James Mensch1, Murray Mitchell. 1. University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA. Jmensch@gwm.sc.edu
Abstract
CONTEXT: The success of any academic program, including athletic training, depends upon attracting and keeping quality students. Therefore, understanding potential recruits' perceptions of athletic training is important. OBJECTIVE: To (1) gain insight regarding undergraduate students' decisions to enter or not enter an athletic training education program (ATEP), and (2) examine potential athletic training recruits' perceptions of the roles and responsibilities of certified athletic trainers. DESIGN: We used a descriptive study employing a grounded theory approach to explore perceptions of the athletic training profession by college students with various levels of interest in athletic training. SETTING: Athletic training education program from a National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I research-intensive university. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Forty-six undergraduate students (23 interested in applying to an ATEP and 23 who were aware of but not interested in applying to an ATEP). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Data from in-depth, semi-structured interviews were transcribed and analyzed using open, axial, and selective coding procedures. Member checks and peer-debriefing techniques were used to ensure trustworthiness of the study. RESULTS: Three contributing factors appeared to influence the recruitment of students to a career in athletic training: (1) a strong affiliation to a sports/team model, (2) initial exposure at the high school level, and (3) an incomplete understanding of athletic training. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of how students are recruited into ATEPs is important information for our profession. Educators and administrators must create a comprehensive recruitment strategy using factors that influence potential recruits' decisions to enter the athletic training profession, specifically their association with sports and their experiences during high school.
CONTEXT: The success of any academic program, including athletic training, depends upon attracting and keeping quality students. Therefore, understanding potential recruits' perceptions of athletic training is important. OBJECTIVE: To (1) gain insight regarding undergraduate students' decisions to enter or not enter an athletic training education program (ATEP), and (2) examine potential athletic training recruits' perceptions of the roles and responsibilities of certified athletic trainers. DESIGN: We used a descriptive study employing a grounded theory approach to explore perceptions of the athletic training profession by college students with various levels of interest in athletic training. SETTING: Athletic training education program from a National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I research-intensive university. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Forty-six undergraduate students (23 interested in applying to an ATEP and 23 who were aware of but not interested in applying to an ATEP). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Data from in-depth, semi-structured interviews were transcribed and analyzed using open, axial, and selective coding procedures. Member checks and peer-debriefing techniques were used to ensure trustworthiness of the study. RESULTS: Three contributing factors appeared to influence the recruitment of students to a career in athletic training: (1) a strong affiliation to a sports/team model, (2) initial exposure at the high school level, and (3) an incomplete understanding of athletic training. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of how students are recruited into ATEPs is important information for our profession. Educators and administrators must create a comprehensive recruitment strategy using factors that influence potential recruits' decisions to enter the athletic training profession, specifically their association with sports and their experiences during high school.
Entities:
Keywords:
career choice; recruitment; socialization; subjective warrant
Authors: Linda C Hughes; Patricia Romick; M Kay Sandor; Carolyn A Phillips; Judy Glaister; Karla Levy; Julie Rock Journal: J Prof Nurs Date: 2003 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Thomas G Bowman; Jay Hertel; Stephanie M Mazerolle; Thomas M Dodge; Heather D Wathington Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Allison Young; Joanne Klossner; Carrie L Docherty; Thomas M Dodge; James M Mensch Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2013 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Thomas G Bowman; Stephanie M Mazerolle; William A Pitney; Thomas M Dodge; Jay Hertel Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2015-08-26 Impact factor: 2.860