Literature DB >> 26308497

Student-Retention and Career-Placement Rates Between Bachelor's and Master's Degree Professional Athletic Training Programs.

Thomas G Bowman1, Stephanie M Mazerolle2, William A Pitney3, Thomas M Dodge4, Jay Hertel5.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The debate over what the entry-level degree should be for athletic training has heightened. A comparison of retention and career-placement rates between bachelor's and master's degree professional athletic training programs may inform the debate.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the retention rates and career-placement rates of students in bachelor's and master's degree professional programs.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Web-based survey. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 192 program directors (PDs) from bachelor's degree (n = 177) and master's degree (n = 15) professional programs. INTERVENTION(S): The PDs completed a Web-based survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We instructed the PDs to provide a retention rate and career-placement rate for the students in the programs they lead for each of the past 5 years. We also asked the PDs if they thought retention of students was a problem currently facing athletic training education. We used independent t tests to compare the responses between bachelor's and master's degree professional programs.
RESULTS: We found a higher retention rate for professional master's degree students (88.70% ± 9.02%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 83.71, 93.69) than bachelor's degree students (80.98% ± 17.86%, 95% CI = 78.30, 83.66) (t25 = -2.86, P = .008, d = 0.55). Similarly, PDs from professional master's degree programs reported higher career-placement percentages (88.50% ± 10.68%, 95% CI = 82.33, 94.67) than bachelor's degree professional PDs (71.32% ± 18.47%, 95% CI = 68.54, 74.10) (t20 = -5.40, P < .001, d = 1.14). Finally, we observed no difference between groups regarding whether retention is a problem facing athletic training (χ(2)1 = 0.720, P = .40, Φ = .061).
CONCLUSIONS: Professional master's degree education appears to facilitate higher retention rates and greater career-placement rates in athletic training than bachelor's degree education. Professional socialization, program selectivity, and student commitment and motivation levels may help to explain the differences noted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attrition; persistence; professional education

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26308497      PMCID: PMC4639886          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-50.7.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  8 in total

1.  Pre-registration diploma students: a quantitative study of entry characteristics and course outcomes.

Authors:  J Kevern; C Ricketts; C Webb
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  Survey Research in Athletic Training: The Scientific Method of Development and Implementation.

Authors:  Paula Sammarone Turocy
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  The history and evolution of athletic training education in the United States.

Authors:  G D Delforge; R S Behnke
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  An impossible dream? images of nursing held by pre-registration students and their effect on sustaining motivation to become nurses.

Authors:  J Spouse
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  Student retention in athletic training education programs.

Authors:  Thomas M Dodge; Murray F Mitchell; James M Mensch
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Frustrations among graduates of athletic training education programs.

Authors:  Thomas G Bowman; Thomas M Dodge
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Choosing a career in athletic training: exploring the perceptions of potential recruits.

Authors:  James Mensch; Murray Mitchell
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Undergraduate athletic training students' influences on career decisions after graduation.

Authors:  Stephanie M Mazerolle; Kerri E Gavin; William A Pitney; Douglas J Casa; Laura Burton
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Multistakeholder Perspectives on the Transition to a Graduate-Level Athletic Training Educational Model.

Authors:  Stephanie M Mazerolle; Thomas G Bowman; William A Pitney
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.860

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.