Literature DB >> 18326174

Sources and spread of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. during partial depopulation of broiler chicken flocks.

V M Allen1, H Weaver, A M Ridley, J A Harris, M Sharma, J Emery, N Sparks, M Lewis, S Edge.   

Abstract

The practice of partial depopulation or thinning (early removal of a portion of birds from a commercial broiler flock) is a reported risk factor for Campylobacter colonization of residual birds because of the difficulty in maintaining biosecurity during the thinning process. The effect of this practice was studied in detail for 51 target flocks, each at a different growing farm belonging to one of seven major poultry companies throughout the United Kingdom. On 21 of these farms, the target flock was already colonized by Campylobacter, and at slaughter all cecal samples examined were positive, with a mean of 8 log CFU/g. An additional 27 flocks became positive within 2 to 6 days of the start of thinning and had similarly high levels of cecal carriage at slaughter. Just before the thinning process, Campylobacter was isolated frequently from the farm driveways, transport vehicles, equipment, and personnel. Strains from seven farms on which flocks became colonized after thinning were examined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing. An association was found between strains occurring at specific sampling sites and those isolated subsequently from the thinned flocks. The results indicated that particular strains had spread from one farm to another when the farms were jointly owned by the same company and employed the same bird-catching teams and/or vehicles. These results highlight the need for better hygiene control in relation to catching equipment and personnel and more effective cleaning and disinfection of vehicles and bird-transport crates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18326174     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-71.2.264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  21 in total

Review 1.  Biosecurity-based interventions and strategies to reduce Campylobacter spp. on poultry farms.

Authors:  D G Newell; K T Elvers; D Dopfer; I Hansson; P Jones; S James; J Gittins; N J Stern; R Davies; I Connerton; D Pearson; G Salvat; V M Allen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Longitudinal molecular epidemiological study of thermophilic campylobacters on one conventional broiler chicken farm.

Authors:  Anne M Ridley; Victoria K Morris; Shaun A Cawthraw; Johanne Ellis-Iversen; Jillian A Harris; Emma M Kennedy; Diane G Newell; Vivien M Allen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  On-farm Campylobacter and Escherichia coli in commercial broiler chickens: Re-used bedding does not influence Campylobacter emergence and levels across sequential farming cycles.

Authors:  H N Chinivasagam; W Estella; H Rodrigues; D G Mayer; C Weyand; T Tran; A Onysk; I Diallo
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Influence of season and geography on Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli subtypes in housed broiler flocks reared in Great Britain.

Authors:  F Jorgensen; J Ellis-Iversen; S Rushton; S A Bull; S A Harris; S J Bryan; A Gonzalez; T J Humphrey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  The Data Behind Risk Analysis of Campylobacter Jejuni and Campylobacter Coli Infections.

Authors:  Racem Ben Romdhane; Roswitha Merle
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

6.  Real-time PCR approach for detection of environmental sources of Campylobacter strains colonizing broiler flocks.

Authors:  Anne M Ridley; Vivien M Allen; Meenaxi Sharma; Jill A Harris; Diane G Newell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Quantifying transmission of Campylobacter jejuni in commercial broiler flocks.

Authors:  Twan van Gerwe; Jeanette K Miflin; Jillian M Templeton; Annemarie Bouma; Jaap A Wagenaar; Wilma F Jacobs-Reitsma; Arjan Stegeman; Don Klinkenberg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Campylobacter genotypes from poultry transportation crates indicate a source of contamination and transmission.

Authors:  R Hastings; F M Colles; N D McCarthy; M C J Maiden; S K Sheppard
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Effect of enhanced biosecurity and selected on-farm factors on Campylobacter colonization of chicken broilers.

Authors:  M Georgiev; W Beauvais; J Guitian
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.434

10.  Role played by the environment in the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) through the food chain.

Authors:  Konstantinos Koutsoumanis; Ana Allende; Avelino Álvarez-Ordóñez; Declan Bolton; Sara Bover-Cid; Marianne Chemaly; Robert Davies; Alessandra De Cesare; Lieve Herman; Friederike Hilbert; Roland Lindqvist; Maarten Nauta; Giuseppe Ru; Marion Simmons; Panagiotis Skandamis; Elisabetta Suffredini; Héctor Argüello; Thomas Berendonk; Lina Maria Cavaco; William Gaze; Heike Schmitt; Ed Topp; Beatriz Guerra; Ernesto Liébana; Pietro Stella; Luisa Peixe
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.