patrick Veit; Lutz S Freudenberg; Nina Blechschmid; Olaf Dirsch; Andreas Bockisch; Michael Forsting; Jörg F Debatin; Hilmar Kuehl Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Michael A Choti; James V Sitzmann; Marcelo F Tiburi; Wuthi Sumetchotimetha; Ram Rangsin; Richard D Schulick; Keith D Lillemoe; Charles J Yeo; John L Cameron Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: T J M Ruers; B S Langenhoff; N Neeleman; G J Jager; S Strijk; Th Wobbes; F H M Corstens; W J G Oyen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-01-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M J Duffy; A van Dalen; C Haglund; L Hansson; E Holinski-Feder; R Klapdor; R Lamerz; P Peltomaki; C Sturgeon; O Topolcan Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2007-05-18 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Désirée Deandreis; Sophie Leboulleux; Caroline Caramella; Martin Schlumberger; Eric Baudin Journal: Horm Cancer Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 3.869
Authors: F M Gómez; J Palussière; E Santos; T Tourdias; F Cornélis; V Sáiz; H Montes; O Eker Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 3.405