Literature DB >> 18324790

Theoretical thermodynamics for large molecules: walking the thin line between accuracy and computational cost.

Tobias Schwabe1, Stefan Grimme.   

Abstract

The thermodynamic properties of molecules are of fundamental interest in physics, chemistry, and biology. This Account deals with the developments that we have made in the about last five years to find quantum chemical electronic structure methods that have the prospect of being applicable to larger molecules. The typical target accuracy is about 0.5-1 kcal mol(-1) for chemical reaction and 0.1 kcal mol(-1) for conformational energies. These goals can be achieved when a few physically motivated corrections to first-principles methods are introduced to standard quantum chemical techniques. These do not lead to a significantly increased computational expense, and thus our methods have the computer hardware requirements of the corresponding standard treatments. Together with the use of density-fitting (RI) integral approximations, routine computations on systems with about 100 non-hydrogen atoms (2000-4000 basis functions) can be performed on modern PCs. Our improvements regarding accuracy are basically due to the use of modified second-order perturbation theory to account for many-particle (electron correlation) effects. Such nonlocal correlations are responsible for important parts of the interaction in and between atoms and molecules. A common example is the long-range dispersion interaction that lead to van der Waals complexes, but as shown here also the conventional thermodynamics of large molecules is significantly influenced by intramolecular dispersion effects. We first present the basic theoretical ideas behind our approaches, which are the spin-component-scaled Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (SCS-MP2) and double-hybrid density functionals (DHDF). Furthermore, the effect of the independently developed empirical dispersion correction (DFT-D) is discussed. Together with the use of large atomic orbital basis sets (of at least triple- or quadruple-zeta quality), the accuracy of the new methods is even competitive with computationally very expensive coupled-cluster methods, but they still remain routinely applicable for day-to-day chemical problems. This is demonstrated for the G3/99 benchmark set of heats of formation, 34 organic isomerization energies, and barriers for a number of pericyclic reactions. As an electronically complicated example, the relative energies of three isomeric Au(8) clusters are considered. In general, we recommend the very robust B2PLYP-D density functional approach for heat of formation calculations and for electronically complicated situations like transition metal complexes or open-shell species. With B2PLYP-D, an unprecedented low mean absolute deviation for the G3/99 test set with a DFT approach of 1.7 kcal mol(-1) has been achieved. For closed-shell main-group molecules and many relative energies, SCS-MP2 is the method of choice, because it completely avoids the self-interaction error problem that still plagues current DFT. In critical cases, it is recommended to apply SCS-MP2 and B2PLYP-D simultaneously, where also the comparison with standard MP2 and density functionals like B3LYP may lead to additional insight.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 18324790     DOI: 10.1021/ar700208h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acc Chem Res        ISSN: 0001-4842            Impact factor:   22.384


  13 in total

1.  A novel relationship between the radical-scavenging activity of flavonoids and enthalpy of formation revealed with Hartree-Fock computations and thermochemical deduction.

Authors:  Ameha Seyoum Woldu; Joachim Mai
Journal:  Redox Rep       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.412

2.  Influence of sequential guanidinium methylation on the energetics of the guanidinium...guanine dimer and guanidinium...guanine...cytosine trimer: implications for the control of protein...DNA interactions by arginine methyltransferases.

Authors:  Jason Shearer
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Perspectives on the simulation of protein-surface interactions using empirical force field methods.

Authors:  Robert A Latour
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 5.268

Review 4.  Quantum mechanical investigations of organocatalysis: mechanisms, reactivities, and selectivities.

Authors:  Paul Ha-Yeon Cheong; Claude Y Legault; Joann M Um; Nihan Çelebi-Ölçüm; K N Houk
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Δ-Quantum machine-learning for medicinal chemistry.

Authors:  Kenneth Atz; Clemens Isert; Markus N A Böcker; José Jiménez-Luna; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.945

6.  Accurate reaction enthalpies and sources of error in DFT thermochemistry for aldol, Mannich, and alpha-aminoxylation reactions.

Authors:  Steven E Wheeler; Antonio Moran; Susan N Pieniazek; K N Houk
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.781

7.  Quantum-mechanical study of 10-R-9-borabicyclo[3.3.2]decane alkene hydroboration.

Authors:  Daniel H Ess; Jeremy Kister; Ming Chen; William R Roush
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.354

8.  Aromatic Claisen Rearrangements of O-prenylated tyrosine and model prenyl aryl ethers: Computational study of the role of water on acceleration of Claisen rearrangements.

Authors:  Sílvia Osuna; Seonah Kim; Guillaume Bollot; K N Houk
Journal:  European J Org Chem       Date:  2013-05-01

9.  A comprehensive test set of epoxidation rate constants for iron(iv)-oxo porphyrin cation radical complexes.

Authors:  Mala A Sainna; Suresh Kumar; Devesh Kumar; Simonetta Fornarini; Maria Elisa Crestoni; Sam P de Visser
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 9.825

10.  Computational study of the rate constants and free energies of intramolecular radical addition to substituted anilines.

Authors:  Andreas Gansäuer; Meriam Seddiqzai; Tobias Dahmen; Rebecca Sure; Stefan Grimme
Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 2.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.