Literature DB >> 18333985

Atypical neural functions underlying phonological processing and silent rehearsal in children who stutter.

Christine Weber-Fox1, John E Spruill, Rebecca Spencer, Anne Smith.   

Abstract

Phonological processing was examined in school-age children who stutter (CWS) by assessing their performance and recording event-related brain potentials (ERPs) in a visual rhyming task. CWS had lower accuracy on rhyming judgments, but the cognitive processes that mediate the comparisons of the phonological representations of words, as indexed by the rhyming effect (RE) ERP, were similar for the stuttering and normally fluent groups. Thus the lower behavioral accuracy of rhyming judgments by the CWS could not be attributed to that particular stage of processing. Instead, the neural functions for processes preceding the RE, indexed by the N400 and CNV elicited by the primes and the N400 elicited by the targets, suggest atypical processing that may have resulted in less efficient, less accurate rhyming judgment for the CWS. Based on the present results, it seems likely that the neural processes related to phonological rehearsal and target word anticipation, as indexed by the CNV, are distinctive for CWS at this age. Further, it is likely that the relative contributions of the left and right hemispheres differ in CWS in the stage of processing when linguistic integration occurs, as indexed by the N400. Taken together, these results suggest that CWS may be less able to form and retain a stable neural representation of the prime onset and rime as they anticipate the target presentation, which may lead to lower rhyming judgment accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18333985      PMCID: PMC2673811          DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00678.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  36 in total

1.  Is overt stuttered speech a prerequisite for the neural activations associated with chronic developmental stuttering?

Authors:  R J Ingham; P T Fox; J Costello Ingham; F Zamarripa
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Phonological processing in visual rhyming: a developmental erp study.

Authors:  G Grossi; D Coch; S Coffey-Corina; P J Holcomb; H J Neville
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Neural systems for sentence processing in stuttering.

Authors:  C Weber-Fox
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Evidence for compensation for stuttering by the right frontal operculum.

Authors:  Christine Preibisch; Katrin Neumann; Peter Raab; Harald A Euler; Alexander W von Gudenberg; Heinrich Lanfermann; Anne-Lise Giraud
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Atypical syntactic processing in individuals who stutter: evidence from event-related brain potentials and behavioral measures.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Cuadrado; Christine M Weber-Fox
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Development of neural processes mediating rhyme judgments: Phonological and orthographic interactions.

Authors:  Christine Weber-Fox; Rebecca Spencer; Elizabeth Cuadrado; Anne Smith
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.038

7.  Variations in the relative speeds of orofacial structures with stuttering severity.

Authors:  M D McClean; C M Runyan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Influences of length and syntactic complexity on the speech motor stability of the fluent speech of adults who stutter.

Authors:  J Kleinow; A Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Potential interactions among linguistic, autonomic, and motor factors in speech.

Authors:  Jennifer Kleinow; Anne Smith
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.038

10.  Disconnection of speech-relevant brain areas in persistent developmental stuttering.

Authors:  Martin Sommer; Martin A Koch; Walter Paulus; Cornelius Weiller; Christian Büchel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-08-03       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  37 in total

1.  Emotional reactivity, regulation and childhood stuttering: a behavioral and electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Hayley S Arnold; Edward G Conture; Alexandra P F Key; Tedra Walden
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Non-linguistic auditory processing and working memory update in pre-school children who stutter: an electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Natalya Kaganovich; Amanda Hampton Wray; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  Speech-induced suppression of evoked auditory fields in children who stutter.

Authors:  Deryk S Beal; Maher A Quraan; Douglas O Cheyne; Margot J Taylor; Vincent L Gracco; Luc F De Nil
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  A preliminary investigation of segmentation and rhyme abilities of children who stutter.

Authors:  Jayanthi Sasisekaran; Courtney T Byrd
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 2.538

5.  Neural Processes Underlying Nonword Rhyme Differentiate Eventual Stuttering Persistence and Recovery.

Authors:  Amanda Hampton Wray; Gregory Spray
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Short-Term Memory, Inhibition, and Attention in Developmental Stuttering: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Levi C Ofoe; Julie D Anderson; Katerina Ntourou
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Emotional reactivity and regulation associated with fluent and stuttered utterances of preschool-age children who stutter.

Authors:  Robin M Jones; Edward G Conture; Tedra A Walden
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 2.288

8.  Dissociations among linguistic, cognitive, and auditory-motor neuroanatomical domains in children who stutter.

Authors:  Ai Leen Choo; Evamarie Burnham; Kristin Hicks; Soo-Eun Chang
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  The Influence of Executive Functions on Phonemic Processing in Children Who Do and Do Not Stutter.

Authors:  Jayanthi Sasisekaran; Shriya Basu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Stuttering and natural speech processing of semantic and syntactic constraints on verbs.

Authors:  Christine Weber-Fox; Amanda Hampton
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.